Today I solved a bug, spending 4 hours with Gemini3 and Opus4.5.

In the end, I consulted GPT-5.2-Codex, who provided insights to help pinpoint the issue.

So why didn't I use GPT-5.2-Codex from the start?

(I'll give myself a slap for wasting so much time)

Mainly because GPT-5.2-Codex's answers were filled with too many technical terms that I couldn't quite understand. My bug wasn't a code issue that could be directly fixed by AI, but rather a server configuration problem. I needed to look at the solutions while also working on it myself.

GPT-5.2-Codex is like a tech-savvy guy, very professional and skilled, but he comes off as quite aloof.

Gemini3 is an emotionally intelligent person, speaks nicely, and is warm. He kept encouraging me, saying that the next step would perfectly solve the issue. I felt like I was being pua'd for 4 hours.

So the question arises: the next time I encounter a bug, do I choose the warm-hearted guy or the highly skilled techie?

After 4 hours, I realized one thing:

I want both!!!

Let GPT-5.2-Codex propose solutions while Gemini3 explains those solutions to me.

It's all about having the best of both worlds!!

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。