There are still many doubts 1. Why doesn't Binance disclose its name? Even if there is a confidentiality agreement, is it still a violation of the interests of Binance and Binance users? 2. Why did similar situations occur twice in a short period of time? Has the previous opening decline been investigated? 3. Why would the "cooperative market maker" of the project party smash the market without a contractual agreement? Aren't market makers worried about being sanctioned by Binance? Not in line with common sense. Suggest Binance to create a space to bring in market makers and project parties to clarify the situation @heyibinance