Leverage Accumulation Overview
Recently, the associated address "66kETHBorrow" under Yili Hua's Trend Research completed a typical collateralized lending cycle between Aave and Binance. On-chain data shows that this address first purchased approximately 11,520 ETH on Binance, worth about $34.93 million at the time, and then transferred this batch of ETH to Aave as collateral. After establishing the collateral, it borrowed approximately 20 million USDT from Aave, and then the borrowed stablecoins flowed back to Binance to continue acquiring ETH, forming a closed-loop cycle of funds between centralized exchanges and decentralized lending protocols. At the same time, there was a significant opposite action in the market: the whale address "pension-usdt.eth" reportedly closed out approximately 30,000 ETH short positions, incurring a loss of about $285,000. One is amplifying long leverage while the other is actively closing shorts; the opposing paths of institutional leverage accumulation and whale short covering are seen by some traders as on-chain signals of current long-short power repositioning and potential sentiment turning points.
On-Chain Operation Breakdown
From a procedural perspective, the actions of the "66kETHBorrow" address are relatively clear: first, this address accumulated approximately 11,520 ETH on Binance, valued at about $34.93 million, and then withdrew these newly purchased ETH to the blockchain in bulk and deposited them into Aave as the main collateral asset for borrowing. After completing the collateralization, the address opened a lending position on Aave, withdrawing approximately 20 million USDT. This portion of stablecoins then flowed out of Aave back to the Binance account for further ETH purchases, thereby amplifying its Ethereum exposure without a one-time full investment of its own funds. In terms of address attributes, the market often associates "66kETHBorrow" with Trend Research and Yili Hua, based on tracking from multiple on-chain analytics and industry media. However, this "affiliation" is primarily based on address labeling and behavioral pattern inference, lacking direct official confirmation, thus maintaining a boundary in transparency. External analysis can only characterize behavior based on verifiable on-chain transaction records and cannot equate it to a complete institutional balance sheet.
Leverage Structure Risks
The collateralized lending cycle accumulation essentially uses held ETH as collateral to borrow USDT from protocols like Aave, then exchanges the borrowed stablecoins back for ETH to amplify long positions. The returns come from a larger nominal exposure when prices rise, while the costs involve introducing threefold risks: liquidation lines, borrowing rates, and market liquidity. Currently, the outside world does not know the total ETH holdings of Trend Research, nor can it accurately calculate the floating profit and loss of this leveraged position or the specific liquidation price range. It can only be judged structurally: when ETH prices experience a deep correction, an increase in collateralization rates may trigger Aave's automatic liquidation. Coupled with rising interest rates or a sudden drop in market liquidity, this could amplify the risk of passive selling. On a macro level, market voices have begun to warn of the need to be cautious about the "exhaustion of positive news" following the new Federal Reserve chair's appointment. If policy expectations are fulfilled and risk appetite declines, ETH, along with other risk assets, may correct, putting these high-leverage longs at the forefront. The chain reaction of price declines and passive deleveraging could amplify the fragility of this strategy in extreme scenarios.
Whale Short Covering
In stark contrast to the leverage accumulation by the Trend Research-associated address, the whale address "pension-usdt.eth" was recently disclosed by a single source to have closed out approximately 30,000 ETH short positions, incurring a loss of about $285,000 in the process. This on-chain record shows that the whale chose to actively take a loss and exit rather than continue betting on a larger decline in the context of unfavorable price movements for shorts or a shift in risk appetite. Directionally, Trend is amplifying longs by borrowing USDT from Aave, while pension-usdt.eth is covering shorts and stopping bets on declines. The timing of both actions is highly coincident, but their directions are completely opposite, reflecting that some large funds are abandoning the short narrative and instead accepting or even cooperating with Ethereum's long structure. In the short term, such whale short-covering behavior is expected to alleviate selling pressure in the market and reduce downward leverage in derivatives, but its impact on spot and sentiment still has boundaries: on one hand, the behavior of a single address is hard to represent the collective choice of all shorts; on the other hand, under larger macro and liquidity-driven conditions, the stop-loss actions of a single whale provide more localized sentiment signals rather than being a sufficient condition for a trend reversal.
Solana On-Chain Comparison
While Ethereum is seeing institutional leverage accumulation, Solana's on-chain activity presents a distinctly different but equally high-intensity picture. According to data from a single source, the cumulative trading volume of Solana's DEX has surpassed approximately $1.7 trillion, with related ETF sizes reaching about $766 million, indicating a strong willingness for high-frequency trading and allocation on this public chain. This focus on high turnover and active derivatives/spot trading runs parallel to Ethereum's emphasis on institutional lending and leverage accumulation, and is viewed by many market observers as a misaligned rotation performance within the same crypto macro cycle: on one end is the high Beta public chain narrative and on-chain trading prosperity, while on the other end, the established main chain plays a "core long" role in institutional asset allocation. The migration of funds between different public chains essentially reflects a rebalancing of risk appetite between "growth" and "certainty." Solana's high activity provides elasticity for overall market capitalization, while Ethereum's institutional accumulation may serve as a more stable anchor in mid-term pricing. The interplay between the two will indirectly affect the premium level ETH enjoys in the next phase of mid-term valuation.
Market Narrative Evolution
In terms of public opinion, industry media generally interpret Trend Research's recent actions as "institutional behavior bullish on Ethereum." This interpretation primarily comes from multiple reports tracking Ethereum's institutional holdings and on-chain data, representing a consensus summary around visible operational paths rather than an official stance. In the macro environment, expectations of personnel changes at the Federal Reserve, marginal improvements in global liquidity, and the activity of high Beta public chains like Solana, combined with institutional accumulation actions on Ethereum, including Trend, have been linked by the media into a mid-term bullish narrative about "ETH entering a new round of institutional allocation cycle." On-chain data provides evidence of real capital entry, macro factors provide the backdrop of risk appetite and liquidity, and media narratives package it into a logical chain that can be accepted by a broader range of investors. However, within this optimistic narrative, underestimated risk factors still exist, including systemic liquidation risks that may arise from further increases in leverage ratios, selling pressure from "exhaustion of positive news" if macro expectations fall short, and narrative biases where the actions of a single or few institutions are overly extrapolated into "industry consensus." If prices experience unexpected volatility, these overlooked aspects could become triggers for a rapid narrative reversal.
Risks and Outlook
Without fabricating cumulative holding sizes and specific floating profit and loss data, the current verifiable boundaries based on on-chain and public information roughly include: the Trend Research-associated address bought approximately 11,520 ETH in this round and formed a leveraged long by borrowing about 20 million USDT through Aave; the whale "pension-usdt.eth" reportedly closed out approximately 30,000 ETH shorts and took a loss; and the Solana ecosystem maintained high-intensity on-chain activity and ETF size during the same period. These facts point to a distinctly characterized phase: institutions and large addresses are reshaping their risk exposure structures around ETH and mainstream public chains. From a qualitative perspective, the collateralized lending cycle accumulation model has a certain amplifying effect on returns when funding costs are controllable and price trends are relatively clear, but its sustainability highly depends on ETH prices not experiencing sharp reversals and a moderate environment for borrowing rates and liquidity. Once faced with a sharp drop triggered by "exhaustion of positive news" or liquidity contraction, liquidation risks will quickly amplify. For ordinary investors, when interpreting on-chain "institutional accumulation signals," key dimensions to focus on include: changes in collateralization rates and borrowing scales, liquidity depth of ETH and stablecoin pools on major lending protocols, leverage direction in futures and options markets, and trends in funding costs related to macro interest rate expectations. Whether more independent institutional addresses can replicate similar operations and how these leveraged positions adjust during large-scale volatility will be key observation points to determine whether this round of institutional long narrative can continue.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
