💥[Facing the strictest witch in L0 history, what should we do?]

I only had time this afternoon to carefully read the "Witch Self-Reporting" from @LayerZero_Labs, the main cleansing rules:

1. Self-reporting retains 15% of the airdrop allocation.
2. Reporting others retains 10% of the airdrop allocation.
3. Using NFT cross-chain platforms such as Merkly, L2Pass, L2Marathon may be marked as a witch.

Self-reporting and mutual accusation, the web3 version of the prisoner's dilemma, the project side is indeed becoming more and more playful!

Now there is a problem. Trash TX may be judged as a witch, small amounts may also be judged, cross-chain may also be judged, multiple addresses may also be judged, very ambiguous. It can be certain that these self-reporting addresses will definitely be shared with other project airdrops in the future, just like what HOP did, which is equivalent to being wasted.

I am more inclined to the fishing law enforcement of this self-reporting mechanism in L0. Personally, I do not recommend [self-reporting], which is highly likely to affect the survival rate of one's own address in the next airdrop. If it's dead, it's dead, and it's not meaningful to take 15% of the minimum living guarantee.

So what the group members said is correct:

The biggest beneficiary of this wave in LayerZero is actually the studio's workers. The best way to play is to report the boss's address and take away 10% of the reward. This is the rise and victory of the proletariat! 😂

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。