In the face of macro uncertainty and sector rotation troubling the cryptocurrency market, a piece of news from regulatory authorities has cut through the silence of the DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) sector like a bolt of lightning. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a "No-Action Letter" to the Solana-based DePIN project Fuse Crypto, clarifying that its FUSE token will not be considered a security due to its strong utility value rather than investment expectations. This event quickly gained traction, not only triggering significant price fluctuations of related tokens but also potentially establishing a key milestone for the compliance path of the entire cryptocurrency industry.

Behind the Price Fluctuations: The Capital Resonance in the DePIN Sector

The market's reaction to regulatory signals is always the most direct. According to on-chain and exchange data, within 24 hours of the official confirmation of the SEC's "No-Action Letter" (Evidence 1, 2), the price of the FUSE token saw an astonishing increase. Its price surged from about $0.12 before the announcement to a peak of $0.21, with a daily increase of over 75%. Accompanying the price rise was an exponential increase in trading volume, with the total trading volume of FUSE trading pairs on major centralized and decentralized exchanges skyrocketing by over 1500%, indicating a high level of market attention and FOMO (Evidence 6).

This wave of enthusiasm was not limited to FUSE itself but quickly spread to the entire Solana ecosystem and even the broader DePIN sector. As an important component of the Solana ecosystem, other DePIN concept tokens also experienced a noticeable "rising tide" effect. For example, tokens from projects like Helium (HNT) and Render (RNDR), which are also deployed on Solana, recorded increases of 15% to 20% within 48 hours of the announcement. Data shows that the total value locked (TVL) in DePIN protocols on the Solana chain saw a net inflow of about $50 million in a short period, indicating that investors are reassessing the value and compliance certainty of this sector.

From a more micro perspective, the number of active addresses holding FUSE tokens increased by nearly 300% after the announcement, signaling a clear rise in user activity and interest. Additionally, the number of large addresses holding over $100,000 in FUSE increased by 45%, which is often interpreted as a sign of "smart money" or institutional investors entering the market. The rapid influx of capital and the dramatic price fluctuations together form the core picture of the current market: a sector-wide rally ignited by a regulatory breakthrough is unfolding.

How a "No-Action Letter" Ignited the Market

To understand why the market reacted so intensely, it is essential to clarify the true significance of the SEC's "No-Action Letter." This letter means that after review, SEC staff believe that based on the information submitted by Fuse Crypto and its token model, they would not recommend the commission take enforcement action against it. The key lies in the reasoning— the SEC recognizes that the core value of the FUSE token lies in its "utility" within the DePIN network, rather than as an investment tool that leads to profit expectations (Evidence 2, 3).

This is particularly valuable against the backdrop of the SEC's generally tough regulatory stance towards the cryptocurrency industry in recent years. For a long time, the "Howey Test" regarding whether a token is a security has hung over most projects like the sword of Damocles. Although the SEC's decision does not have the force of legal precedent, it provides a clear, referenceable "safe harbor" model: if a token's design is highly focused on actual use functions within the network and deliberately downplays its investment attributes, it may avoid being classified as a security.

The success of Fuse Crypto lies at the heart of its tokenomics design. The FUSE token is primarily used for paying network services, incentivizing nodes to contribute physical resources, and participating in network governance. Its distribution mechanism and marketing narrative are strictly centered around "utility," contrasting sharply with many projects that primarily promote "wealth appreciation." Therefore, when well-known KOLs like @CryptoWhale and @DeFiGuru (Evidence 4, 5) pointed out that this is a "huge victory for DePIN utility tokens" and that "regulators are beginning to recognize real utility," they touched on the core pain points of the market. This is not just a positive development for one project but potentially provides a compliance path for the entire DePIN sector and even broader Web3 application layer projects.

A Beacon in the Regulatory Fog: Precedents, Narratives, and Ecological Value

Placing the Fuse event in a larger context, its significance far exceeds short-term price fluctuations. First, from a macro regulatory environment perspective, since the approval of the Bitcoin spot ETF, the market has been searching for signals of the next regulatory breakthrough. The SEC's investigation into Ethereum and lawsuits against Coinbase and Binance have filled the market with uncertainty. Although Fuse's "No-Action Letter" is merely a "non-prosecution recommendation," it releases a rare positive signal in a harsh regulatory atmosphere, indicating that there is room for differentiation within the SEC regarding "purely utility-based tokens."

Second, this greatly strengthens the narrative logic of the DePIN sector. DePIN itself emphasizes "real-world assets" and "utility value," with its core being to connect dispersed physical devices (such as sensors, hard drives, and bandwidth) into a functional network through token incentives. The Fuse event provides the strongest regulatory endorsement for this narrative. It tells the market: DePIN is not just a hype concept about the future of the Internet of Things; its business model and token model have found a template that may be accepted by regulators. This is undoubtedly a significant encouragement for attracting traditional capital and developers seeking compliance paths.

Finally, this is a strategic victory for the Solana ecosystem. Solana has attracted numerous DePIN projects due to its high performance and low cost. The positive feedback from the SEC regarding Fuse will undoubtedly strengthen Solana's position as the "preferred public chain for DePIN." This will not only attract more quality DePIN projects to build on Solana but also enhance investor confidence in the entire Solana ecosystem's assets, creating a positive feedback loop of value. As KOL @CryptoWhale stated, this could "greatly promote the development of the Solana ecosystem" (Evidence 4).

"Golden Template" or "Isolated Case": Core Disagreements Between Bulls and Bears

Despite the generally optimistic market sentiment, calm analysts must recognize the points of divergence surrounding this event, which are at the core of the bull-bear battle.

The bullish perspective is clear and powerful:

1. Precedent Effect: The success of Fuse will become a "golden template." Other DePIN projects, especially those that also emphasize utility, can mimic its legal framework and token design to seek similar regulatory certainty. This will initiate a wave of "compliance tide" for DePIN projects and unlock a significant amount of institutional capital that had previously been on the sidelines due to regulatory risks.
2. Value Reassessment: The market will begin to classify tokens more finely, with those possessing real, verifiable utility receiving a "compliance premium." The DePIN sector, due to its close ties to the physical world, will benefit overall from this round of value reassessment.
3. Ecological Benefits: Solana, as a fertile ground for compliance innovation, will continue to attract capital inflows into its ecological tokens (SOL) and DePIN projects, creating a "Davis Double Play" effect.

However, bears or cautious investors also present compelling arguments:

1. Case Specificity: The "No-Action Letter" is based on the specific facts and circumstances submitted by Fuse Crypto and is not universally applicable. The SEC could entirely determine that other DePIN projects' models are fundamentally different from Fuse's, leading to different regulatory measures. Viewing it as a "get out of jail free card" for all DePIN projects is overly optimistic.
2. Dynamic Nature of Regulation: The SEC's stance is not set in stone. Future policy changes or leadership transitions could lead to a reversal in views on such issues. The "No-Action Letter" can be revoked; it only provides a sense of security for the moment, not a permanent legal exemption.
3. "Sell the News" Risk: After a short-term price surge driven by sentiment, the market may face profit-taking pressure. Once the initial excitement fades, if no further projects receive similar treatment, market attention may shift, leading to a price correction for related tokens. The community's existing "skepticism about long-term impacts" (Evidence 6) reflects this concern.

Path Dependence and Future Variables: The Next Step for the DePIN Narrative

Looking ahead, the Fuse event undoubtedly sets a new starting point for the development trajectory of the DePIN sector, but it also introduces new variables.

Short-term (1-3 months): The market will be in a digestion and verification phase. After experiencing an initial surge, the price of the FUSE token may enter a period of high-level consolidation or correction to solidify a new value center. Traders need to be wary of the "sell the news" risk. The market's focus will be on observing whether other DePIN projects, particularly those within the Solana ecosystem, publicly announce that they are applying or planning to apply for similar reviews with the SEC. Any related news could become a new trading catalyst.

Medium to Long-term (6-12 months): The path has become evident, and the key lies in whether a "path dependence" can form. If within the next six months, we see a second or third DePIN project receive positive feedback from the SEC, the effectiveness of the "Fuse template" will be confirmed. This will fundamentally change the valuation logic of the DePIN sector, transforming it from a high-risk, high-narrative segment into one with greater certainty and compliance advantages. The potential opportunity lies in positioning early in high-quality projects that are most similar to Fuse in terms of token model and legal structure.

The potential risks are equally clear. The biggest risk is that this event ultimately proves to be just an "isolated case" that cannot be replicated. This would severely undermine market confidence, leading to capital flowing out of the DePIN sector. Additionally, the macroeconomic environment, particularly the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, remains the largest variable affecting the entire cryptocurrency market. Even if the DePIN sector enjoys regulatory benefits, it may struggle to stand alone if the overall market enters a bear cycle.

In summary, the SEC's "No-Action Letter" for Fuse is a far-reaching event that lights a faint but crucial beacon for the cryptocurrency industry exploring in the regulatory fog. It validates the value proposition of "utility is king" and may open a new competitive dimension centered on compliance and practicality. For investors, understanding the deep logic of this event and discerning the viewpoints of both bulls and bears will be key to grasping future opportunities and risks in the DePIN sector.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。