Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

Google's quantum paper sounds the alarm, 600 billion in assets face risks.

CN
Techub News
Follow
1 hour ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

Written by: Blockchain Knight

A new paper released jointly by Google's quantum artificial intelligence and multiple parties has significantly lowered the hardware threshold for cracking the elliptic curve encryption used by Bitcoin and Ethereum, bringing the long-standing quantum security risk closer to the market. At current market prices, the affected cryptocurrency assets exceed $600 billion.

The paper indicates that algorithmically cracking the 256-bit elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem requires only 1,200-1,450 logical qubits and 70 million - 90 million Toffoli gates, corresponding to a superconducting quantum computer needing less than 500,000 physical qubits, completing the crack in just a few minutes, which is about 20 times less than previous hardware estimates.

Google emphasized that there are currently no such machines, but a researcher from the Ethereum Foundation stated that confidence in the "quantum day" in 2032 (when quantum computers have a 10% chance of cracking private keys) has significantly increased.

Google also revealed that it has collaborated with the U.S. government to utilize zero-knowledge proofs for external verification resource estimation while avoiding the disclosure of attack details.

The quantum risk for Bitcoin is primarily focused on transaction attacks and the security of its existing assets. The paper simulates an attack during the spending period, where a quantum computer can derive the private key in 9 minutes, approaching Bitcoin's average block time of 10 minutes, with a theft success rate of nearly 41%.

Worse, about 6.7 million bitcoins (approximately $444 billion, accounting for 32% of the total market value) are stored in vulnerable addresses, including 1.7 million protected by old scripts ($11.26 billion) and various dormant vulnerable bitcoins totaling 2.3 million ($15.23 billion), some of which cannot be migrated due to abandonment or loss.

In addition, while the Taproot protocol enhances privacy, it reintroduces quantum vulnerabilities due to public keys being directly embedded in scripts, and the short-term risk is focused on signatures rather than mining.

The quantum risks for Ethereum span accounts, contracts, and infrastructure. Given Ethereum's 12-second block time and fast transaction processing that relies on private memory pools, real-time transaction attacks are more challenging.

The core risk is static attacks, with fast quantum computers potentially breaking the top 1,000 Ethereum accounts (approximately $41.5 billion) within 9 days and cracking 70 core contract accounts (approximately $5.1 billion) within 15 hours.

Of greater concern is the $200 billion in stablecoins and tokenized assets on Ethereum, where attacks on the issuers, bridges, and other keys could trigger crises such as currency issuance inflation and fund freezes.

Moreover, the $30.4 billion ETH in Layer 2 and protocol value, along with $74.9 billion ETH in consensus equity, also face threats due to vulnerabilities and signature risks.

However, the industry already possesses post-quantum cryptography tools, but migration will take several years and requires protocol upgrades and adjustments in wallet behavior to reduce public key leakage and key reuse.

For the cryptocurrency market, quantum risks have shifted from theory to reality. Bitcoin must contend with settlement window pressures, while Ethereum needs to safeguard its vast contract and tokenized ecosystem. Immediately advancing the migration to post-quantum encryption has become an urgent task for the industry.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

OKX 活期简单赚币,让你的链上黄金生生不息
广告
|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by Techub News

6 minutes ago
What legal risks do perpetual contracts in the cryptocurrency sector face when compared to gold, silver, and crude oil?
18 minutes ago
2 days of free lobster deployment, over 300 major companies recruiting, nearly a hundred guests taking the stage, a wonderful review of CLAWTIME "Lobster Bureau".
26 minutes ago
How should Chinese AI companies "copy Claude Code's homework"?
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatar律动BlockBeats
2 minutes ago
Will middle management be eliminated by AI? What will the company structure of the future look like?
avatar
avatarTechub News
6 minutes ago
What legal risks do perpetual contracts in the cryptocurrency sector face when compared to gold, silver, and crude oil?
avatar
avatarTechub News
18 minutes ago
2 days of free lobster deployment, over 300 major companies recruiting, nearly a hundred guests taking the stage, a wonderful review of CLAWTIME "Lobster Bureau".
avatar
avatarTechub News
26 minutes ago
How should Chinese AI companies "copy Claude Code's homework"?
avatar
avatarTechub News
46 minutes ago
The "coming of age" of memes: It's time to step out of the house.
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink