Do not believe, verify.

Infrared officially conducted an experiment comparing the operational performance of the iBERA verification scheme with independent validators under different scenarios. Let's start with the conclusion:

In mid-to-high cost operational scenarios, iBERA wins. This advantage is particularly evident when infrastructure costs exceed $2,500 per month;

In scenarios with large stakes (staking over 10 million BERA), independent validators excel, showing higher competitive returns.

A brief explanation (in case some readers are unaware of the background): iBERA is a liquid staking solution for the Bear Chain launched by Infrared. Users can stake BERA to receive iBERA, maintaining token liquidity (widely applicable and integrated in DeFi) while still earning staking rewards.

Given that independent validators require significant financial and time investment, along with a high level of technical expertise, in most scenarios, the iBERA verification scheme is superior to independent validators.

The advantages mainly come from the following aspects:

Higher treasury incentive capture efficiency: iBERA dynamically optimizes BGT reward distribution through an automated system, while independent validators are limited to a single strategy.

Dynamic BGT strategy optimization: iBERA flexibly switches between boost and re-staking strategies based on real-time network conditions, while independent validators need to make manual decisions, which is inefficient.

Elimination of infrastructure costs: Independent validators incur monthly operational expenses of $1,000 to $5,000, while iBERA users do not bear this cost.

Infrared sits firmly in the top position of the Bear Chain ecosystem.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。