The approach of the Space project is harmful to the industry's reputation. Holding a PPT to raise $13 million, it has already overdrawn market trust, let alone as a prediction market, there is hardly any actual trading volume or user data support @ intodotspace one ️⃣ The publicly announced fundraising limit for the project during the public offering phase was $2.5 million. However, after the fundraising ended and the fund size had approached $20 million, the limit was later changed to a soft top and the vast majority of the excess funds were considered successful. The actual fundraising size was approximately $14 million two ️⃣ The project team subsequently announced to the public that they had refunded some of the funds, with a refund amount of approximately 6 million US dollars. However, many participants around me have provided feedback that users who invested 130000 US dollars or 50000 US dollars have not received any refunds, and ordinary users have hardly received any payments. At the same time, it can be seen on the chain that some of the refunded funds have been transferred to a large number of new wallets instead of being directly returned to the original investment address In this case, the project party should at least give the market a clear explanation, rather than choosing to hide questioning comments. If there is no positive response to the issues of changing statements afterwards and selective refunds, the ultimate damage will only be to the credit of the entire industry