The victim has approached me a few times regarding this matter. The first time, I felt there should be something amiss. Based on my understanding of exchanges, the probability of "embezzlement" is quite low, especially since the relationship between Pionex and GMGN is public, and reputation is quite important.

From reading the full text and the exchanged information, it seems that the original author, Willam, may indeed have encountered issues with multiple KYC registrations, which is a common problem many people face. During the early registration restrictions of exchanges, they often employed curve tactics, which planted a troublesome seed.

Even now, if the exchange claims that the account has encountered KYC issues, the actual holder will still be very passive. However, the author has already reported the matter to the local police and has received a report receipt, and the original KYC holder is actively cooperating and communicating, so Pionex should indeed pay more attention to this.

At the moment, I cannot determine if Willam is the victim or if the account has KYC issues, but I believe that since Willam has reported to the police, Pionex can cooperate with the police for further investigation. If there is indeed no response for two weeks, that is not acceptable.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。