The first half resonates with my thoughts, but there is an essential difference between me and the artists. Whether as content creators or KOLs, the essence should be to serve the users, not to serve influence. Only better content can form influence based on the track.

For example, @KuiGas, Teacher Fengmi has deep research in the fields of cat petting and DeFi, but asking him to explain the business logic of Curve may not be suitable. Similarly, @jason_chen998 focuses more on products and technology; my knowledge of L2 comes from him, but asking him to speak on U.S. Treasury bonds might also be pushing it. Then there's @BTW0205, Old Wu, who does very well in arbitrage and DeFi, and is very stable in bottom-fishing $BTC, but asking him to buy memes may not be his strong suit.

Therefore, the essence of Twitter should be in content; everything should be based on content to serve users, rather than the other way around, where KOLs influence users. This is incorrect, especially when any token issuance or "money" involvement by KOLs forces users to consume. Personally, I believe this is backwards.

Paid knowledge, paid groups, and even trading groups are all normal, as everyone has put in hard work. However, if the essence of content output is solely to make money from users, it may not lead to long-term success. If one is truly making money, it should be by helping users earn money in the market; at least, that's how I see it.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。