On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that the PCE price index for April was released, adding another hammer to the narrative of "high interest rates for longer." The data showed that the overall PCE rose by 3.8% year-on-year in April, further up from the approximately 3.5% level in March, recording the largest increase since May 2023; the core PCE, excluding food and energy, rose by 3.3% year-on-year, with a month-on-month increase of about 0.24% (annualized about 2.9%, pending verification), indicating that besides the Iran situation pushing energy prices up, the endogenous inflation pressure remains sticky. As one of the inflation indicators most closely watched by the Federal Reserve, with an inflation target of about 2%, this reading quickly reinforced the market's judgment that "maintaining a wait-and-see stance in the short term and a significant delay in interest rate cuts" was likely: with inflation rising again but growth not significantly slowing, the Fed is thought to be more motivated to maintain the current high interest rate range for a longer duration rather than hastily turning towards easing. For highly volatile assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, this means that the global U.S. dollar risk-free yield will remain high for a longer time, leading to an increase in discount rates and a preference for U.S. Treasuries and money market instruments, pressuring risk appetite and liquidity, thereby shifting the on-chain funding structure from offensive to defensive.
Inflation Rekindled: Prolonged High Interest Rates Forced
From the data itself, the label "inflation re-ascending" is not an exaggeration. The overall PCE rose to 3.8% year-on-year in April, not only higher than the revised figure of about 3.5% in March but also the largest increase since May 2023, significantly deviating from the Fed’s target of about 2%; the core PCE remains far above the target range at 3.3% year-on-year. Looking solely at this group of year-on-year readings, the market can easily conclude that "inflation is strengthening again, and policies need to be tougher." On a detailed basis, the month-on-month core PCE increase of about 0.24% (according to a single source) was the smallest increase in nearly five months, annualized at about 2.9%. Combined with a marginal month-on-month increase of only about 0.1% in real consumption adjusted for inflation (according to a single source), it indicates that the demand side has been suppressed by high interest rates, but price stickiness remains stubborn. This structure of "slightly soft on a month-on-month basis, high on a year-on-year basis" makes "continuing to wait and watch rather than immediately raising interest rates" a more reasonable policy baseline.
Within this framework, the key market pricing focus is no longer "whether to raise rates again," but "how long will high interest rates be maintained." After the data release, multiple media outlets pointed to the same conclusion: the April PCE reading reinforced expectations that the Fed will maintain its current high interest rate levels for a longer time. Federal Reserve Chairman Waller needs to weigh inflation stickiness against slowing growth and calm officials who are more inclined to continue interest rate hikes. For global assets, the significance of this macro variable is that as long as nominal and real rates hover at a high level, and the U.S. dollar and Treasury yields maintain a relative advantage, the discount rate for all long-duration, high-beta assets is anchored on a high plateau—this includes U.S. tech stocks, emerging market equities, and cryptocurrency assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, which need to find equilibrium price levels under higher discount rates and lower risk appetites.
Iran Pushes Up Oil Prices: How Exogenous Inflation Reshapes the Crypto Narrative
While rates are locked at high levels, the recent situation in Iran has driven up international energy prices, viewed by many media outlets as an important exogenous supply factor contributing to the renewed strength in inflation in April. Unlike inflation caused by "overheated demand," the current situation is more about "energy-driven supply-side inflation"—the prices are rising not due to strong terminal demand, but because costs are forced upwards. In April, real consumer spending adjusted for inflation rose by only about 0.1% month-on-month (according to a single source, still pending verification), and the combination of high interest rates plus rising energy costs creates a dual squeeze on real consumption and corporate profits. Historically, similar energy shocks have often been accompanied by concerns about "stagflation," where high inflation coexists with a slowdown in growth.
In this "energy inflation + growth pressure" combination, structural differentiation has emerged within traditional assets: commodities and gold are relatively resistant during supply-side inflation phases, while growth stocks that rely on forward profit discounts are more easily subjected to valuation compression. This experience is naturally analogized to Bitcoin’s "digital commodity" and "digital gold" narrative. The problem lies in that Bitcoin is also a high-beta risk asset; under the backdrop of high interest rates and a strong dollar raising discount rates, its correlation with tech growth stocks may weaken temporarily: macroeconomically, it benefits from the narrative of "hard assets hedging energy inflation," but liquidity is pulled down by high risk-free yields and profit downshifts in the stock market, making it challenging to attract sustained incremental allocations. For Ethereum and its DeFi ecosystem, on-chain yields need to be compared positively to the elevated U.S. dollar risk-free rate; exogenous energy inflation will not improve its cash flow expectations and, conversely, under the context of "high-rate + growth pressure," it will weaken its relative attractiveness, leading to a scenario where the crypto market is more prone to a "BTC remains resilient while long-duration high-beta assets face pressure" dislocation trading.
High Yield U.S. Dollar Returns: BTC and ETH Discounted Against Risk-Free Rates
With the overall PCE year-on-year rising to 3.8% and core PCE at 3.3%, under the premise that inflation remains significantly above the target of about 2%, the market is forced to adjust downwards the expected number and pace of future interest rate cuts, with the notion of maintaining high interest rates for "longer" almost becoming a consensus. This means that real interest rates adjusted for inflation have been raised, the U.S. dollar has strengthened, and the nominal yields on U.S. Treasury securities and dollar money market funds have remained historically high, forming a "risk-free return curve" characterized by certain returns and very low volatility. Under a discounting framework, the higher this curve is, the higher the discount rate for all future cash flows and forward prices, ultimately leading to a systematic downward pressure on the valuation center of high-volatility assets. Assets like BTC and ETH, which do not generate cash flows, are more likely to be viewed as "opportunity cost discounts" against high risk-free returns.
Correspondingly, there is a rapid repricing of the competitive relationship for returns. On one end, there are U.S. Treasuries and money market tools that can lock in high interest rates; on the other end, BTC and ETH only attract funds through price volatility and limited on-chain interest. The yield from collateral lending and liquidity mining in Ethereum and its DeFi ecosystem must directly benchmark against the elevated risk-free rate. When the U.S. dollar risk-free return rises, and expectations for maintaining that high level extend, if on-chain yields cannot rise in tandem, they will significantly underperform in risk-adjusted returns, prompting funds to exit high-leverage, high-beta assets in favor of shorter-duration, more certain dollar assets. Historical experience shows that during stages characterized by "rising real rates + a strong dollar, with delayed rate cut expectations," the premium for crypto derivatives often narrows, futures funding rates decline or even turn negative in phases, and on-chain lending rates contract as risk appetites cool, resulting in a decrease in overall market leverage, where BTC generally remains resilient, while ETH and long-duration crypto assets face greater discount pressure due to heavier narratives surrounding future growth.
On-Chain Dollars and Risk Aversion Migration: Who is Exiting High-Risk Positions?
As the overall PCE rose to 3.8% year-on-year, with core PCE still showing stickiness and the market pricing in "high interest rates for longer", the logic of traditional funds flowing back to U.S. dollar cash and short-term Treasuries was directly mirrored on-chain: dollar-denominated anchored assets and high liquidity mainstream currencies became the main receiving end during the contraction period. Historical phases indicate that when the Fed tightens or maintains high rates, the supply of on-chain dollar assets and the total locked value in DeFi usually slow in tandem, but asset structures tend to concentrate on “U.S. dollar anchored assets + BTC, ETH” and other high liquidity targets, while highly volatile tokens and long-duration narrative assets face larger reductions. The current round of expectation adjustments triggered by the PCE data has clearly raised the probability of this rebalancing pathway.
From a funding perspective, this means an increased demand for on-chain "dollar positions", with some liquidity that previously chased yields retreating from long-tail protocols and high-risk pools back to dollar-anchored assets. Although DeFi TVL may maintain or fluctuate slightly on the surface, the internal shift from high-risk strategies to lower-risk positions is significant, and market depth becomes more concentrated around mainstream trading pairs like BTC and ETH. For BTC and ETH themselves, institutions and large holders often cut high-leverage contracts and speculative positions during times of rising macro uncertainty, increasing their spot inventory, and managing downside risks through options, transitioning the overall trading structure from “high leverage + perpetual contracts premium” to “spot holdings + options hedging,” making these two major assets function more like "a compromise choice between liquidity core and risk avoidance assets" within the on-chain funding mix.
Switching the Trading Main Line: From Betting on Rate Cuts to Embracing Inflation Volatility
With the April overall PCE at 3.8%, core PCE at 3.3%, and the core month-on-month growth at only about 0.24% (annualized around 2.9%, pending verification) showing slight easing, and actual consumption only increasing by about 0.1% (pending verification), the macro main narrative has shifted from “rapid rate cuts” to “high interest rates for longer + exogenous inflation disturbances.” In an environment where the situation in Iran is pushing energy prices up, and supply-driven inflation is re-emerging, the Fed has more reason in the short term to maintain high rates in order to suppress inflation expectations, which along with a strong dollar raises returns on U.S. Treasuries and money market instruments, increasing discount rates on risk assets, thereby exerting pressure on the short-term pricing of high-beta assets like BTC and ETH. In the medium term, it will depend on whether this round of inflation evolves from "energy shocks + high rates suppressing growth" into "persistent concerns about fiat currency credibility": if PCE remains elevated, energy prices stay tense, and actual activity weakens, the "digital gold" attribute of BTC and the configuration value of ETH as the underlying of on-chain finance may be reinforced again; if core inflation recedes and the Fed begins to signal moderate easing, crypto assets may again be valued more as interest rate-sensitive growth risk assets. In terms of trading and allocation, subsequent tracking should focus on: PCE and its core pathway and energy price trends, inflation and rate guidance from Fed meetings and officials, as well as whether the scale of on-chain dollar assets, DeFi TVL growth rates, and futures funding rates/basis returns to expansion, thereby assessing how the weight of BTC and ETH is tilting between the narratives of "inflation hedging" and "interest rate trading vehicles".
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
Exclusive AiCoin Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive AiCoin Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
