On January 30, 2026, at 8:00 AM UTC+8, U.S. President Trump officially nominated former Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh to replace Jerome Powell, whose term will expire in May 2026, to lead the world's most critical central bank. This personnel signal quickly stirred ripples in both macro and crypto markets, not only due to his policy experience from 2006 to 2011 but also because he publicly emphasized in 2025 that "Bitcoin is the inspector of monetary policy," which is seen as a sharp critique of the existing fiat currency system. Meanwhile, the interest rate derivatives market continues to price in two rate cuts in 2026, juxtaposed with the ongoing inflow of funds into crypto assets, creating a contradictory yet real scene: expectations of monetary easing, reshaping of regulatory personnel, and the narrative of decentralized assets are intertwining in both the market and public discourse.
The Trajectory from Crisis Governor to New Chair Candidate
● Career Background: Public information shows that Warsh served as a Federal Reserve Governor from 2006 to 2011, spanning the period of the pre-crisis bubble's end and the early phase of post-crisis quantitative easing. He previously worked at major financial institutions on Wall Street and has long-standing connections in the Republican-dominated policy circles, creating a natural interface between financial markets and politics. This experience has made him familiar with market operation logic and deeply aware of Washington's political expectations regarding monetary power, laying the groundwork for his re-emergence under Trump.
● Long-term Concerns: After leaving office, Warsh has repeatedly emphasized his concerns about inflation risks, overheated asset prices, and the boundaries of central bank power in public articles and interviews. He warns of the distortions in asset valuations caused by prolonged low interest rates and balance sheet expansions, and questions whether central banks have taken on a "market guardian" role that exceeds their traditional responsibilities. Under this line of thinking, he is more focused on how to introduce external constraints on monetary policy rather than relying solely on internal technocrat consensus for self-correction.
● Information Boundaries: Currently, what can be cross-verified from multiple sources includes his tenure as a governor, departure time, and public statements, including concerns about inflation and asset bubbles. However, his specific "contact person" role during the 2008 crisis and internal negotiation details are clearly marked as unverified information in research briefs. Without original documents and authoritative records, packaging these stories as key "merit evaluations" can mislead readers and may be over-interpreted as implicit assessments of his crisis responsibilities or merits, necessitating deliberate noise reduction in the narrative.
How the Inspector of Bitcoin Narrative Moves the Discourse
● Monetary Perspective Reflection: Warsh's statement in a 2025 interview that "Bitcoin is the inspector of monetary policy" essentially acknowledges an asset that is priced spontaneously by the market, detached from sovereign credit, creating an external supervisory mechanism for central banks. This is not a simple "crypto-friendly" declaration but a critique of the inherent incentive structure within the fiat currency system: when central banks tend to smooth cycles through inflation and low interest rates, Bitcoin's price and holding behavior act like a mirror, reflecting the public's collective judgment on fiat currency devaluation and policy credibility.
● Position Temperature: Some institutions have summarized Warsh's stance as "more moderate than extreme hawks." This means that compared to traditional hawks who focus solely on inflation while ignoring asset prices and financial cycles, he is more sensitive to market shocks and asset valuation feedback, and does not entirely reject innovative tools within a regulatory framework. From the mainstream market perception, he is neither a complete "crypto ally" nor a traditional central bank official instinctively hostile to risk assets, but rather someone who seeks to rebalance the boundaries of central bank power and market discipline, leaving room for new assets, including Bitcoin.
● Community Interpretation: For this reason, the crypto community views his "inspector" statement as an institutional-level friendly signal, rather than a simple "shift in risk preference." In his context, Bitcoin is seen as an external auditing tool for monetary policy: when central banks expand their balance sheets or maintain negative real interest rates for an extended period, on-chain fund flows and price trends transparently record market distrust. For an industry that has been demonized, this expression of embedding Bitcoin into the macro governance narrative is more symbolically significant than any short-term bullish rhetoric.
Rate Cut Bets Unchanged: How Wall Street Interprets
● Interest Rate Pricing: Even after the nomination news on January 30, the interest rate market still prices in two rate cuts in 2026, indicating that traders have not immediately rewritten the macro script due to personnel changes. The mainstream assumption remains: regardless of who leads the Federal Reserve, the U.S. will ultimately need to rhythmically lower policy rates around 2026 to avoid excessive pressure on the real economy from persistently high real interest rates amid slowing growth and gradually declining inflation.
● Continuity and Shift: Under this baseline, if Warsh takes office, he is more likely to be seen as a "version update" within the same macro script: on one hand, he will likely inherit his predecessor's institutional arrangements regarding communication frameworks and goal setting to maintain the Federal Reserve's image as a "predictable central bank"; on the other hand, he is more sensitive to asset prices, financial stability, and the expansion of central bank power, which may lead to a stronger preference for discipline in the pace of balance sheet reduction and the use of asset purchase tools. This expectation of "unchanged direction, adjustable path" is gradually being incorporated into asset pricing.
● Causal Boundaries: It is important to emphasize that equating the appointment news with short-term price fluctuations is highly dangerous. Research briefs clearly indicate that there is insufficient data to support the specific market conditions of Bitcoin or other currencies on the nomination day, and it is prohibited to directly attribute the day's price movements to the nomination event. Macro trading inherently involves multiple variables: corporate earnings reports, macro data, liquidity environment, and even technical positioning all influence prices within the same time window. Simplifying the complex game to "because Warsh was nominated, Bitcoin went up/down" is both analytical laziness and misleading to readers.
BlackRock Increases $240 Million: Institutional Footnotes for Bitcoin and Ethereum
● Fund Scale: Coinciding with the personnel changes is BlackRock's increased investment in crypto assets. According to data from source A, it deposited approximately 2,288 BTC and 19,644 ETH into Coinbase, amounting to about $240 million at the time of valuation. This action occurred during a period of rising macro uncertainty, significant fluctuations in gold, and the reshaping of Federal Reserve personnel, providing a substantial sample of "how institutions view currency devaluation and hedging assets."
● Motivational Speculation: Traditional asset management giants expanding their crypto exposure before macro turning points is more of a rebalancing in asset allocation rather than an emotional bet. On one hand, the long-term issues of inflation and fiscal deficits have not been structurally resolved, and the purchasing power outlook for fiat assets remains uncertain; on the other hand, the liquidity and infrastructure of crypto assets (such as compliant custody and ETF products) have significantly matured, making them gradually suitable for entry into "institutional asset pools." Against this backdrop, increasing holdings of Bitcoin and Ethereum appears more like an insurance policy against future uncertainties in the monetary environment.
● Juxtaposition with the "Inspector" Narrative: As Warsh refers to Bitcoin as the "inspector of monetary policy," BlackRock simultaneously writes down a substantial position on-chain with $240 million in funds, making the overlap of this narrative and behavior intriguing. On one side is a potential new central bank chair acknowledging the supervisory function of decentralized assets; on the other side is the world's largest asset management company voting with real money for this function. For readers, this provides a coordinate for observation: institutions do not need to "fall in love" with Bitcoin; they only need to recognize its value as a hedging tool against inflation and policy errors on the margins of the fiat currency system, which is sufficient to support a long-term capital inflow pipeline.
Gold Drops 3% and Parallel Scripts of Regulatory Movements
● Risk Preference Switch: Research briefs indicate that after gold reached a new high of $5,600, it experienced a sharp 3% drop in a single day, breaking the illusion of "one-sided safe haven." Behind this scene is a subtle rotation of global funds in the tail end of a high-interest rate environment and the repricing of inflation expectations: the price elasticity of traditional safe-haven assets is beginning to increase, with some funds attempting to find a more cost-effective "risk hedging combination" among equities, tech growth, and crypto assets.
● Regulatory Progress: Unlike the monetary power struggle surrounding the Federal Reserve chair nomination in the U.S., other jurisdictions are accelerating regulatory moves. Hong Kong plans to submit four regulatory drafts related to crypto, while Latin American fintech giant Nubank has been authorized to conduct digital asset custody business in the U.S. The details of these events are not elaborated in the briefs, but their directional signals are clear: regardless of personnel changes at the U.S. Federal Reserve, major global financial centers are incorporating crypto assets into the compliant financial system through regulatory frameworks and licensed institutions.
● Parallel Narratives: From a macro perspective, the U.S. is undergoing an internal restructuring of "who will steer monetary power," while outside this stage, Hong Kong, Brazil, and U.S. regulatory agencies are building a multi-threaded story of "how to integrate crypto into financial infrastructure." The former concerns the future path of the dollar as the world reserve currency, while the latter determines whether crypto assets can transition from marginal speculative tools to mainstream asset classes. The two are not in a primary-secondary relationship but are mirror images of each other: as central bank discourse adjusts and regulatory boundaries are redrawn, the market's pricing logic for Bitcoin and Ethereum will also be updated accordingly.
The Next Act of the Crypto Market Under Reshaped Policy Power
In the puzzle of Trump nominating Warsh, the market still betting on two rate cuts in 2026, and BlackRock transferring approximately $240 million in BTC and ETH to Coinbase, we see a tension and resonance: on one hand, Washington is attempting to redefine the risk preferences and power boundaries of monetary policy through personnel adjustments; on the other hand, Wall Street responds with actual positions, indicating that the demand to hedge against currency devaluation and institutional uncertainties is more honest than verbal positions. The intertwining of rate cut path expectations, crypto fund flows, and significant fluctuations in gold makes this discussion about "the future of money" no longer confined to academic and political discourse but directly reflected on balance sheets.
Moving forward, the rhythm of Senate hearings and confirmation processes will become one of the key observation points, but research briefs have already clarified: there is currently insufficient information to extrapolate a specific timetable, nor can precise numbers be given through probabilities. What is truly worth tracking is how inflation targets, asset prices, balance sheet reduction tools, and central bank independence are discussed in the game between the candidate and lawmakers, and how these statements are re-priced by the interest rate curve and risk assets.
Under the narrative that "Bitcoin is the inspector of monetary policy," crypto assets are endowed with a potential new role: not just high-volatility speculative targets, but as an external constraint mechanism embedded in the global monetary system. When central banks expand their balance sheets and governments continue high deficits, on-chain prices, holding structures, and cross-border flows can serve as real-time feedback to test whether policies are over-drawing future credit. Regardless of whether Warsh ultimately takes the helm at the Federal Reserve, it is certain that this round of discussions surrounding the reshaping of monetary power has pushed Bitcoin onto a new stage—from a passive victim of policy to an entity viewed as an "auditor" by some decision-makers.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
