In my logic, the core is' grasping the big and letting go of the small '. The grand idea is so simple that even I find it verbose. There are two big things to catch. One refers to the global currency release cycle, where major asset classes must rise and new types of assets with stories must rise. AI foam must continue to blow and crypto must continue to expand. If these don't rise, should we let the price of daily necessities increase? Whether or not there is a rate cut in December, stopping the balance sheet reduction is already a certainty. Next year, the monetary power of the Federal Reserve will continue to decline, and under Trump's manipulation, it will gradually be transferred to the Treasury Department. In addition, Japan announced today that it will start releasing water as a stimulus. Who can resist not releasing water from neighboring universities like Tokyo University and across the river from Europe? The second point is next year's midterm elections. In order to win the midterm elections, the stock market cannot collapse, the economy cannot collapse, and we have to start making money. There will definitely be news of money being sent in the coming months, regardless of the name. The term 'small' refers to various noises in the market. A certain ETH treasury has started selling coins, BTC is facing a threat from quantum computers, BlackRock ETF has a net outflow, and market makers need to liquidate These 'small' may be correct, but they cannot change the cycle script or shake the historical process of encryption. If we add a time period to your investment/speculation, not to mention far, one year? two years? So now BTC ETH should all be at a cabbage price, right. At this point, don't you think that's what's going on. What if BTC is set at 100000 and ETH is set at 3300? Just wait without any leverage. I can do this, do you think BitMine and Micro Strategy will panic. They will only try to get more chips from you and me.