Spot gold has refreshed its historical high for several consecutive days, reaching a peak of about $4,525 per ounce. The latest intraday quote has retreated from above $4,500 to the range of $4,460-$4,470 per ounce, with a maximum daily fluctuation of less than 1%. Mainstream market sources indicate that on the evening of December 24, gold prices briefly dipped to around $4,470.9, and then continued to oscillate narrowly below $4,470, with a cumulative increase of about 68%-70% for the year. This round of fluctuations has not corresponded to any clear single bearish news, but is more driven by year-end settlements, technical overbought conditions, and profit-taking sentiment. In the short term, investors need to focus on the effectiveness of support in the $4,400-$4,450 range and the impact of subsequent macro data on the expectation of "higher rates for longer" to determine whether gold will restart its upward momentum or enter a wide consolidation at high levels.
Core Events
After reaching a historical high, the price of spot gold has entered a clear high-level consolidation phase. According to Jinshi data, on the night of December 24, spot gold briefly fell about $18, hitting a low of $4,470.9 per ounce, and then "fell back below $4,470 per ounce, with a daily decline of about 0.3%-0.4%." From the recent fluctuation range, gold prices have retreated from the previous high of around $4,525 to the $4,460-$4,470 range, with a pullback of approximately 1%-1.5%.
Against the backdrop of an annual increase of about 70%, the retreat from above $4,500 to the $4,460-$4,470 range is more akin to a technical correction at high levels rather than a signal of a trend reversal.
In terms of time, since the effective breakthrough of $4,400 on December 22 and the creation of a historical high, gold has quickly surged to the $4,500-$4,525 range within just a few days, combined with several months of unilateral strength, making any intraday pullback in late December particularly sensitive on the chart. However, in terms of absolute magnitude, the current intraday decline of less than 1% still falls within the normal fluctuation range, and prices remain stable near historical highs.
On the driving side, research briefs and Jinshi's information have not provided a clear "bearish trigger." After the release of initial jobless claims data, spot gold and the DXY dollar index showed little short-term movement, while U.S. stock index futures remained stable. This sets the tone for the current pullback: it is not a sharp sell-off triggered by a single event, but rather a natural rebalancing process of funds and sentiment at high levels.
Incentive Analysis: News, Funds, and Sentiment
In terms of news, the current macro environment for gold can be summarized as "strong economic data, relatively clear policy path, and inflation and geopolitical risks not fundamentally dissipated." Research briefs mention that the U.S. economy grew at an annualized rate of 4.3% in the third quarter, marking the fastest expansion in nearly two years, which supports market pricing for "higher rates to last longer." Meanwhile, after the release of initial jobless claims data, the muted response of gold and the dollar index indicates that a single data point has not changed the market's existing expectations for the monetary policy path. In this context, the pullback in gold prices is difficult to simply attribute to a specific data point, but rather resembles a "breather" after a series of consecutive increases.
The most significant feature of the news is that there has been no obvious new bearish blow to gold bulls, nor has there been any new major bullish factor to significantly strengthen safe-haven demand; prices are more oscillating at high levels around existing macro expectations.
On the funding side, high-level fluctuations combined with key integer levels are key to understanding the current market. Previously, gold prices continuously broke through $4,400, $4,450, and then first stood above $4,500. Each breakthrough of an integer level means that some technical buying has passively followed, some shorts have been stopped out, and it also lays the groundwork for subsequent profit-taking. When gold prices lingered near $4,525 for a limited time and failed to quickly establish a new solid trading zone, short-term funds were more inclined to lock in profits during the first wave of pullbacks.
Year-end factors are also an unavoidable variable in the funding side. In late December, many institutions began annual performance settlements, asset portfolio rebalancing, and risk exposure adjustments. For gold, which has seen an annual increase of nearly 70%, it is a natural action to moderately reduce positions, compress leverage, and realize floating profits. Some passive tracking funds may also exhibit selling behavior during the recalculation of weights, which structurally reinforces the short-term direction of "high-level pullbacks rather than bottom fishing."
Sentiment has played an amplifying role in this round of fluctuations. Representative views from KOLs and communities indicate that the overall atmosphere remains bullish and FOMO-driven. On one hand, some emphasize that "gold has outperformed significantly after breaking above $4,200, with an unknown endpoint"; on the other hand, some bloggers suggest "gradually reducing positions to lock in profits around $4,357, targeting $4,500." As prices truly broke through $4,400 and then $4,500, these two types of voices coexisted: one emphasized that "the ultimate bull market is not over," while the other warned of "moderate profit-taking and controlling drawdowns."
In this context, when gold prices slightly retreat from high levels, the former tends to view it as a "buying opportunity," while the latter chooses to "reduce positions on rallies." The combined effect results in increased trading volume and intensified fluctuations, but there has not yet been a consensus on panic selling.
Deeper Logic: Macro Environment and Sector Linkage
From a deeper logical perspective, the current phase of gold is in a so-called "super bull market," closely related to the global macro environment, asset rotation, and changes in risk appetite. In 2025, gold has seen an annual increase of about 68%-70%, while silver has surged by about 140%, marking the largest annual increase in nearly 45 years. Precious metals have become one of the most prominent sectors in global asset allocation. This indicates that institutions and individual investors have continuously increased their allocation to precious metals over the past year, viewing them as key tools for hedging against inflation, addressing fiscal deficits, and managing geopolitical risks.
The macro background and sector linkage have jointly shaped gold's "new normal of high valuation," and the current slight pullback resembles a fine-tuning of this new normal rather than a fundamental overturning of its logic.
On the macro level, after multiple rounds of interest rate hikes, inflation in the U.S. and other major economies has receded from its peak but remains above pre-pandemic average levels, and fiscal deficits and government debt pressures have not significantly eased. The market's medium- to long-term expectation of "nominal rates remaining high, but real rates declining in the mid-cycle" has made gold's role as a "long-term store of value and hedging tool" more prominent in asset allocation.
In terms of sector linkage, silver's larger increase and more volatile fluctuations compared to gold reflect the differences in the dual attributes of "safe-haven + speculation" within precious metals: gold is more inclined towards value storage and hedging, while silver also possesses characteristics of an industrial metal and high-beta speculative asset. In mid-2025, when silver's increase reached 140%, its intraday fluctuations were often significantly greater than those of gold, indicating that short-term funds were more actively engaged in the silver market. In this structure, gold's fluctuations are viewed as "relatively mild," enhancing its attractiveness in stable allocations.
Comparing with risk asset markets is also important. The brief mentions the Central Bank of Russia's plan to open up crypto investments and new institutions continuing to increase their holdings of Ethereum, indicating that high-risk assets are still attracting some liquidity, but this has not weakened gold's central position. More often, the market is making "structural trade-offs" between different assets: when the stock and crypto markets are temporarily strong, some short-term funds may withdraw from defensive assets like gold; however, when macro uncertainties rise again, these funds may flow back into the precious metals system. The current magnitude and rhythm of gold's pullback do not indicate a unilateral, sustained squeeze of funds.
Bull-Bear Game: Three Major Controversies
At the current price range, the bull-bear game around gold mainly focuses on three core divergences: inflation and real interest rate expectations, the interplay between safe-haven demand and risk appetite, and the understanding of technical patterns and chip structures.
On inflation and real interest rate expectations, bulls argue that global inflation and fiscal deficit pressures remain unresolved, and the medium- to long-term expectation of negative real interest rates still provides a solid valuation anchor for gold. The nearly 70% increase this year is seen as a correction of previous long-term underallocation, and the significant increase in institutional allocation ratios reflects the realization of long-term logic. Bears, on the other hand, believe that within the price range around $4,500, gold has "preemptively realized" a large amount of future uncertainty risk premium. If economic data continues to be strong and the market begins to reprice higher and longer real interest rates, medium- to long-term valuations will face compression.
The biggest divergence between bulls and bears lies in whether the current price is the "starting point of a long-term logic just beginning" or a "phase high that is already highly crowded with bullish sentiment."
In the interplay between safe-haven demand and risk appetite, bulls emphasize that geopolitical conflicts and systemic risks have not dissipated, and gold's "insurance function" remains necessary; meanwhile, the high volatility and high valuation of the stock and crypto markets actually increase the necessity of allocating gold in investment portfolios. Bears focus on the potential踩踏 risk of "crowded trades": when too much capital flows into gold under the guise of "safe-haven + inflation hedging," any slight easing of risk aversion or stronger performance of risk assets could lead to gold being sold off to recoup liquidity.
From the perspective of technical and chip structure, bulls view the current retreat from $4,525 to $4,460-$4,470 as a typical "high-level reshuffle" and "strong consolidation": the decline is limited, and it has not broken below the previous key support zone of $4,400-$4,450, maintaining a sound trend structure. If a new trading zone is established above $4,400, it will lay a healthier foundation for the next round of upward movement. Bears emphasize that the $4,500 integer level and the area above it have accumulated a large amount of short-term chasing chips. If prices encounter resistance in this area and the duration of the pullback extends, it can easily be interpreted as a "top signal," triggering systemic stop-losses and technical selling pressure.
This divergence directly affects the behavior patterns of different investors: bulls are more willing to gradually increase positions when prices are around $4,460-$4,470 or even dip to near $4,400, while bears and cautious funds choose to wait for clearer technical breakdown signals or deeper pullbacks before considering medium- to long-term allocations.
Outlook: Three Paths and Key Conditions
Regarding the future, gold can roughly be divided into three evolutionary paths: under specific macro, funding, and technical conditions, corresponding to "continuing to set new highs," "wide fluctuations at high levels," and "deep corrections." Different types of investors need to establish corresponding scenario frameworks based on their attributes and cycles, rather than betting on a single outcome.
In the scenario of "continuing to set new highs," the prerequisites to be observed include: macro data and policy expectations pointing to a peak or even decline in nominal interest rates, a decrease in real interest rate expectations; a resurgence of geopolitical conflicts or systemic risks, reinforcing safe-haven demand; at the same time, gold stabilizing in the $4,400-$4,450 range and completing a chip turnover, with net inflows resuming in ETFs and related products. Under these conditions, the current oscillation in the $4,460-$4,470 range resembles a "platform building" before the next round of upward movement, and the possibility of refreshing historical highs cannot be ruled out.
In the scenario of "wide fluctuations at high levels," macro data and policy expectations remain generally stable: the economy maintains moderate growth, U.S. Treasury yields and policy rates hover at high levels, inflation recedes but remains above long-term targets, and geopolitical risks fluctuate. On the funding side, institutions and retail investors have a balanced attitude towards gold: there is neither a clear impulse to increase allocation nor a large-scale motivation to reduce positions. In this context, gold prices are likely to oscillate repeatedly in the $4,400-$4,550 range, using time to exchange space to complete chip restructuring. In this scenario, trend-following funds need to adapt to larger intraday and weekly fluctuations, and short- to medium-term strategies of buying high and selling low within the range may become mainstream.
If macro and funding conditions only undergo marginal adjustments rather than drastic changes, gold is more likely to enter a wide fluctuation phase centered around $4,400-$4,500 at high levels, achieving a rebalancing of bullish and bearish forces through time and volatility.
The scenario of a "deep correction" requires multiple bearish factors to overlap: for example, continuous economic data exceeding expectations, the market re-pricing a higher path for real interest rates; significant alleviation of inflationary pressures, leading to a temporary weakening of hedging demand; a general strengthening of global risk assets, with a noticeable increase in risk appetite, resulting in a decline in gold's relative attractiveness in asset allocation; at the same time, high-leverage positions are concentrated, and once key technical support levels (such as around 4,400) are effectively broken, stop-losses and passive position reductions will be released. In this scenario, gold may not only experience a 1%-2% intraday pullback but could also undergo a deeper price correction and emotional adjustment.
For different types of investors, position and risk management strategies should also differ. For example, long-term allocation funds focus more on the long-term paths of inflation, fiscal policy, real interest rates, and geopolitical risks. As long as these core logics are not denied, high-level pullbacks often present opportunities to optimize costs and build positions in batches. Within this framework, it is more important to maintain flexibility in positions and cash during significant fluctuations, rather than attempting to precisely bottom-fish or top-tick.
For investors primarily engaged in swing and short-term trading, the difficulty at the current stage has significantly increased. On one hand, prices are near historical highs, with daily fluctuations potentially reaching dozens of dollars, necessitating a reasonable widening of stop-loss and take-profit spaces; on the other hand, the divergence between bulls and bears has significantly increased, making technical pattern signals prone to "false breakouts" and "false breakdowns." These investors need clearer trading plans, such as constructing range strategies around the support zone of $4,400-$4,450 and the resistance zone of $4,500-$4,525, while strictly controlling leverage and single trade risk exposure.
From a more macro perspective, the recent retreat from above $4,500 to the $4,460-$4,470 range represents a typical "small pullback at high levels" in gold's super bull market: the intensity is not great, but the information content is extremely high. It reminds the market that even in a strong trend, rebalancing of funds and sentiment can occur at any time; the closer to historical highs, the more fluctuations and noise there will be, making simple linear extrapolation increasingly dangerous.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
