In early 2026, the cryptocurrency market is experiencing a "tale of two extremes." On one side, the overall market is fluctuating repeatedly, while on the other, the RWA (Real World Asset) sector is strengthening against the trend, showing a resilient rebound and gradually reaching a critical point of qualitative change in the industry. This is not a short-term impulse growth driven by favorable stimuli, but rather the result of gradually clarified policy boundaries since 2024, continuous institutional investment, and the maturation of underlying infrastructure. It also marks the transition of the RWA sector from the proof-of-concept stage to actual large-scale implementation.
As of mid-January 2026, according to statistics from rwa.xyz, the total scale of RWA has risen to $22.9 billion, a significant increase from $19.22 billion in mid-November 2025. In terms of holder structure, the industry's growth shows stable rather than explosive characteristics, with the number of holders increasing from about 600,000 in mid-December 2025 to 650,000 by the end of January 2026, an increase of 8%-9% in just over a month. It is noteworthy that the number of monthly active addresses has declined from a peak of nearly 100,000 about a year ago, but the total value continues to rise. This performance indicates that RWA is increasingly viewed as a strategic asset on balance sheets rather than tokens used for high-frequency trading.
The asset distribution and on-chain landscape further highlight the institutional dominance. In terms of on-chain value locked, Ethereum holds an absolute dominant position, with RWA value at approximately $13.6 billion, accounting for about 60% of the global on-chain RWA total; BNB Chain follows closely with $2.3 billion, while Solana and Liquid Network stand at $1.1 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, with Stellar entering the main camp at $1 billion. Clearly, RWA assets prefer payment chains that execute predictably, have well-developed regulatory tools, and are supported by institutional custody, with value ultimately concentrating in scenarios with the lowest settlement risk.
In terms of asset categories, U.S. Treasury bonds remain the core pillar, reaching $9.8 billion, accounting for nearly 45%-50% of the total market volume, becoming the main entry point for institutional on-chain investments; commodities rank second at $4.1 billion, with gold-backed tokens (such as Tether's XAUT coin) being the core target; private credit amounts to $2.4 billion, though small in base, is growing rapidly, accounting for about 20%-30%; institutional alternative investment funds, corporate bonds, and public stocks are approximately $2.3 billion, $1.6 billion, and $900 million, respectively, forming the main landscape of the current RWA market. This trend was also confirmed at the 2026 Davos World Economic Forum (WEF), where tokenization became the core theme of the forum's cryptocurrency discussions. The WEF discussions defined 2026 as a "turning point" for digital assets, clearly stating that blockchain has moved beyond the pilot stage into actual production environments, with the focus shifting from early ideological debates to infrastructure construction, scalability, and enterprise-level deployment.
When RWA Becomes Part of Financial Engineering
If we look beyond the surface growth and institutional entry of RWA and delve into the asset structure, a clear and realistic trend emerges: the current growth of RWA primarily comes from highly financialized assets. Here, "real" refers more to the compliant on-chain presence of financial assets rather than direct empowerment of real-world production activities.
U.S. Treasury bonds, money market instruments, repurchase agreements, and commodity funds constitute the main body of on-chain RWA. These assets are not unfamiliar; they have long existed in the traditional financial system, with mature risk pricing, highly predictable cash flows, and clear regulatory pathways. The role of blockchain here is not to reinvent assets but to provide these assets with an all-weather, composable, and automated operating environment. These assets are essentially "low-risk yield instruments" on-chain, serving three core scenarios: underlying asset allocation for stablecoin systems, efficient management of institutional funds, and interest rate anchoring in the DeFi ecosystem. This layout is essentially an efficiency upgrade within the financial system, a reconstruction and circulation of traditional financial assets on-chain, rather than an extension and expansion into real economic scenarios.
In the current total scale of approximately $22.9 billion in RWA, U.S. Treasury bonds lead with about $9.8 billion, occupying the largest single category; commodities are around $4.1 billion, with gold-backed tokens (like Tether's XAUT) being the largest single asset in the entire RWA market; private credit is about $2.4 billion, and institutional alternative investment funds are around $2.3 billion. Corporate bonds, public stocks, and non-U.S. government debt are concentrated in the $800 million to $1.5 billion range. The reason Treasury bonds, money market instruments, and repurchase agreements dominate is that they are easiest for institutions to incorporate into existing risk management frameworks. They have clear cash flows, extremely low default probabilities, mature valuation systems, and existing infrastructure for compliance and custody. The role of blockchain here is not to reshape the assets themselves but to reduce settlement friction and enhance distribution efficiency.
This characteristic aligns closely with the core needs of institutions: corporate finance departments pursue yield and operational efficiency, tokenized Treasury bonds provide a return rate of 4%-6% and support 24/7 access, significantly advantageous compared to the traditional T+2 settlement cycle; private credit instruments typically offer returns significantly higher than traditional fixed-income assets, making them highly attractive for institutions managing large amounts of idle capital; asset management companies use tokenization to lower distribution costs and expand their investor base; banks focus on building infrastructure under compliance. This demand-driven approach further reinforces the current financialization attributes of RWA.
How RWA Has Come This Far
Looking back at the development path of RWA, we can clearly see the phased changes in asset structure, with the core logic behind it being the replacement of participant structures. The entry of different types of capital directly determines the allocation direction of RWA.
From 2020 to 2022, RWA was more focused on private credit, trade financing, and small and medium-sized enterprise loans. MakerDAO introduced on-chain stablecoin funds into real enterprises through RWA Vault; Centrifuge tokenized accounts receivable; Goldfinch attempted to build an on-chain credit network without crypto collateral. That was a phase characterized by high yields, high risks, and a strong "real-world" narrative, with the core goal of providing financing channels for small and medium-sized entities in the real economy, achieving a connection between on-chain capital and offline production.
The turning point occurred in 2023. As the systemic decline of DeFi-native yields continued while the scale of stablecoins expanded, there was an urgent need for a scalable and sustainable real yield support on-chain, leading to a shift in market demand. Treasury bonds, as low-risk, stable-yield financial assets, quickly filled this gap: with an annualized return of 4%-6%, 24/7 accessibility, and T+0 settlement, they became the ideal entry point for institutions into the on-chain world, and the asset structure gradually tilted from productive assets to financial assets, with institutional capital's attention gradually increasing.
As institutions gradually became the dominant force, the asset composition of RWA on-chain also changed accordingly: repurchase agreements have gradually taken a dominant position among the currently mapped assets, while the relative proportion of private credit has continued to decline. This structural adjustment essentially reflects the change in participant structure: when the dominant capital comes from the DeFi ecosystem, RWA tends to favor private credit models; when institutional capital becomes the main force, asset allocation naturally concentrates on repos.
The Success of Repo Also Reveals Its Boundaries
The value of repos to the RWA industry is undeniable; their low risk, high standardization, and strong liquidity make them easily recognized by regulators, becoming the core vehicle for building on-chain financial infrastructure. They perfectly match the current institutional needs, serving as a secure underpinning for stablecoins and acting as a benchmark for on-chain interest rate anchoring, facilitating a smooth integration of RWA with the traditional financial system. It can be said that repos are the "financial foundation" for the scaled development of the RWA industry, laying a compliant and stable development foundation for the industry.
However, the advantages of repos are also their boundaries. Repos do not create new economic activities nor improve the accessibility of financing in the real world. They operate more within the existing financial system, using blockchain technology to reduce settlement costs and enhance operational efficiency, rather than addressing "financing issues in the real economy." Essentially, this is a self-circulation of the financial system.
This is not a denial of repos but a definition of their role. Repos are the financial foundation of RWA but are unlikely to become the ultimate form. What truly needs RWA are not already highly liquid financial assets but those that lack liquidity, have low financing efficiency, yet possess real output capabilities.
Infrastructure, energy projects, computing resources, accounts receivable, and private credit all have clear cash flows but are often constrained by the high thresholds and inefficiencies of the traditional financial system. What they need is not higher interest rates but more suitable financing structures. The core pain point currently faced by traditional financial institutions is insufficient asset liquidity, which is precisely why the tokenization of such assets is needed: physical assets represented by solar power plants, real estate, etc., have high value but rigid trading models, and the "all-or-nothing" traditional trading model limits asset utilization efficiency. Tokenization can achieve ownership segmentation, significantly enhancing the liquidity of such assets and breaking through the bottlenecks of traditional finance.
Ultimately, yield is not the goal but a natural result of the asset being utilized. The yield from repos comes from the interest rate environment, while the yield from productive assets comes from real demand. When the assets themselves are not effectively utilized, no matter how sophisticated the yield design, sustainability is difficult to achieve.
For this reason, the true value of RWA is not to make already liquid assets flow again but to allow previously illiquid assets to truly enter the global financial system for the first time.
Compliance is Becoming Part of the Asset's Value
As institutional participation deepens, the narrative around RWA is undergoing a critical shift: compliance is no longer just a constraint; it is becoming part of the value itself.
Since 2025, a clearer regulatory framework has become an important catalyst for accelerating the development of RWA. In Europe, the MiCA regulation, which came into effect at the end of 2024, has continued to enter the implementation phase, providing clear legal boundaries for tokenized financial activities; in Asia, Hong Kong has implemented several regulatory actions in 2025, such as the "Stablecoin Regulation," which took effect on August 1 and established a licensing system for fiat-backed stablecoins. The government released a new digital asset policy statement in June, clearly supporting the development of digital assets, including RWA tokenization, and promoting compliance innovation in digital assets through regulatory sandboxes and pilot programs. Overall, these institutional advancements reflect a trend of major global markets moving from observation to scalable implementation.
At the 2026 Davos Forum, tokenization was repeatedly mentioned as a "turning point" for digital assets. The focus of discussions is no longer "whether to be included in the financial system" but "how to be integrated." Institutions such as BlackRock, BNY Mellon, and the European Clearing Bank have already begun substantial deployments in tokenized funds, private debt, and structured products. In this context, there cannot be only a roadmap without assets; there cannot be only a narrative without law; there cannot be only consensus without structure; there cannot be only emotion without rules. The future value of tokens will not only come from market consensus but also from compliance certainty.
At the same time, when the discussion returns to the essence, the core issue of RWA is not actually about "going on-chain." Tokenization is a technical issue, while the financing structure is the fundamental problem. How assets are priced, how risks are allocated, how cash flows serve investors, and how defaults and governance are executed—these structural designs are far more important than "whether there is a token." As the industry consensus states: "RWA is not about putting assets on-chain. It’s about rethinking how capital reaches production."
Towards 2026: The Next Phase of RWA
Looking ahead, industry consensus is gradually converging. On the asset side, there will be a shift from a focus on financial assets to a deepening of productive assets, with computing power assets, infrastructure revenue rights, and commodities becoming new growth engines; on the product side, there will be an upgrade from single tokenized products to structured financing models that meet the risk and return needs of different entities; on the narrative side, the focus will shift from a purely yield narrative to risk transparency and governance optimization, strengthening the trust foundation between institutions and small to medium investors; on the implementation side, there will be a move from pilot projects to large-scale applications. With lower investment thresholds and improved compliance tools, it is expected that the number of RWA holders will achieve further breakthroughs in 2026.
Despite the rapid development momentum, the RWA industry still faces multiple challenges: the authenticity of assets and the continuous auditing mechanism have yet to be perfected; the quantification and control of operational risks lack unified standards, restricting large-scale implementation; insufficient liquidity in the secondary market affects asset pricing and exit efficiency; legal structures and cross-border compliance differ, posing obstacles to cross-regional deployment. Additionally, on the technical side, cross-chain transaction costs reach as high as $1.3 billion annually, with price discrepancies of 1%-3% for the same asset across different chains, and the conflict between privacy needs and regulatory transparency remains unresolved, all of which are core obstacles to the industry's advancement.
However, the direction is clear. As predicted by the Boston Consulting Group (BCG), by 2033, the RWA market size is expected to reach $18.9 trillion, with significant certainty in industry growth. RWA has become a major perspective for the global financial community's participation in the cryptocurrency field, no longer a disruptive force but a lasting infrastructure reshaping capital markets. In 2026 and beyond, the development of RWA will no longer be defined by yield levels but will depend on the depth of integration with real production. Only by rooting in the real economy and activating the liquidity of productive assets can the core value of RWA in reconstructing the connection between finance and production be truly unleashed.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
