In this week of East Eight Time, a round of valuation repricing around Tether is rapidly fermenting in the secondary market: from the previously widely quoted about 200 billion dollars, it has been lifted all the way to the 350 to 375 billion dollar range. Compared to the approximately 50 billion dollar valuation a year ago, this is nearly a sevenfold leap in value within a year, causing a strong contrast and shock in both the cryptocurrency industry and traditional finance. The market amplifies the speculation that it "may make the largest shareholder's worth exceed Buffett," while also eyeing the relatively conservative valuations provided by institutions like Forbes, questioning whether this valuation frenzy is detached from the fundamentals. The quotes in the secondary market, institutional valuations, and regulatory pricing logic are clearly misaligned. While the high valuation ignites industry confidence, it also pushes Tether into the glaring spotlight of regulatory scrutiny: is this really a repricing under consensus of funds, or a bubble inflated by emotions under information opacity?
Sevenfold Surge in a Year: Tether's Timeline and Value Contrast
● The stretching of the valuation timeline is crucial to understanding this round of frenzy: according to multiple data sources, about a year ago, Tether's valuation was still around 50 billion dollars, ranking among the top stablecoin issuers, but far from entering the list of global super giants. Subsequently, with business expansion and heightened industry attention, Forbes raised its valuation to about 200 billion dollars, placing it in the sequence of large global fintech assets. However, what truly ignited public opinion was the latest round of secondary market transactions, where the valuation was directly raised to the 350 to 375 billion dollar range, completing a jump from "a hundred billion level company" to "a multi-hundred billion level super asset" in just about a year.
● Behind different valuation standards are completely different pricing groups and narrative logics: Forbes' approximately 200 billion dollar valuation more reflects the "central price" given by traditional financial media and institutional analysts based on public information and cautious expectations, leaning towards financial verifiability and risk discounting. In contrast, the 350 to 375 billion dollar range in the secondary market is more driven by off-market equity trading, venture capital, and high-net-worth buying power. In the absence of a unified valuation model, imaginations concerning growth, monopolies, and cash flow elasticity are amplified several times, resulting in two different worlds providing significantly divergent price tags on the same asset.
● In terms of public opinion, the notion that "the largest shareholder's worth may surpass Buffett" has been continuously amplified to highlight the extremity of this valuation increase: if we roughly calculate based on the 350 billion dollar range valuation, the market begins to reference the world's top value investors, emphasizing that Tether's core shareholder's "paper wealth" could theoretically exceed Buffett. However, this is more of a dramatized relative expression rather than a rigorous wealth calculation. In the absence of publicly disclosed specific shareholding ratios, liquidity discounts, and exit paths, this benchmark serves more as a reminder—Tether is being cast as a behemoth comparable to traditional financial legends in its narrative.
Stablecoin Printing Machine? The High Imaginative Space Given by the Market
● The important narrative supporting the secondary market's willingness to assign hundreds of billions level valuation is the demand consensus for "infrastructure level USDT": in global crypto trading, off-market clearing, and risk hedging configurations, USDT has long held an absolute dominant position, regarded as the "liquidity pipeline" and "accounting unit" of the crypto world. From exchange matching, on-chain lending to cross-border fund transfers, various businesses' dependency on USDT makes the market willing to imagine Tether as an infrastructure operator that controls "tolls"—regardless of bulls or bears, the basic traffic and demand are hard to be replaced in the short term, providing a narrative fulcrum for high expected valuations.
● Recently, the overall recovery of the crypto market has further enlarged this "printing machine" imagination: as coin prices rebound and trading volumes recover, investors are re-evaluating the entities that control liquidity valves. A portion of funds is willing to assign extremely high discount space to Tether's future business expansion, potential cash flows, and new product lines. In the absence of clear financial data constraints, the linear thinking that "as long as USDT's scale grows, Tether can continue to attract capital" easily dominates pricing when emotions run high, elevating it from a "profitable good company" to a "financial infrastructure entity with unlimited growth."
● In the narrative packaging disseminated in the secondary market, Tether is increasingly being likened to the "underlying power company" of the crypto world: trading, clearing, and hedging are like mining and manufacturing that cannot do without electricity; as long as the entire industry is still in operation, it must continuously pay for this "water and power pipeline" of USDT. Such narrative naturally attracts buying interest seeking "industry Beta + stable charging rights," especially in the absence of publicly disclosed valuation model constraints, any imaginations about future expansions, scenario spillovers, and potential new income sources can be superimposed on this "stablecoin water and power company" storyline, boosting the overall valuation tolerance for Tether.
Mismatch in Numbers: The Valuation Tear Between Forbes and the Secondary Market
● When Forbes' approximately 200 billion dollar valuation encounters the 350 to 375 billion dollar range in the secondary market, the core divergence immediately surfaces: on one side, there is the relatively conservative institutional valuation central based on limited disclosure, while on the other, there are high quotes driven by emotions, combining "monopoly premium + growth imagination." The valuation gap of over 150 billion dollars between the two essentially reflects different judgments on profit quality, business sustainability, and potential regulatory risk discounts, also mirroring the fundamental divide in risk pricing culture between traditional finance and crypto capital.
● Voices increasingly demanding "more transparent financial disclosures to verify" have emerged in the market, directly targeting the focal point of valuation games: under the current circumstances of limited public information, the outside world finds it difficult to accurately judge Tether's real profitability, safety of reserve assets, and quality of liquidity, nor can they reproduce any authoritative valuation model. Financial commentators emphasize that in the absence of audited statements and detailed asset structure explanations, lifting Tether from 200 billion to 300 billion or even higher is essentially using expectations to counter uncertainty, and this confrontation, when risk events occur, may "correct" with more severe price reversals.
● In an environment lacking precise financial data and publicly available valuation methodologies, the emotionally driven characteristics of the secondary market are infinitely amplified: the optimistic side views Tether as "the charging entry point of cryptocurrency infrastructure," believing that any bullish outlook for the long-term crypto ecology should be reflected in Tether's valuation; the cautious side questions how such high pricing could easily evolve into collective delusion without clarity on profit structures, reserve quality, and regulatory boundaries. Both sides are filling the information void with their respective narratives, hence when the figures "do not align," the debate is no longer merely about one company but about the sustainability of the entire crypto valuation logic.
New Risks of Tether Under the Regulatory Magnifying Glass
● In recent years, global regulators have clearly tightened scrutiny on issuers, from anti-money laundering, consumer protection to systemic risk prevention, relevant rules are continuously tightening. Against this backdrop, Tether being pushed to a valuation height of 350 to 375 billion dollars is no longer just a market story but naturally falls into the scope of "systemic importance" discussions. Regulators are not only observing the compliance of a single product but also whether such a scale of funding hub could produce chain reactions to the broader financial system if liquidity or trust crises arise.
● The valuation surge itself may become a reason for regulators to exert further pressure: when the market is willing to assign Tether a valuation of hundreds of billions, regulators will inevitably pay more attention to the safety of reserve assets, resilience of the balance sheet, and redemption capability in extreme scenarios. The higher the valuation, the broader the potential impact; once there are runs, asset impairments, or compliance disputes, the consequences will be significantly magnified. In other words, high valuation is not only a market compliment but objectively raises the demands of regulators for its transparency, prudent governance, and risk isolation mechanisms.
● Should regulatory attitudes cool in the future, or rules surrounding issuers tighten further, the current high valuation narrative may in turn become a lever for amplifying risks: in an emotionally vibrant upcycle, investors may prefer to overlook compliance shadows, viewing regulatory noise as a "screening mechanism for willing bidders"; but once negative regulatory events or specific restrictions emerge, the beliefs that previously supported high valuations may collapse collectively in a short time, triggering a second examination of Tether's "real value," thereby leading to a rapid retraction of both price and confidence.
Viewing the Entire Crypto Funding Pipeline Through Tether’s Value
● Viewing Tether's valuation surge in a larger context can be seen as a repricing of the entire liquidity hub of the crypto market: as market conditions warm up and trading activity resumes, attention to "who controls the funding pipeline" has clearly increased, Tether's valuation rising from 50 billion to several hundred billion reflects, in a sense, investors' willingness to pay higher premiums for the "liquidity entry point." This is both a bet on future trading volumes and capital accumulation and a reward for the "infrastructure status" that has continuously operated for many years without being disrupted.
● The sharp increase in Tether's value also serves as a demonstration and pressure on other issuers, exchanges, and on-chain financial ecosystems: on one hand, it showcases to the market the imaginative space that "funding pipeline assets" can reach, inspiring more players to attempt to replicate similar narratives and compete for control over cross-chain, cross-border payments, and on-chain clearing tracks; on the other hand, such a high valuation also invisibly raises the threshold for newcomers—competing with a giant recognized as a "multi-hundred billion infrastructure" in terms of brand, liquidity, and scenario coverage becomes significantly more difficult and costly, potentially elevating the industry concentration further.
● If this "stabilizing force" viewed as the hub of crypto funding is repriced or even questioned systematically by the market in the future, its disruptive effect will far exceed the valuation fluctuations of a single company: once the price peg of USDT wavers, the first to come under pressure will be the depth of spot transactions and price stability, followed by a large number of derivative contracts collateralized or settled in USDT, then transmitting to the outer layers of DeFi lending, yield aggregation, and cross-chain liquidity pools. The current high valuation of Tether actually represents a collective bet on the robustness of the entire funding pipeline; once this bet is retracted, the resulting reaction will not merely be a typical industry correction but could initiate a stress test of the entire crypto financial structure.
Bubble or Repricing: The Landing of Tether's Valuation Surge
Tether has been pushed up from about 50 billion dollars to around 200 billion dollars in Forbes' view, and then to the 350 to 375 billion dollar range shouted out in the secondary market, evolving the narrative from "high-profit issuer" to "cryptocurrency infrastructure utility company." The tension of the long coexistence of market and institutional valuations has never disappeared. The former is more willing to pay for future stories and monopoly premiums, while the latter maintains discounts and skepticism under limited disclosure information. This tension not only manifests in numerical discrepancies but also represents a cognitive competition surrounding how crypto assets are embedded in the global financial system.
Before the financial details and reserve composition become fully transparent, the current high valuation is both a pricing of faith in Tether's business model and industry position, as well as a fragile consensus based on incomplete information. Should market sentiment shift from greed to defense, this valuation structure, supported mainly by expectations, may face a drastic reset. The key variables for the future will hinge on two clues: one is the global regulatory stance toward issuers and the boundaries of rules, and the other is the overall improvement in industry disclosure standards and audit transparency. If compliance paths gradually clear and financial and reserve information becomes more verifiable, this round of valuation surge may settle as part of the "new normal"; conversely, it may also not be ruled out that it will be retrospectively regarded as a one-time valuation peak during a period of abundant liquidity and undefined regulation.
Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
