Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy
BTCBTC
💲66879.28
-
0.21%
ETHETH
💲2053.28
-
0.49%
SOLSOL
💲80.26
+
1.54%
WLDWLD
💲0.2685
+
0.6%
USDCUSDC
💲1.00
-
0%
XRPXRP
💲1.32
+
0.76%

ⓧ Jack Levin ⓧ X1
ⓧ Jack Levin ⓧ X1|3月 13, 2025 17:49
Watching SIMD 228 vote is incredible. The proposal is to reduce SOL inflation, which is a good idea as it reduces at least 4B in SOL issuance per, stops dilution the supply and reduces sell pressure. The problem is a lot of smaller validators will be forced to leave the network as their staking rewards likely going to be cut, making it too expensive to run their nodes. That’s the cohort that’s voting “No” as they don’t capture much of the transaction fees. Large validators make majority of their revenue from the tx fee capture, the delegated stake enables them to be chosen as “leaders” or block proposers / producers more often. Those are the guys voting “Yes”. If Yes/No ratio remains as it is now for the next few hours - the proposal won’t pass. If anyone ever says Solana is centralized - here is the clear indication that network protocol changes can’t be forced without consensus of all participating parties.
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

HotFlash

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads