The WSJ has now updated their reporting to align with this statement that the “bulletins” “may not accurately reflect” any messages on the ammunition. I don’t want to put myself down, but when a random dude like me on Twitter can get it right, maybe major newspapers should to? The first things I wrote on this news when it broke was: 1) Doesn’t align with the other facts we’ve seen. 2) Is suspiciously convenient. 3) Makes no sense with the type of crime perpetrated 4) Doesn’t match demographics of the area It’s not unreasonable to expect that level of thought and scrutiny from a major outlet!(Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth))