For a long time, the relationship between central banks and Bitcoin has been filled with skepticism and hesitation. Although many monetary authorities have considered issuing central bank digital currencies, few have seriously contemplated holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset. However, the Czech National Bank has launched a pilot project to test the direct custody of Bitcoin, a move that could fundamentally change this situation — it may reshape our understanding of sovereign wealth management in the digital age.

To understand the significance of this development, CoinRank interviewed Trezor analyst Lucien, who has been tracking the Bitcoin market and the dynamics of self-custody for a long time. Based in Prague, Lucien has an in-depth understanding of the Czech Bitcoin ecosystem, and he offers unique insights into why the Czech National Bank's (CNB) initiative is important and its implications for future monetary policy and financial sovereignty.

Sandbox Approach

"This is not what many headlines suggest," Lucien clarified at the beginning of the conversation. "The Czech National Bank is not immediately incorporating Bitcoin into its official reserves. They have created a so-called operational sandbox — a test portfolio worth $1 million that includes Bitcoin, a dollar stablecoin, and a tokenized bank deposit."

He explained that this controlled environment has specific purposes: to build internal capabilities before making a larger commitment. "The sandbox environment allows the central bank to gain practical experience in various aspects, from custody and key management to anti-money laundering compliance, accounting, and on-chain settlement and auditing," Lucien elaborated. "This is a learn-by-doing approach, which is fundamentally different from the theoretical discussions that have dominated the central banking community for years."

When asked about the timing of this initiative, Lucien pointed out an interesting contradiction. "Just ten months before the Italian National Bank launched this pilot program, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde had firmly stated that no central bank in the ECB Governing Council would venture into Bitcoin. Yet now, we see a member state doing just that." He paused and added, "This disconnect reveals significant differences in how various monetary authorities approach innovation and risk management — some ideologically oppose it, while others are willing to experiment."

Lucien noted that this initiative aligns closely with the overall strategy of Brazilian Central Bank President Roberto Campos Neto. "Neto has openly discussed the potential of Bitcoin for long-term investment and has guided the bank towards reserve diversification, including significant purchases of gold. This test portfolio is essentially his own proposal from January 2025, reflecting a well-considered philosophy rather than a passive response to market pressures or public sentiment."

Bitcoin as an Unsecured Asset

In our discussion, Bitcoin was frequently referred to as "digital gold." When asked about this comparison, Lucien responded, "I think this characterization is fundamentally accurate, but there are some important nuances. The key is to understand Bitcoin as an unsecured asset, similar to gold, whose sovereign value derives from direct ownership rather than a claim against another institution."

He contrasted this with traditional foreign exchange reserves: "The operational principle of foreign exchange reserves is entirely different. They are ultimately a claim against another government system, which inevitably introduces political risk. Bitcoin and gold do not carry this risk because institutions can hold them directly."

When asked whether Bitcoin truly surpasses gold, Lucien became more animated. "Bitcoin may outperform gold in practical operations. Gold requires vaults, insurance, armed transport, and assay verification — all of which incur significant costs and complex logistics. Bitcoin requires proper key management, but once institutions master this capability, the security and transfer efficiency of the asset are greatly enhanced. Settlements take hours instead of weeks, and the cost structure is entirely different."

He also emphasized another key advantage: "The inherent transparency that Bitcoin offers is something gold cannot match. For example, El Salvador shares its Bitcoin holdings on-chain in real-time, allowing anyone to independently verify. In contrast, the public can only trust the data published by central banks regarding gold reserves. But with Bitcoin, this transparency is built into the protocol itself."

Key Management Challenges

When discussing the operational challenges faced by central banks, Lucien did not hesitate to say, "If there is one obstacle that stands out in operations, it is key management. This is the biggest challenge because it is very complex and has no safety net — Bitcoin transactions do not have a 'cancel' button. Any mistake in key management could mean permanent, irreversible loss."

He continued, "The good news is that financial institutions have, in principle, understood multi-signature authorization. For decades, banks have used dual approval systems, requiring multiple signatures for larger transactions. Bitcoin multi-signature is essentially an encrypted version of this concept."

But Lucien emphasized that the key difference lies in: "The challenge is in the execution mechanism: it is a matter of mathematical principles, not internal policies. You cannot override the rules or make exceptions, which means governance and signing procedures must be flawless from the outset."

He analyzed the specific issues that keep central bank officials awake at night: "Who holds which keys? What is the signing threshold? What happens if someone leaves the institution or an emergency occurs? How do you securely rotate keys? How do you implement a backup system without introducing new vulnerabilities? Each question involves trade-offs that must be carefully weighed."

"These issues are solvable," Lucien assured, "but they require the establishment of entirely new operational capabilities. This is precisely why the CNB adopted a sandbox approach — it allows them to address these challenges with limited risk before scaling up."

The Unique Position of the Czech Republic

As the conversation shifted to the Czech Republic, Lucien's enthusiasm for his homeland's Bitcoin ecosystem was evident. "The existing Bitcoin infrastructure in the Czech Republic is often overlooked," he said. "Unlike many countries that need central banks to guide public acceptance of Bitcoin, the Czech public does not require encouragement. They have been enthusiastically using Bitcoin for over a decade."

He listed a series of impressive contributions: "The Czech Republic has the world's first mining pool. The first hardware wallet, Trezor, was also born here, and we have contributed to many Bitcoin standards still in use today. Prague is often referred to as the Bitcoin capital of the world, with over 1,000 places nationwide where Bitcoin transactions can be conducted — one of the most concentrated areas for Bitcoin trading in Europe."

"This is not just a theoretical application," Lucien emphasized, "it has been integrated into everyday business activities. The world's first Bitcoin conference was held in Prague in 2011, and today, the city hosts BTC Prague, the largest pure Bitcoin conference in Europe."

When asked about the regulatory environment, he highlighted a key advantage: "Czech law has supported the adoption of Bitcoin in a practical way. Holding Bitcoin for three years or more is tax-free. Daily Bitcoin payments are also tax-exempt. These policies indicate that the government understands Bitcoin's potential and has created an environment that encourages long-term holding while facilitating everyday use — which is rare in the European regulatory framework."

Lucien offered an interesting perspective on the relationship between public and institutional adoption: "The public's level of understanding has far outpaced that of many EU countries. The pilot project of the Italian National Bank is not aimed at encouraging public adoption but rather to help the central bank catch up and enhance its capabilities in potential reserve management. This subverts the usual narrative that monetary authorities lead while the public follows."

Comparative Regulatory Approaches

When discussing how other jurisdictions might emulate the Czech model, Lucien made an important distinction. "It is crucial to understand that there are two different types of initiatives that are often conflated," he explained. "Singapore, Switzerland, the UAE, and an increasing number of U.S. states have been building comprehensive regulatory frameworks for the retail cryptocurrency market — including licensing for exchanges, custodial service providers, and stablecoin issuers, as well as tokenization of traditional securities."

He continued, "The CNB's pilot project represents a fundamentally different situation. It is an internal operational experiment by the central bank itself. It is not a public-facing regulatory framework but rather a question of asset holdings on the monetary authority's own balance sheet. These are independent institutional decisions that are not necessarily related to one another."

He emphasized the uniqueness of the Czech approach: "The Czech Republic is simultaneously pursuing both methods. They have established reasonable retail rules — daily Bitcoin payments are tax-exempt, and there is a three-year capital gains tax exemption — and now the central bank is actively testing the feasibility of Bitcoin as a reserve asset. Most jurisdictions only adopt one of these approaches rather than balancing both."

When asked about the Czech regulatory philosophy, Lucien was candid: "It emphasizes learning in practice rather than endless theoretical debates. While other regions are still drafting discussion papers and policy proposals, the Czech National Bank has already taken direct steps to enhance operational capabilities. This is a pragmatic approach that prioritizes practical experience over bureaucratic discussions."

Implications for the Future of Currency

As the conversation drew to a close, I asked Lucien for his outlook on the future. "Predicting the exact trajectory of the global monetary landscape over the next ten to fifteen years is speculative," he admitted, "but certain fundamentals remain clear. The supply schedule and monetary policy of Bitcoin are fixed and transparent — you know exactly what you will get. The certainty of fiat currencies is much lower because their supply can change based on political decisions."

He believes early adopters have a significant advantage: "Central banks that understand Bitcoin as a neutral sovereign asset — especially smaller, more agile central banks — may gain considerable advantages. They can act more quickly than large institutions constrained by political consensus and bureaucratic inertia, which could give them an edge in the next monetary crisis."

Lucien emphasized, "What Bitcoin fundamentally offers is choice. Regardless of jurisdiction or institutional size, it applies equally to everyone and provides the same guarantees. Whether central banks choose to use this tool in the coming years and how effectively they implement it will likely determine which monetary authorities can operate successfully and which will struggle to survive."

He cautiously clarified, "This is not about replacing fiat currencies with Bitcoin; rather, it is about providing an additional option for reserve diversification."

In his concluding remarks, Lucien again referenced the Swiss National Bank's pilot project: "Institutions that are now building Bitcoin custody capabilities will have an advantage over those that ignore this area. Although the Swiss National Bank's pilot project is small, with only $1 million, the operational experience they are accumulating may become invaluable as the monetary landscape continues to evolve. In a world where sovereign financial instruments are becoming increasingly scarce, knowing how to custody unsecured assets without counterparty risk represents a significant strategic advantage — and this advantage will accumulate over time."

"Currently, the Czech National Bank's experiment is still just an experiment," he concluded. "However, its very existence challenges long-held perceptions of what central banks can and should do. Whether other monetary authorities will follow suit remains to be seen, but the door is now open. In the realm of monetary policy, as in many other areas, the gap between theory and practice is often more important than the theory itself. The Czech National Bank has chosen practice, thereby providing a reference roadmap for other central banks exploring this path."

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。