@Humidifi's token 'wet' will launch an ICO on the Jupiter DTF platform on December 3rd, and specific ICO information has not been disclosed yet. According to Defillama data, the trading volume of Humidifi in the past 24 hours reached $636 million, surpassing Raydium ($511 million), Orca, and Meteora to become the largest DEX on the Solana network. The two easiest things to remember when seeing humidifi are DeFi 2.0 and dark pools In the bio promoted by @ humidifi, there is only DeFi 2.0, and there is no unnecessary nonsense from others. Humidifi is a private AMM (prop AMM) decentralized DEX of the Solana ecosystem, which achieves ultra tight price differentials and MEV protection through a dark pool mechanism. Has become the dominant player in Solana DEX trading volume, with a monthly trading volume of $34 billion, accounting for 35% of the market share, accumulating $112 billion, and reaching a daily average of $2 billion. It undertakes 47% of Jupiter aggregator trading traffic, and SOL-USDC holds a market share of 25-40%. Comparison with @ Raydium @ MeteoraAG @ orca_so: FDV is priced at 330 million yuan compared to Met and 600 million yuan compared to Ray. It is estimated that Wet will be publicly released on Jupiter DTF on December 3rd, with a price of around 500 million yuan. The token model has not been announced yet. It is estimated that there will be whitelist, priority for Jup stakers, and public first come, first served pre-sales in Jupiter DTF. We all know about the dark web and traditional AMM, so where is Humidifi's dark pool and defi2.0 innovation? ➤ Dark pool trading: Transactions are routed through aggregators (such as Jupiter) rather than public order books, and large orders can reduce slippage and MEV attacks. ➤ Liquidity Engine: Real time quoting, rebalancing, routing traffic, tightening price differentials, deepening liquidity. Support cross chain bridging (such as Wormhole) and integrate re collateralization, allowing LP circulation for lending and releasing idle capital. The pain points of traditional passive LP, such as high slippage, idle funds, MEV attacks, etc. Humidifi's dark pool does not rely on publicly available liquidity pools provided by users, but instead uses internal market makers or protocol owned funds to provide private inventory. Transactions are completely routed through aggregators such as Jupiter, and users do not need to directly interact with the protocol front-end. This ensures' invisible execution '- orders are not visible on the public chain until final settlement. There are also risks, such as team anonymity, opaque dark pools, and potential regulatory risks. Pay attention and take a look recently.