On March 19, in the East 8 Time Zone, the Solana ecosystem MEME token Slerf (SLERF) experienced extreme market fluctuations, completing a dramatic reversal from "accident token" to "sentiment leader" within just 24 hours. The project team had earlier mistakenly burned all private placement and liquidity tokens, which the market reinterpreted as a narrative of scarcity and speculative chips. Coupled with the high-frequency rotation of funds on the Solana chain, Slerf became the core anchor point of a new round of MEME sentiment.

Fund Dynamics: The Trading Structure Behind Slerf's Surge

● News Driven:

● The project team admitted in a live broadcast on March 18 that approximately 50 million SLERF tokens originally intended for private placement and liquidity provision were mistakenly burned, attracting widespread attention.
● This incident meant that the chips originally allocated to early investors and market-making funds were directly erased, fundamentally rewriting the circulation structure and becoming a direct catalyst for subsequent speculation.

● Fund Movements:

● Research Brief shows that within about 6 hours after the incident, the trading volume for SLERF on the Solana chain rapidly expanded, with several leading quantitative market-making accounts repeatedly placing high-frequency orders on DEXs like Jupiter and Raydium, quickly restoring market depth.
● DEX aggregation routing data indicated that SLERF's daily on-chain trading volume during peak periods exceeded hundreds of millions of dollars, briefly placing it among the top in the Solana ecosystem, second only to mainstream MEME and on-chain blue-chip assets.
● Some newly entered wallets completed multiple high sell-low buy operations within 3 hours of their first interaction, reflecting clear short-term speculative characteristics rather than long-term allocation behavior.

● Price Performance:

● At the beginning of the incident, SLERF's price experienced a momentary crash, with a maximum intraday drawdown of nearly 80%, but after funds quickly stepped in, the price completed a V-shaped reversal within a day.
● According to rough statistics from Brief, from the bottom of the incident to the peak of sentiment, SLERF's maximum increase reached multiple times, creating a strong emotional siphoning effect within the MEME sector.

● Participation Structure:

● On-chain holding distribution shows that the proportion held by top addresses significantly increased, with the concentration of front-row holdings showing a notable rise before and after the incident, laying the groundwork for subsequent volatility.
● Small and medium addresses primarily engaged in high-frequency trading, with holding periods generally less than 24 hours, and many addresses completed a cycle of "chasing high—stop loss—chasing high again" in a short period, highlighting speculative attributes.

Incident Narrative: From "Deadly Mistake" to "Extreme Scarcity" Emotional Amplification

The core of this event is not merely a technical error but its secondary fermentation at the narrative level:

● Scarcity Logic Restructuring:

● The project's accidental burning of private placement and LP positions resulted in a substantial reduction of SLERF's distributable chips, leading the market to compare it to an "extreme deflation" experimental case.
● Since Brief did not provide complete total token supply and inflation curve data, it is difficult to accurately calculate the reduction ratio of the circulating supply, but most traders are more concerned with the emotional narrative of "what was burned was real money," rather than a rigorous token economic model.

● Trust and Moral Game:

● From a contract operation perspective, this incident exposed obvious flaws in the project team's multi-signature management, permission levels, and operational processes, as confirmed by on-chain records.
● However, some traders packaged it as an "extremely fair issuance with no private placement and no reserves," and discussions began to emerge on social platforms about "everyone starting from the same starting line," downplaying the risks brought by the project's lack of professional capability.

● Social Media Amplification:

● Brief mentioned that within hours of the incident, the volume of topics related to SLERF on the X platform surged, with a daily increase of dozens of times, and several KOLs repeatedly reinforced the emotional combination of "human error + extreme deflation" in live broadcasts and tweets.
● The project team repeatedly apologized in the live broadcast and promised to "compensate" early supporters through subsequent fee income, NFTs, etc. This "anti-fragile" narrative further stimulated the conversion of onlookers' funds into actual buying.

Deep Logic: MEME Market, Solana Narrative, and Liquidity Resonance

The extreme market behavior of SLERF is not an isolated event but a result of the resonance with the funding structure of the Solana ecosystem, MEME speculative cycles, and overall market liquidity. On a more macro level, Solana has become the main battlefield for high-frequency speculative funds over the past quarter due to low gas fees, high performance, and a rich array of trading tools. A large amount of short-term capital rotates rapidly between different MEMEs, and once a new target emerges that combines "accident scarcity + emotional resonance," it is easy to form a momentary waterfall of funds. The accidental burning of SLERF happened precisely during the most active MEME narrative and the most abundant on-chain liquidity, making it naturally equipped to become a "consensus meme" across the network. More importantly, this "black swan deflation" led some participants to associate it with early legendary projects on the chain, endowing it with a data premium far exceeding its fundamentals on an emotional level, thus driving unexpected price increases and concentration of holdings.

Bull-Bear Divergence: Extreme Speculation or Scarcity Dividend

● Optimistic/Supporters:

● They believe that the burning incident has objectively significantly reduced the circulating chips of SLERF, creating a rare scarcity dividend, which is expected to occupy a place in the MEME sector in the long term.
● They emphasize:
● The project team has "no private placement, no reserves," and the team's interests are completely tied to the secondary market, leading to more aligned incentives;
● The Solana ecosystem is currently in an emotional upcycle, with strong demand for new "story targets," and SLERF's narrative is highly recognizable;
● The current on-chain depth and trading activity have proven market acceptance, and short-term volatility is seen as normal reshuffling.

● Pessimistic/Opponents:

● They worry that this surge is more a concentrated manifestation of "emotional bubble + technical squeeze" rather than a sustainable value reassessment.
● They point out:
● The project team made basic mistakes in key asset management, indicating structural shortcomings in safety and risk awareness;
● The rising concentration of holdings, combined with a large amount of short-term speculative capital, could lead to a flash crash in prices once on-chain sentiment cools;
● The lack of a clear long-term product plan and cash flow support means that once the narrative recedes, SLERF is likely to revert to a typical high Beta MEME target rather than an "asset of the new era."

Outlook: How Slerf Will Be Repriced After the Emotional Tide Recedes

In the short term, the market will continue to focus on changes in SLERF's on-chain holding structure, details of the project's subsequent compensation mechanism, and the continuity of funds in the overall MEME track of Solana. If the project team can take substantial actions in safety governance, fund transparency, and community building, combined with no significant retreat in on-chain liquidity, then SLERF has the opportunity to build a relatively stable trading range after the intense volatility, gradually transitioning from "extreme accident market" to "high-risk emotional asset" normalized pricing. Conversely, if the Solana ecosystem enters a cooling rotation period, SLERF and similar targets that heavily rely on narrative and sentiment will face dual tests of rapid valuation compression and a cliff-like drop in on-chain transactions.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。