As Bitcoin hovers around $85,000–$90,000, a "silent" change is occurring in the on-chain funding structure. Data from CryptoQuant shows that during December, the inflow of funds from whales to Binance dropped from $7.88 billion to $3.86 billion, a decrease of nearly 50%. However, there was still a significant single transfer of $466 million during this period. Against the backdrop of prices maintaining a narrow fluctuation around $87,000, this sharp decline in whale deposits seems more like a repricing of the "selling pressure structure" and "high-level speculation" rather than a simple directional signal.
Recently, Bitcoin has been fluctuating in the $85,000–$90,000 range, with Bloomberg data showing prices repeatedly oscillating around $87,000. Meanwhile, the inflow of funds from whales to Binance, as recorded by CryptoQuant, decreased from $7.88 billion to $3.86 billion, indicating a clear retreat in funding. With this data, the market is beginning to reassess: in the absence of incremental selling pressure, what information is being released by the high-level consolidation?
Core of the Event
Since December, Bitcoin's price has fluctuated repeatedly in the $85,000–$90,000 range, stabilizing multiple times around the $87,000 mark, with overall volatility significantly lower than during the previous breakout phase. In contrast to the relatively "calm" price performance, there has been a notable shift in the behavior of large on-chain funds—CryptoQuant data shows that the inflow of funds from large addresses marked as whales to Binance decreased from $7.88 billion to $3.86 billion, with pressure on the funding side nearly halved.
While the overall inflow scale is declining, a significant deposit of approximately $466 million worth of Bitcoin was still recorded on-chain, becoming one of the most closely watched single transactions during this phase. On one hand, the total volume has significantly contracted, while on the other, there are individual large transfers; this tension has also led to a divergence in market interpretations of "whale behavior."
Some on-chain analysis institutions point out that "a decrease in large deposits usually means reduced selling pressure," while TechFlowDaily emphasizes that whale activity on Binance is still viewed by many traders as a key observation window for sentiment and liquidity. It is important to note that "deposits" here only represent chips being transferred to the exchange, not equivalent to completed sell transactions, nor can they be directly converted into specific selling quantities.
Incentive Analysis
From a news perspective, there have been no disruptive changes in the Bitcoin narrative in December; rather, it has been a continuation and consolidation of the previous upward logic. Against this backdrop, while prices are consolidating at high levels, the structural funding behavior on-chain has begun to "slow down." Rather than being simply bullish or bearish, it can be seen as a phase of cooling trading willingness.
On the funding side, CryptoQuant's data showing a drop from $7.88 billion to $3.86 billion indicates a significant contraction in the inflow behavior of large addresses marked as whales to Binance. If we view "transfers to exchanges" as potential preparations for selling or liquidity reserves, this decline suggests that in the short term, more large holders are choosing to keep their chips on-chain, resulting in a relative decrease in the scale of chips available for immediate sale compared to earlier.
On the emotional level, the market's focus on whale behavior itself amplifies the impact of this data. On one hand, the interpretation of "decreased deposits = eased selling pressure" provides psychological support for bulls; on the other hand, the single large deposit of $466 million is seen by some traders as "someone preparing at high levels," reinforcing a cautious mindset towards tops and hedging behavior. This emotional tug-of-war ultimately manifests in prices being compressed within a relatively limited range, rather than following a one-sided trend.
Deep Logic
If we only look at prices, it is easy to conclude that there is a "high-level consolidation with a flat trend"; however, overlaying price data with whale deposit data reveals deeper structural changes. A sharp decline in whale deposits to exchanges during high price phases is often seen as a signal that potential selling pressure is shifting from "actively releasing" to "passively observing."
In the on-chain analysis framework, large addresses transferring Bitcoin to exchanges are typically interpreted as:
- Preparing to sell in the spot market or cashing out in batches;
- Providing margin for participating in derivatives positions or hedging base positions;
- Conducting fund transfers and consolidations between exchanges or internally.
Conversely, when such deposit behaviors significantly decrease, it indicates:
On one hand, a weakened willingness to actively push chips into the secondary market liquidity pool in the short term, providing an on-chain explanation for the "absence of severe sell-offs at high levels"; on the other hand, it may also suggest that large holders are temporarily choosing to "wait and see" within the current price range, neither rushing to cash out nor to significantly increase their holdings.
On a macro level, December itself is within the traditional financial market's year-end settlement window, where institutions often need to rebalance between risk assets and cash-like assets, which naturally suppresses large-scale new positions or reductions. At this time point, with Bitcoin approaching $90,000, large holders and institutions choosing to reduce trading frequency and decrease large deposits to exchanges aligns with the logic of "first locking in performance, then adjusting in the new year."
On-chain data plays the role of a "structural indicator" here: it reminds the market that the current high-level consolidation is not being forcibly held under extreme selling pressure, but rather resembles a tug-of-war between bulls and bears within a limited volatility range, structurally neither out of control nor absolutely safe.
Bull-Bear Game
In the tug-of-war between bulls and bears, the sharp decline in whale deposits, the single large deposit of $466 million, and the floating profits of short positions in derivatives collectively paint a picture full of tension. Both bulls and bears are choosing to "continue the game rather than exit" at high levels, making the interpretation of whale behavior closer to "structural adjustment" rather than "trend termination."
From the bull's perspective, the supporting arguments mainly focus on two points:
First, the inflow scale recorded by CryptoQuant dropping from $7.88 billion to $3.86 billion is viewed by many analysis institutions as a phase of eased selling pressure; second, Bitcoin's price stabilizing in the $85,000–$90,000 range indicates that even in the environment of reduced whale deposits, the market can still maintain high-level support and holding demand without large-scale panic selling. This combination is interpreted by bulls as "high-level consolidation, structure still acceptable."
From the bear's perspective, pressure has not disappeared. Arkham has detected that some swing traders still hold floating profits of about $12.5 million in BTC short positions, indicating that within the current price range, some funds are still choosing to bet on downward movement or at least a larger correction. On the other hand, the single large deposit of $466 million gives bears the impression that "someone is preparing for hedging or reducing positions at high levels," even if this interpretation cannot be confirmed on-chain.
Additionally, the long-term actions of enterprises and treasury departments add a time dimension mismatch to this game. Genius Group recently announced the acquisition of an Indonesian content studio, and from traditional market disclosure documents, this type of layout is related to its Bitcoin-related assets and brand narrative, leaning more towards long-term configuration and expansion rather than short-term price speculation. This means:
On one end, enterprises and institutions are making asset allocations within a multi-year narrative framework; on the other end, whales, large holders, and leveraged funds are speculating within a few thousand dollars of price fluctuations. The result of these two overlapping clocks is that the signals of short-term on-chain funding behavior are often "filtered" by long-term narratives, thus manifesting as high but not extreme volatility on the price side.
In terms of ripple effects, changes in whale deposits not only affect the selling pressure expectations for BTC itself but also transmit through risk preferences to other asset sectors. When the market perceives Bitcoin's high-level structure as relatively controllable, some funds may continue to seek returns on other tokens; however, once large deposits are interpreted as "preparing for significant reductions," risk preferences may contract overall.
Outlook
Based on the current data, a more reasonable approach is to understand this round of whale behavior as a "structural signal" rather than a "directional answer." With whale deposits to Binance decreasing from $7.88 billion to $3.86 billion and prices maintaining a range of $85,000–$90,000, the market is in a state of "high but not extremely enthusiastic," with high volatility energy accumulating rather than being released.
In the short term, it is worth continuously monitoring three types of data and phenomena:
First, the subsequent deposit trend of whales to exchanges, whether it continues to remain at relatively low levels or shows a significant rebound; second, whether large single deposits at the level of $466 million increase, and whether they form a clearer correlation with short-term price fluctuations; third, whether structural changes in floating profits of short and long positions in the derivatives market will trigger concentrated liquidations in one direction, amplifying volatility.
In the medium to long term, Bitcoin's core narrative still revolves around macro liquidity, institutional allocation, corporate treasury, and technological evolution, with on-chain whale behavior being just one important but limited observation window. Given the continuously changing macro environment, interest rate expectations, and overall performance of risk assets, a single indicator is unlikely to provide a "certain" price direction.
For participants using on-chain data, it is more important to establish a clear framework: viewing whale deposits as observational tools for potential selling pressure and liquidity structure, used to identify phase structural changes and emotional turning points, rather than treating any single deposit or withdrawal as a directly applicable buy or sell signal. The greatest value of the current data lies in reminding the market that at the high level approaching $90,000, Bitcoin has not entered an extreme phase of "universal cashing out" or "mindless accumulation," but is instead in a wait-and-see interval interwoven with the forces of bulls and bears, time cycles, and macro rhythms.
This article is based on publicly available on-chain data and market information for structural analysis and does not constitute any investment advice. Future trends will still depend on multiple variables such as the macro environment, derivatives structure, spot demand, and policy expectations. Continuous tracking and updating of data are far more critical than one-time conclusions.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
