A sudden capital frenzy is pushing Solana to the center of the cryptocurrency world’s discourse. At the beginning of 2024, Multicoin Capital, in collaboration with well-known institutions like Galaxy Digital and Jump Crypto, announced a private placement investment of up to $1.65 billion into Solana's Decentralized Autonomous Treasury (DAT) strategy. Not only that, but Multicoin co-founder Kyle Samani also took on the role of chairman of Solana treasury company Forward Industries and added a personal investment of $25 million.

In a context where Bitcoin and Ethereum are still viewed by most as the "crypto orthodoxy," this gamble undoubtedly pierced through the market's calm like a bullet. Doubts, adoration, and speculation followed. Who is Samani? What does Solana have to offer? Is the so-called "real yield" a financial innovation or just another narrative game?

Kyle Samani is not an ordinary fund partner. Since 2018, when Solana was still in its seed round, Multicoin had already made a bold bet. Industry speculation suggests that its early investment returns have reached thousands of times. Samani is known not only for his keen ability to capture market trends but also as the "king of calls"—a master storyteller who can package complex technical logic into compelling narratives. He understands that crypto investment is not just about technical strength but also a battle for discourse power. This time, the core narrative he tailored for Solana is "real yield."

The so-called "real yield" refers to the returns that holders receive from staking SOL tokens, generated by actual economic activities on the blockchain, rather than just the bubble returns from inflationary issuance. According to current data, the annualized staking yield on the Solana network is about 8.05%. Of this, 6.19% comes from network inflation incentives, while 1.86% comes from real on-chain economic activities and MEV (Miner Extractable Value).

In contrast, Ethereum's staking yield is about 3.21%, with the vast majority coming from issuance rather than fee income; Bitcoin does not have a native yield mechanism at all. Within this comparative framework, Samani further describes SOL as a "yield-bearing currency stock," possessing the liquidity attributes of currency while also capturing cash flow through the growth of the underlying network, much like a stock. All of this strikes at the heart of traditional institutional investors. This is also the narrative foundation that allowed for the rapid assembly of $1.65 billion.

Samani outlines a clear logical chain for this gamble, built on three key pillars:

First, cash flow generation capability. Solana, with its high throughput and extremely low fees, is attracting a large number of high-frequency trading DApps and institutional users, and its on-chain revenue is rapidly moving away from a purely inflationary model towards a "fee-driven" model.

Second, value return mechanism. Because Solana uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) mechanism, the vast majority of fees and MEV income are redistributed to stakers rather than node operators. This design makes capital return more concentrated and highlights the "shareholder status" of holders.

Third, self-reinforcing cycle. Institutions like Multicoin are not just investors; they are deeply integrated with the Solana ecosystem by establishing treasury companies and taking on core positions. Capital injection brings liquidity, liquidity drives up token prices, rising prices enhance staking yields, and yields attract more capital—a perfect closed loop seems to have formed.

However, behind the logic lies undeniable risks, especially challenges from regulation. Currently, the U.S. SEC is intensifying its scrutiny of Staking-as-a-Service and stablecoins. If SOL is deemed a security—just as it was alleged in the collective lawsuit following the 2022 FTX collapse—then the entire narrative of "yield-bearing currency stock" would face a devastating blow.

On the other hand, the European MiCA framework and Hong Kong's stablecoin licensing system are gradually being implemented, raising higher compliance requirements for cross-border capital flows and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). If Solana's proposed Decentralized Autonomous Treasury (DAT) begins to execute asset allocation and yield reinvestment operations, it is highly likely to touch the red lines of traditional securities law and cross-border capital regulation.

In addition, the macroeconomic environment is also not optimistic. Global capital costs remain high, and the overall valuation of risk assets is under pressure. The $1.65 billion private placement is just the beginning; for Solana to maintain continuous capital inflow and stable rising token prices, it must constantly create new narratives and maintain high visibility—this is precisely the ability that Samani excels at but is also the most dangerous.

After the announcement, the market reacted swiftly. The trading volume of SOL surged in a short time, and intense debates erupted on social media. Supporters believe this is a key step for Solana to transition from a "high-speed public chain" to a "crypto economy"; critics accuse Multicoin of repeating the speculative patterns of "high leverage, high calls, and high volatility."

The Ethereum community responded immediately, pointing out that after the future EIP-4844 and Proto-Danksharding upgrades, fee income and staking yields will significantly increase, and the narrative of real yield is not exclusive to Solana. Bitcoin maximalists continue to insist that "monetary nature is the essence of crypto assets," arguing that yield-bearing assets may introduce new centralization and systemic risks. These differences reveal a deep transformation occurring in the crypto world: competition is no longer limited to technical performance or ecosystem scale but has evolved into a multidimensional game of capital narratives, compliance strategies, and community beliefs.

For Solana to truly convert this capital gamble into long-term trust, it must answer three key questions:

Is real yield sustainable? This depends on whether its on-chain economic activities can continue to grow, rather than relying on token inflation.

Can it find a compliance path amid strict regulation? Especially how to clarify its non-security attributes and the legality of treasury operations under multiple frameworks like the SEC and MiCA.

Can it break free from a "capital-dependent" growth model? Ultimately, it must return to technical practicality and organic ecosystem growth.

What Samani and his Multicoin are undertaking is undoubtedly a high-risk, high-reward narrative experiment. They are trying to position Solana as a "yield-bearing currency stock," challenging the dual hegemony of BTC and ETH in terms of value and narrative.

However, the true crypto revolution has never been just a game of capital. It concerns whether technology can be implemented, whether trust can be established, and whether the ecosystem can be sustained. $1.65 billion can buy time and attention, but it cannot buy true belief and value. The ultimate answer to this gamble does not depend on whether Samani can tell a good story, but on whether Solana can write a truly participatory, sustainable, and trustworthy new financial chapter.

Related: Bitcoin (BTC) is hovering at $116,000, and whales are starting to sell again.

Original article: “Disrupting BTC/ETH? Can Solana's '8% Real Yield' Myth Support a $1.65 Billion Bet?”

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。