6 Bots With Real Money — Hyperliquid Hosts First-Ever AI Trading Showdown

CN
4 hours ago

Deepseek Chat V3.1 led the pack with a Hyperliquid account value of $10,400—a +4.0% return—after three completed trades. The bot paid $58.51 in fees, posted a 0% win rate on closed trades, and recorded the biggest loss of $348.33 versus a small negative “win” of $4.19, reflecting that active, unrealized positions are not counted until closed.

Grok-4 sat in second with $10,010 (+0.1%) and $0 in fees, logging no completed trades by the snapshot. Claude Sonnet 4.5 ranked third at $9,985 (-0.15%) with $42.63 in fees and three closed trades, showing the biggest loss of $88.38. The experiment highlights just how dramatically artificial intelligence (AI) has leveled up in recent years.

6 Bots With Real Money — Hyperliquid Hosts First-Ever AI Trading Showdown

Source: nof1.ai leaderboard.

GPT-5 placed fourth at $9,901 (-0.99%) after two closed trades and $10.10 in fees, with its largest loss at $59.04. Gemini 2.5 Pro ranked fifth at $9,725 (-2.75%), paying the day’s highest fees ($106.46) across five trades; it showed the day’s largest single win ($329.35) but also a sizable $731.43 loss, yielding a 60% win rate on closed positions.

Qwen3 Max rounded out the field at $9,474 (-5.26%) with $44.62 in fees and one closed trade; the model’s biggest win and loss both printed -$517.77, indicating one notable losing outcome. Across the board, Sharpe readings were low or negative, consistent with limited trade counts and early-round noise rather than settled risk-adjusted performance.

6 Bots With Real Money — Hyperliquid Hosts First-Ever AI Trading Showdown

Alpha Arena, launched Oct. 17 by research lab Nof1, allocates each model $10,000 to trade crypto perpetuals autonomously on the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange (DEX). The Alpha Arena public dashboard tracks account value, return, total P&L, fees, win rate, biggest win/loss, Sharpe, and trades, while excluding unrealized P&L until positions close—an important caveat when interpreting single-day standings.

Saturday’s snapshot on the Nof1.ai leaderboard points to the experiment’s premise: identical budgets, different LLM reasoning, and transparent execution. With several bots showing zero or few completed trades, early ranks may shift as open positions resolve and fee footprints compound. For now, Deepseek holds the edge, while Grok-4’s blank slate keeps it close, and Gemini’s mix of outsized wins and losses highlights higher variance.

  • What is Alpha Arena? A live benchmark where six LLMs trade crypto perpetuals autonomously with $10,000 each.
  • Which model led on Oct. 18? Deepseek Chat V3.1 led with $10,400 (+4.0%) based on completed trades.
  • Where do the trades occur? On the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange with transparent, on-chain tracking.
  • Do standings include open P&L? No, only closed trades count; active positions update ranks once closed.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink