In Japan's most conservative and compliance-driven financial corner, Progmat made what seems like a "counter-current" decision: one of the largest domestic securities token issuance and management platforms no longer locks assets on the closed ledger of the R3 Corda 5 private permissioned chain, but instead migrates all managed securities tokens to a dedicated Avalanche Layer 1 public chain network. On July 13, 2026, the completion of the migration was officially confirmed, with the numbers written in the announcement: over 452 billion yen, approximately 2.7 billion dollars in securities tokens, crossed the boundaries between chains within a regulatory framework, quickly labeled by the industry as a "milestone in Japan's compliance tokenized assets embracing public chains," and categorized as one of the largest RWA on-chain cases in Asia to date. This not only signifies a shift in the technical route from private chains to public chains but also represents, for the first time at such a large scale, traditional finance exposing compliant assets in an open network's transparent environment under Japan's strict regulatory system. The resulting expectations are for liquidity and interoperability, along with new rounds of contention over on-chain data visibility, authority control, and boundaries of liability. Whether this migration will be recorded as an opportunity or a risk case hinges on whether Japanese regulators and the public chain world can find a lasting balance under the same set of rules.
From Private Chain Corda to Public Chain Avalanche
For Progmat, migrating from the R3 Corda 5 private permissioned chain to the dedicated Avalanche Layer 1 public chain is not merely about moving the "ledger" from one database to another; it is a choice from a closed club to an open block. During the Corda phase, business operations occurred within a clearly defined permissioned network involving local financial institutions, with asset issuance, settlement, and custody locked within limited nodes, and interconnections primarily among participants within the same system. After the migration, securities tokens still operating under a strict regulatory framework are placed in a public chain environment aimed at broader participants. Even though this Avalanche network is "dedicated" to Progmat and its collaborating institutions, it is logically connected to a larger public chain ecosystem, and assets no longer circulate solely within a closed circle.
This structural inversion reflects a bet on the value of openness and connectivity. Progmat and its partners are clearly not satisfied with being "self-sufficient" on a single private chain; they wish to maintain contract behavior and regulatory constraints while allowing compliant assets the possibility of interfacing with the outside world—regardless of whether this interface falls on the level of technical tools or new business scenarios, it means the circulation radius is redrawn. For Japan's regulators, this is also a boundary redrawing: these are still regulated securities tokens, still issued and circulated within existing rules, but when they migrate for the first time at a scale of approximately 452 billion yen from a private chain to a public chain, this decision itself brings forward questions like "what can be done on an open network, and who is responsible for on-chain actions." How regulators and the public chain world delineate an acceptable safe line on this dedicated Avalanche network will determine whether this migration is seen as a successful sample or a cautionary tale from which to learn.
The Seamless Migration of 452 Billion Yen
When regulatory boundaries are defined on paper, actually moving approximately 452 billion yen of compliant assets from a private permissioned chain to a dedicated Avalanche public chain network is a practical test of engineering and organization capabilities. Progmat emphasizes that this is not simply swapping the underlying ledger from "Corda" to "Avalanche," but rather a complete rewrite of the entire platform architecture—rearranging the whole process of issuance, registration, settlement, custody, etc., under Japan's strict securities token regulatory framework, while also accommodating various financial institution system interfaces tied to it. The difficulty does not lie in "which chain to migrate to," but in "silently replacing the entire underlying infrastructure while all business operations continue." Official information states that during the migration implementation phase, the related financial institutions' businesses were not interrupted, meaning that for these institutions, system launches, report outputs, and customer services proceeded as usual, yet they were already functioning on a completely different infrastructure.
The zero downtime behind this is a near-rigorous requirement for consistency in contract behavior. Before the migration, how these securities tokens accrued interest, recorded rights, and handled maturity and redemption on Corda was already embedded in the risk control and operational processes of local financial institutions; after migration, if the contracts on Avalanche display even slight deviations in boundary conditions, sequence of events, or triggers, it could make existing clients and connected systems perceive differences or even trigger compliance risks. Thus, Progmat had to ensure that the existing securities token contract behavior remained unchanged during the chain migration while rewriting the platform architecture, enabling users and partners to "see no differences." In the realm of compliant RWAs, such large-scale and seamless experience migrations are extremely rare; it is not just a singular event but rather a demonstration to other large financial institutions that, under unchanged regulatory rules, uninterrupted business, and continuous contract behavior, it is still possible to complete an upgrade and migration of the underlying chain.
Public Chain Experiments Under Japan's Regulatory Red Lines
For Progmat, this migration is not a technical gamble to "escape regulation" but rather a route adjustment made within Japan's existing financial regulatory framework. The securities tokens managed by Progmat are already issued and circulated under strict local regulation; this migration has not altered the legal nature of the assets, nor has it stepped outside the existing compliance fence; it simply replaces the underlying ledger that records and settles these assets from the R3 Corda 5 private permissioned chain with the dedicated Avalanche Layer 1 public chain network. In other words, the regulatory red line has not shifted outwards by even a step, but within this red line, the underlying technology has been replaced with a more open public chain architecture.
It is precisely for this reason that the transfer of approximately 452 billion yen, or about 2.7 billion dollars, stands out as particularly symbolic. Among compliant tokenized assets in Japan, this is currently one of the largest public chain migrations and is also a rare case of nearly 3 billion dollars of compliant RWA being concentrated on-chain in the Asia region. The official narrative deliberately emphasizes the phrase "important milestone," conveying the message that is not hidden: public chains are no longer merely viewed as "high-risk external worlds," but can be incorporated as part of compliant financial infrastructure without breaking regulatory frameworks. For other institutions in Japan and even Asia, this case provides a reusable path—first completing the issuance and management of securities tokens within the domestic regulatory system, then migrating the underlying ledger to the public chain without changing regulatory requirements, and using technical architecture rewriting to interface with a more open ecosystem, thereby proving that as long as systems are designed around existing regulatory red lines, achieving the goal of "compliance on public chains" is possible.
Avalanche Seizes Compliance RWA Heights
For Avalanche, Progmat's migration of over 452 billion yen, approximately 2.7 billion dollars worth of securities tokens from the R3 Corda 5 private permissioned chain to the dedicated Avalanche Layer 1 does not merely represent a new business; it sets a benchmark in the compliant RWA arena. The migration target is not a shared mainnet, but a dedicated public chain network customized for Progmat and its partners, meaning these Japanese financial institutions can carry securities token assets in an independent environment while retaining sufficient rule boundaries and operational dominance outside the open nature of the public chain. This structure essentially disassembles "public chain" into customizable underlying infrastructure: performance can be tailored to existing business needs, contracts and account systems can be restructured according to regulatory requirements, and compliance controls can be reinforced through the boundaries of a dedicated network, thus forming a new balance among performance, customization, and regulatory constraints. Consequently, this migration is described as an important milestone in Japan's compliance tokenized assets officially embracing the public chain ecosystem and is seen as Avalanche's most concrete landing in the direction of compliant RWA.
The impact of this landing case on the competitive landscape extends beyond a single ecosystem. It first proves to the entire industry that securities tokens, operating under a strict domestic financial regulatory framework, need not remain forever on closed private permissioned chains; the largest scale of RWA on-chain migration in Asia can be completed without interrupting the business of cooperating financial institutions, ultimately landing on a dedicated public chain network. For other public chains, this raises the entry threshold—merely providing high throughput or general smart contracts is no longer sufficient; more crucial is whether similar dedicated public chain environments can be constructed for large institutions, allowing them to enjoy open ecosystems without sacrificing compliance control; and Avalanche, through this case, has strategically occupied the narrative position of "compliance RWA high ground." Moving forward, whether this model will be reused by more traditional financial institutions or quickly replicated by other public chains will determine whether this leading edge is just a one-time template project or the starting signal of a new round of RWA competition.
Can the Japanese Sample Be Replicated Globally?
The migration by Progmat, involving large-scale compliant assets moving from the R3 Corda private permissioned chain to the dedicated Avalanche public chain, along with the official emphasis on "zero business interruption," packages a complete model: it is not only a technical architecture rewrite but also a compliance experiment completed within Japan's local securities token regulatory framework, while being externally shaped into a landmark narrative for RWA on-chain in Asia. However, once detached from Japan, which has early defined rules for securities tokens, whether this script can be directly transplanted will face the regulatory criteria of different jurisdictions: some may not accept deploying core financial infrastructure directly on open public chains, while others may require localized nodes, data, and control, necessitating a redesign of "dedicated public chains" both legally and technically. For other financial institutions, migrating billions in assets from existing permissioned chains to new public chains also means reassessing operational risks and boundaries of liability, and they may not all be willing to bear the costs of a first attempt. More realistically, the formally confirmed information remains at the migration's completion and architecture rewrite itself; whether asset categories expand, whether more participants are included, and whether standardized replication paths are offered have not yet been disclosed. Before more compliant assets truly go on-chain, Avalanche's model of a dedicated public chain for a single institution and potential similar solutions will ultimately have to undergo market tests regarding regulatory acceptance, institutional migration willingness, and long-term operational stability. The direction of these variables will determine whether the Japanese sample becomes a global consensus template or a difficult-to-replicate local experiment.
Join our community, let’s discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
