Humanity: Fairdrop - Embarking on the Airdrop 3.0 Era Introduction 1: @The wealth creation effect of Arbitrum airdrops brought about the first wave of enthusiasm for establishing hair raising studios, and since then, every Heavenly King level project airdrop has spawned a wave of enthusiasm for establishing hair raising studios. But sadly, in just two years, the track of the hair raising studio has shifted from the blue ocean to the red ocean. Introduction 2: @After KaitoAI took over as the AI version of the encrypted Marketing Agency, the airdrop weight of the project team began to tilt towards the waist KOLs, and the users of hair picking began to shift from traditional hand picking (on chain interaction) to mouth picking (monetization of influence). If the decentralized human proof network @ Humanityprot rewards Kaito Yapper with 2.2M native token H, Kaito will distribute a portion of the airdrop cake, further compressing the living space of the hair raising studio. The intense competition in the segmented track, the upgrade of the witch strategy of the project team, the promotion of the Fairdrop concept, and the rise of the mouth massage mode have gradually pushed the hair massage studio to a dead end with diminishing marginal returns. From the Airdrop 1.0 era represented by @ Arbitrum, to the Airdrop 2.0 era represented by @ Eclipse FND, and then to the Airdrop 3.0 era represented by @ Humanityprot, let me briefly talk about the transition of token distribution from Airdrop to Fairdrop. <Airdrop 1.0 Golden Age> The airdrop of Arbitrum marked the beginning of a nationwide hair raising campaign. The low threshold, relaxed witch prevention, and high single account returns marked the beginning of the golden age of hair raising. The huge wealth creation effect brought about by airdrops sparked the first wave of enthusiasm for the establishment of hair raising studios. That was an era that Feng Mi teacher @ KuiGas described as worth thousands of troops and horses, an era where ordinary people who worked harder and luckier changed their fate against the heavens. Driven by the low threshold airdrop mechanism, top tier projects such as @ Arbitrum have adopted relatively lenient anti witch strategies, creating conditions for the rise of hair raising studios. Due to the relatively loose witch judgment rules set by the project team, the studio's use of semi automated and automated interactive scripts can still easily bypass the audit standards, thus capturing a large amount of airdrop shares. But the cake in the airdrop market is so big that with the surge in the number of studios, the profit space of loyal chain users is rapidly squeezed. The advantage of technological endowment is obvious, and the high asymmetry of revenue between studios and loyal users has raised doubts about the fairness of airdrops. In order to cope with the worsening phenomenon of "witch infestation", the project team had to passively raise the airdrop threshold and strengthen the on chain behavior profile of user addresses to identify witches (such as continuity of interaction cycles, diversity of interaction asset targets, fund retention, etc.). Although the threshold for airdrops is constantly increasing, the anti witch logic at this stage is mainly based on on on chain data. The project party's utilization of web-based information (such as KYC/social accounts) is still in a blank stage and has not yet entered the deep water area of "on chain data+off chain behavior joint judgment". Airdrop 2.0 Platinum Era The anti witch strategy in the Airdrop 2.0 era has undergone a fundamental transformation, shifting from pure on chain behavior analysis to a deep water area of "on chain data+off chain behavior joint judgment". There are countless projects that use this joint judgment method to prevent witches, such as @ QuaiNetwork, @ lagrangedev, etc., which require users who meet the airdrop eligibility criteria to do KYC in order to receive the airdrop; For example, the once famous king level SVM chain @ Eclipse FND also adopts the method of "joint judgment of on chain data and off chain behavior" to strictly investigate witches. If suspicious on chain behavior is found, social media (X/Discord) bound to user addresses will be reviewed. This method of witch hunting brings two irreconcilable and thorny issues: 1) The privacy issues caused by it lead to the leakage of user identity information; 2) Forcing the bot to upgrade its technology, various deep pseudo technologies are constantly iterating and optimizing. As the saying goes, there are policies at the top and countermeasures at the bottom: studios can still improve their deepfake technology based on AI, as long as they disguise themselves well enough on social media, they can deceive project parties based on social media witch hunting. Airdrop 3.0 Purple Gold Era @The emergence of Humanityprot has solved the most difficult problem of the Airdrop 2.0 era, truly making witches nowhere to hide and opening the Purple Gold era of Airdrop 3.0. 1) Who is Humanity? @Humanityprot is a blockchain network that is resistant to Sybil attacks, based on zero knowledge proof (ZK) and biometric technology to verify real humans. Among them, zero knowledge proof technology solves the thorny privacy leakage problem in the 2.0 era, and biometric recognition technology based on palm print scanning solves the problem of difficulty in distinguishing the authenticity of deep pseudo technology in the 2.0 era. Real user's web3 identity=palmprint scan+zero knowledge proof. 2) What technology architecture is used to implement Humanity privacy protection and anti Sybil attacks? In terms of privacy protection: Humanity introduces zero knowledge proof nodes (zkProofer Nodes) to process identity verification based on zero knowledge proof technology, allowing users to prove specific attributes without leaking raw data. Nodes do not have access to user personal information during operation, and they will receive H token rewards through honest verification behavior; To resist Sybil attacks: Humanity uses non-invasive palm print recognition technology, allowing users to verify their identity without directly touching the sensor with their palm. The entire process is fast, seamless, and privacy friendly. 3) What sets it apart from @ worldcoin in the same race? @Worldcoin can be said to be @ Humanityprot's biggest competitor in the segmented track, but the competitive advantage under Humanity's differentiated positioning is also evident. Worldcoin's biometric recognition uses invasive iris scanning, which requires user cooperation and contact with the device, and the risk of privacy leakage is relatively high; @Humanityprot uses non-invasive palm print recognition technology, emphasizing privacy protection and user autonomy. In addition, in terms of verification methods, Worldcoin adopts a decentralized verification approach; Humanity achieves more decentralized verification by building a verification network consisting of zkProofers and Identity Validators. In terms of data, the first phase of testing for @ Humanityprot has ended, with over 8 million human IDs and an average daily on chain transaction volume of 140000. The user base covers 150+countries and regions. At present, the second phase Beta Testnet has been launched, and according to the main online token H TGE, it is very close. <Write at the end> The emergence of Humanity is a redefinition of Fairdrop; The popularization of Humanity is also the last straw that crushed the hair raising studio. In the face of the tide of AI and fraud, the power of individuals is simply too small; Only by adapting to changes can we stand at the top of the tide. Thanks: @AleaResearch provides detailed research report materials on @ Humanityprot. reference material: https://www.humanity.org/blog https://(alearesearch.io)/blueprint/humanity-protocol/