Recent major benefits for Sidekick:

▌Official announcement of a joint event with the open-source AGI project @SentientAGI

▌$K listed on Kraken

Stimulated by these benefits, $K saw an intraday increase of nearly 90%, but its circulating market value still only exceeds $8 million.

I previously envisioned Sidekick becoming the Kaito of the video/live streaming field. Although this collaboration with Sentient is a positive signal, it also exposes two issues:

First, the incentive intensity is insufficient. The internal testing code from Sentient can only attract streamers who are interested in the project itself but lack opportunities for internal testing, which indirectly indicates that Sidekick has limited bargaining power in collaboration negotiations.

Second, there is a lack of differentiated incentives. All participating streamers receive the same benefits, with no gradient reward mechanism based on content quality. This approach fails to effectively filter high-quality creators and makes it difficult to form a positive cycle of continuous improvement in content quality.

In the short term, I believe Sidekick needs to:

- Establish a more refined content quality assessment system

- Design a differentiated incentive mechanism based on performance

- Expand more B-end collaborations to enhance platform bargaining power

In the long term, the success of the LiveFi track depends on whether it can truly solve the content homogenization problem of traditional InfoFi and create value experiences for users that go beyond mere speculation.

From this perspective, Sidekick's exploration direction is correct.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。