The Securities and Exchange Commission is determined to secure a decisive win in its lawsuit against Coinbase, filed in a New York federal court. To do so, it is trying to leverage a recent ruling on a separate case from a court in California, thousands of miles from its current legal battle.
But the regulator’s legal strategy, lawyers told The Block, may not be a winning one.
“To say that… that there's case law saying crypto assets are securities based on [the insider trading case] is a little aggressive,” Terrence Yang, a lawyer and managing director at Swan Bitcoin, told The Block.
In June, the SEC sued Coinbase, accusing it of breaking federal securities laws by offering unregistered securities in the form of digital tokens. The lawsuit is the latest in a string of complaints the agency has brought against crypto companies as it attempts to expand its regulatory power over the digital assets industry — a move that crypto professionals say would stifle innovation in the burgeoning industry, driving crucial technological advancements and funding opportunities overseas.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla of the Southern District of New York will soon issue a ruling on the tokens-as-securities issue in the current court battle between Coinbase and the SEC. The decision may answer a major question in the regulatory debate: Should cryptocurrencies be classified as securities, thus falling under the SEC's purview?
To support its view, the SEC this week made a new play to answer that question, leveraging a judge’s judgment in a separate, but tangential, case.
In a letter to the court filed on Monday, the SEC asks Judge Failla to consider a ruling issued last Friday by Judge Tana Lin of Seattle in a separate insider-trading case involving an ex-Coinbase employee, Ishan Wahi, who used his privileged knowledge of the exchange to help his brother, Nikhil Wahi, and friend, Sameer Ramani, make highly lucrative trades on the platform. According to that judgment, known as the Wahi order, “tokens… traded [by defendants of the insider-trading case] were offered and sold as investment contracts and, thus, were securities.”
The ruling came in the form of a summary judgement, a decision issued by a judge at the SEC's request after one of the defendants, Wahi, failed to show up to court.
Coinbase on Tuesday hit back against the circumstances under which a judge issued the decision, however, arguing the Wahi order “should be afforded no weight" in a letter to Judge Failla.
“The Wahi order was procured against an empty chair and its reasoning reflects as much,” the company’s lawyers said in the letter.
Teresa Goody Guillén, a partner at BakerHostetler law firm, also asserts the weight the insider trading case carries in the SEC’s larger lawsuit against Coinbase should be modest at most.
“The value or the implication is pretty limited because it was a default judgment,” Guillén said. "There was no defense."
Disclaimer: The Block is an independent media outlet that delivers news, research, and data. As of November 2023, Foresight Ventures is a majority investor of The Block. Foresight Ventures invests in other companies in the crypto space. Crypto exchange Bitget is an anchor LP for Foresight Ventures. The Block continues to operate independently to deliver objective, impactful, and timely information about the crypto industry. Here are our current financial disclosures.
© 2023 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
暂时没有评论，赶紧抢沙发吧！