The airdrop witch filtering rules of L0 fully utilize the mechanism of prediction markets and cleverly set the game rules of (0.15, 0) and (0, +x), guiding the witch's self-detonation trend and the new Web3 witch-hunting movement.

A free opinion market composed of rational individuals driven by interests often proves to be more accurate and effective than mathematical models constructed using on-chain address graph relationship clustering analysis. This is the logic behind the establishment of prediction markets such as Polymarket and prediction market governance like Metadao.

In such a system environment, the wool party has no resistance, and the smelly penguins can easily achieve the set goal of airdropping to users rather than airdropping to farmers.

But the question is, who defines the users, and who defines the airdrop farmers? For example, Starknet regards those who deposit 0.005 ETH before the snapshot date as users, while defining users who truly interact with DeFi as airdrop farmers.

As the creator of the airdrop rules, the choice of L0's Dev should be to maximize the interests of the Dev, similar to Starknet, rather than maximizing the interests of users or the community.

As a result, in the upcoming one-month Web3 witch-hunting movement, L0's 5 million+ historical interaction addresses will be forced to participate in a game of manipulation by the smelly penguins.

At present, L0's ZK light node + oracle cross-chain bridge architecture is somewhat outdated, and the chain abstraction track has also become crowded, evolving into a game of competing BD capabilities and grant strength. After killing the witch, it is uncertain whether L0's real user data can enter the top 5 of the cross-chain bridge rankings.

Entering the secondary market for trading in this state, L0 will most likely replicate the trend of W.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。