There is another point that is very easy to overlook, but carries a high legal risk, which must be separately reminded—

You do not necessarily have to be the "mastermind" or "abscond with funds"; as long as you are involved in key aspects of the chain in such cases, such as directing traffic, scripting, recommending, transferring funds on behalf of others, or assisting in collection, you may be deemed as a co-conspirator or an accomplice.

You might argue, "I was just helping to introduce," "I was just facilitating the transfer of coins," "I didn't gain much from it";

These statements are not safe justifications in the context of criminal law.

What the judiciary focuses on is not how much money you made, but whether you knew or should have known that the related actions were illegal, yet still participated in key aspects.

On-chain transfers, fund transfers, and recommending platforms can all become nodes of criminal risk.

I hope friends working in the cryptocurrency industry have a clear understanding of this—

Market risks can be borne by oneself,

But legal risks, once crossed, often come with costs far exceeding expectations on the day of reckoning.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。