David Schwartz, Ripple’s chief technology officer, has emphasized a crucial security and trust distinction between assets native to a blockchain and assets bridged across different blockchains.
In a recent social media post, he has made it clear that native assets are fully secured by their own network, meaning that no external system can "steal" XRP because there’s no copy elsewhere that can be compromised.
"You can't steal XRP from XRPL because there is no place other than XRPL that XRP can be," Schwartz explained.
HOT Stories Breaking: US Spot XRP ETF Officially Gets Listing NoticeRipple CTO: You Can’t Steal XRP from XRPL Breaking: Hyperliquid Withdrawals PausedXRP Liquidation Imbalance Hits 5,999% as Price Eyes Rebound
You Might Also Like
Mon, 11/10/2025 - 20:05 CNBC: Ripple Is 'Conquering' Crypto ByAlex Dovbnya
If a problem arises with XRP itself (for instance, a bug or issue), the governance of the XRP Ledger can fix it.
He cites Bitcoin in 2013 as an example of a network fixing issues with its own native asset.
External risks
However, when one moves an asset like ETH onto XRPL via a bridge, that ETH still exists natively on Ethereum.
If the bridge is exploited or ETH is stolen on Ethereum, Ethereum’s governance won’t intervene since nothing is broken because the asset still exists on Ethereum. In such a case, recovery isn’t guaranteed.
Even if governance is decentralized, there’s always a point where assets could be potentially stolen outside the native network.
Hence, cross-chain interactions introduce a fundamentally different level of risk (even if governance is well-structured).
免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。