I just saw NEAR's latest proposal, and I have some thoughts. NEAR is quite an early project and performed very well in the last cycle, but with the market's correction and the flourishing of public chains, it has faced some pressure. Nevertheless, NEAR has consistently ranked among the top two public chains in terms of active users on Dapp Radar, indicating a solid user base.

Of course, for friends in the crypto space, price surges are the ultimate goal. Therefore, this proposal aims to reduce the maximum annual inflation rate of $NEAR from 5% to 2.5%, thereby decreasing the net issuance speed of tokens and reducing sell-offs in the market. Moreover, given the current context of increasing activity on the NEAR chain, rewarding users through inflation may not be the best choice; excessive token issuance could undermine long-term value. If it can incorporate a fee-burning mechanism, allowing NEAR to gradually enter a deflationary phase, it would have a positive impact on the price.

Additionally, NEAR continues to make strides in areas such as AI Agents, NEAR Intents, and chain abstraction. The goal is to endow the token with more practical use value by lowering inflation, releasing liquidity that was previously locked due to inflation incentives, and guiding users from locking up tokens to using (consuming) them. This would create a closed loop of "usage to burning to scarcity."

Furthermore, NEAR's development in the AI field is quite promising, as it is the second-largest holding in Grayscale's decentralized AI fund, indicating that the traditional market sees further opportunities for NEAR in decentralized AI development.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。