On December 29, in Hong Kong, it was reported that the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and the Monetary Authority (HKMA) are studying new regulations to allow retail investors to directly buy and sell crypto spot ETFs. The related consultations and discussions on details have entered a substantive stage. This signal is seen as another advancement for Hong Kong in the securitization and regulatory framework of virtual assets, potentially reshaping the flow of funds and product structure in the Hong Kong and global crypto trading markets in 2024. Once the policy is implemented, Hong Kong may shift from a "professional investor testing ground" to a "compliance asset platform for the public," directly changing the participation threshold for retail investors and the landscape of cross-border capital competition.
Regulatory Actions and Policy Positioning
● News Driven: The Research Brief indicates that the SFC and HKMA have initiated internal and industry discussions on "opening virtual asset spot ETFs to retail investors," with directions including: relaxing investor qualifications, clarifying custody and valuation rules, and strengthening product risk disclosures.
● Current Framework: As of the end of 2023, Hong Kong adopts a cautious model for virtual asset-related ETFs, which is "only for professional investors," with thresholds typically set at not less than 8 million HKD for individuals or institutions, effectively excluding retail investors from the market.
● New Regulation Positioning: Based on the discussion directions disclosed in the Brief, this round of adjustments is positioned as "expanding the base of qualified investors without sacrificing investor protection," without relaxing risk control requirements, but balancing through product structure, leverage limits, and suitability assessments.
● Regulatory Goals: The policy aims to achieve three points:
● Gradually guide unregulated retail trading to regulated platforms and licensed products;
● Consolidate Hong Kong's position as an "international virtual asset center," in line with the virtual asset trading platform licensing system implemented in 2023;
● Provide more compliant allocation tools for medium to long-term funds and family offices without disrupting the traditional financial order.
This policy direction contrasts with the previous cautious path limited to professional investors, demonstrating an increase in Hong Kong regulators' confidence in market maturity and infrastructure safety, and reflecting Hong Kong's desire to seize incremental funds and product discourse through compliant innovation amid intensified regional competition.
Changes in Retail Investor Thresholds and Restructuring of Capital Entry
● Threshold Switch: If retail investors are allowed to purchase crypto spot ETFs, the biggest change will be:
● Investment qualifications will expand from "high net worth/professional investors" to ordinary retail clients;
● Entry methods will shift from "opening overseas exchange accounts, holding private keys," etc., to placing orders through local brokers and bank channels.
● Roles of Banks and Brokers: The Research Brief points out that several licensed brokers and banks in Hong Kong have previously established compliant sales and custody channels for "virtual asset-related products." If retail investors are allowed:
● Broker apps may add a section for crypto spot ETFs, alongside stocks, bonds, and funds;
● Banks may treat them as a type of high-risk asset allocation within wealth management accounts, managing them alongside structured products.
● Upgraded Capital Entry:
● For individuals, the buying path will shift from "crypto accounts" to "securities accounts," with KYC completed once, shared across multiple assets;
● For institutions, public funds, family offices, and insurance funds can inject capital into related products under clearer licensing and custody rules, without directly touching on-chain assets.
● Risks and Limitations:
● The Brief mentions that products available to retail investors in the future may have upper limits set on leverage multiples, single account holding sizes, and risk level classifications;
● At the same time, it will strengthen suitability assessments and risk disclosure obligations, such as requiring brokers to prompt warnings about price volatility, 24-hour trading time differences, and technical risks before transactions.
The change in thresholds does not mean "complete liberalization," but rather brings Hong Kong retail investors, who were originally participating in gray areas through overseas platforms and OTC, into a regulated ETF framework with scrutiny, regulation, and risk control, redistributing capital entry.
Comparison with the Progress of US Spot ETFs
● Time Dimension: The Research Brief reviews that the US market engaged in multiple rounds of negotiations over Bitcoin spot ETFs in 2023, with several asset management giants submitting applications to the SEC, and the market betting on approval in early 2024. Hong Kong's actions are clearly a "regional synchronized follow-up" after observing the US regulatory stance.
● Product Attribute Differences:
● US spot ETFs focus on serving global institutional funds and retirement/pension accounts, emphasizing large-scale capital market toolization;
● If Hong Kong's spot ETFs are opened to retail investors, they will emphasize regional retail market participation and the local absorption capacity of Asian funds.
● Regulatory Thought Differences:
● The US SEC has long maintained a cautious or even conservative attitude towards crypto assets, with core concerns about market manipulation, information disclosure, and custody risks;
● In contrast, Hong Kong is advancing pilot projects by gradually opening product levels based on an already established virtual asset licensing system, moving from trading platforms to futures ETFs and then to spot ETFs, with a more gradual and controllable pace.
● Capital Flow Linkage:
● If both the US and Hong Kong allow spot ETFs to be listed simultaneously, global capital may form linkage arbitrage and allocation between time zones and liquidity;
● Retail investors and high-net-worth individuals in the Asian time zone may prefer to participate through Hong Kong channels rather than directly using US brokerage accounts.
In this comparison, Hong Kong's strategy is not simply to "follow the US," but to leverage its position as a financial center in Asia to create a window for the securitization of crypto assets aimed at local and surrounding funds against the backdrop of the US regulatory attitude gradually becoming clearer.
Impact on Hong Kong's Crypto Ecosystem and Exchange Landscape
● Profits for Compliant Trading Platforms:
● The Research Brief indicates that Hong Kong has issued virtual asset trading platform licenses, requiring compliance with traditional financial-level standards in custody, risk control, and anti-money laundering;
● If spot ETFs are approved, their spot trading and custody will likely be deeply integrated with these licensed platforms, bringing them new transaction volumes and custody income.
● Pressure on Offshore Exchanges:
● Currently, a large number of users in Hong Kong and surrounding areas conduct spot and contract trading through overseas centralized exchanges;
● As local ETFs provide more convenient fiat currency deposit and tax compliance paths, some funds have the motivation to migrate from "on-chain + offshore platforms" to "local brokers + ETF products."
● Market Making and Liquidity Structure:
● ETF market making requires stable and transparent spot buy-sell counterparts and liquidity providers, which will compel local compliant platforms and international market makers to increase their presence in Hong Kong;
● Liquidity will shift from "pure crypto order books" to "securitized order books + ETF secondary markets," and the price discovery mechanism may become more diverse.
● Industry Support:
● Custody, auditing, valuation, and risk management service providers will form a complete virtual asset securitization industry chain in Hong Kong;
● Family offices and wealth management institutions will package more structured allocation schemes around ETFs, further enhancing Hong Kong's attractiveness among high-net-worth individuals.
Overall, this policy discussion is both a continuation of Hong Kong's friendly stance towards virtual assets in recent years and a key step in upgrading the local crypto ecosystem from "exchange-driven" to "product and asset management-driven."
Bullish and Bearish Views and Market Divergence
● Optimistic/Supportive Side:
● They believe this is a milestone benefit for Hong Kong's virtual asset regulatory path, expected to replicate the incremental capital effects that traditional ETFs brought to the stock and bond markets;
● They argue that including retail investors in the compliance framework will help reduce the harm of "chaotic platforms" and high-leverage derivatives to ordinary investors, guiding speculative behavior into the regulatory view;
● Some institutions expect that once retail investors can conveniently participate through ETFs, crypto assets will be more easily included in long-term asset allocations, rather than short-term speculative targets.
● Pessimistic/Prudent Side:
● They worry that price volatility will still be difficult to control; even in ETF form, it cannot fundamentally eliminate the high volatility characteristics of the underlying assets, and retail investors may still suffer significant losses due to chasing prices;
● They express concerns about regulatory arbitrage: if standards are not uniform, there may be capital "turning" between ETFs and OTC channels across different jurisdictions, amplifying systemic risks;
● They believe that opening retail participation too quickly before a global consensus on crypto asset regulation is fully formed may pose pressure on Hong Kong's overall financial stability in extreme market conditions.
The competition between these two viewpoints reflects the divergence on how to balance "financial innovation" and "investor protection," which will also be the core focus of debate in future rule design and product approval processes.
Outlook: Rule Implementation and Market Evolution Path
In the short term, the market will continue to focus on the SFC and HKMA's subsequent formal consultation documents, draft details, and product approval pace. If the institutional framework and the first batch of products can be completed in 2024, Hong Kong is expected to be the first in Asia to form a crypto spot ETF market open to retail investors, creating a demonstration effect on regional capital flows and product innovation. In the medium term, this process will also intertwine with external variables such as US spot ETFs and European compliance frameworks, collectively shaping the competitive landscape of global crypto asset securitization. For investors, what truly needs to be grasped is not just "whether they can buy," but "how to allocate assets within controllable risk boundaries under the gradually improving regulatory framework."
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
