1⃣ There is no necessary connection between listing on an exchange and subsequent market trends.

2⃣ The person behind setting up a money laundering scheme doesn't care at all about the ownership of this coin. After they have unloaded their goods, they don't care who plays with the coin. The future development of this coin depends on its owner.

3⃣ In the long-term turnover, if this "shell" is noticed by powerful capital, it is very common for them to come in to absorb funds and manipulate the market.

The "owner" of $BONK has changed hands 3 or 4 times…

The current $PEPE is also not the same as the original $PEPE.

4⃣ Common sense for making money:

Centralized exchange = address generator + coin mixer

Money-making studios often release an "exclusive native coin" on a DEX, diverting funds to hundreds or thousands of wallets through swaps, in order to counter "anti-witch" measures.

The operation steps are as follows:

1/ Wallet U creates a smart contract for a "native coin" (such as $DONKI) and adds liquidity on a DEX on a certain public chain (such as zkXXXc).

2/ Wallets A, B, and C each buy 10U to 20U of $DONKI.

3/ Wallet W buys $DONKI for 10,000 to 100,000 dollars, driving up the price.

4/ Wallets A, B, and C sell $DONKI to obtain "clean" funds ranging from thousands to tens of thousands of dollars.

In this way, the project team about to airdrop tokens cannot determine the "witch" relationship between wallets U, A, B, C, and W.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。