From January 19 to January 23 Eastern Time, the cryptocurrency market experienced a sharp shift amid significant inflows and outflows of spot ETF funds: on one hand, BTC and ETH spot ETFs recorded historic net outflows, with prices and sentiment declining in tandem; on the other hand, the SOL spot ETF saw slight net inflows, with alternative sectors like GameFi rising against the mainstream pressure. While mainstream assets faced a "brake" on funds, high-elasticity, small-cap targets welcomed tentative increases in allocation. This stark contrast reveals the re-pricing of funds, narrative rotation, and swings in risk appetite during this ETF cycle.
Bitcoin Plummets Below 89,000: The Impact of Historic Second Highest Fund Outflow
● Price Shock Scenario: During the window from January 19-23 Eastern Time, BTC was rapidly sold off from a high position, briefly dropping below $89,000, hovering in the $88,900–$89,000 range, with technical levels breached amplifying market panic. The "flash crash" in price, combined with a high-leverage environment, further exacerbated already tense sentiment, laying the groundwork for subsequent collective withdrawals from ETF funds.
● Second Highest Net Outflow in History: In sync with the price correction, BTC spot ETFs recorded a $1.33 billion net outflow during this period, marking the second highest on record. This level of capital flight starkly contrasts with the previous months' "only inflows" trend, indicating that the ETF channel is no longer just a one-way valve for incremental buying but is becoming one of the key conduits for price pressure.
● IBIT Turning Point: At the product level, BlackRock's IBIT has accumulated a total net inflow of $62.9 billion since its launch, making it the "capital-absorbing king" of BTC spot ETFs. However, this week, IBIT experienced a $537 million net outflow, marking the first significant retreat of this level against a large existing stock. This "bloodletting" trend has made some investors wary of potential short-term trend reversal signals.
● Resonance of Confidence and Volatility: The price breaking through key integer levels, combined with the second highest net outflow in ETF history, put pressure on BTC along both sentiment and liquidity fronts. Some institutional funds collectively "let go" through the ETF channel, weakening the support for the spot market and amplifying short-term volatility. In the absence of clear positive hedges, market confidence experienced a phase collapse, with more participants opting to wait and even reduce risk exposure.
ETH Faces $600 Million Selling Pressure: Wall Street Offers No "Safe Haven"
● Ethereum Also Bleeds: In sync with BTC, during the week of January 19-23 Eastern Time, ETH spot ETFs recorded a $611 million net outflow. Although this figure is lower than BTC's $1.33 billion, it is still significant, indicating that institutional funds are not only reducing positions in major assets but are also not providing Ethereum with independent "safe haven" treatment.
● Absence of Rotational Buying: Typically, when a single asset is under pressure, the market expects a "rotate from A to buy B" logic. However, this week's data shows that ETH did not fully benefit from safe-haven inflows from BTC, instead experiencing net redemptions alongside BTC, indicating that the so-called "rotational defense among mainstream assets" did not play out during this window, with funds leaning more towards overall deleveraging rather than intra-sector hedging.
● Overall Risk Appetite Cooling: From a behavioral perspective, institutions chose to reduce holdings in both BTC and ETH, reflecting a phase cooling of overall crypto risk exposure, rather than a structural negative for any single asset. As the most direct compliant channel, the fund flows of ETFs more reflect a risk management orientation at the portfolio level, meaning that without changing the long-term framework, risks are first "dialed down to a lower level."
● "Braking" Rather Than Qualitative Shift: Under the premise of prohibiting the fabrication of specific reasons, the current outflows from ETH and BTC appear more like a "brake" rather than a confirmed trend reversal. Currently, we can only observe from the results that the ETF channels for mainstream assets are being used to quickly reduce risks, but we cannot conclude whether this indicates a fundamental change in long-term bearishness or fundamental judgment.
SOL Attracts Capital Against the Trend: From Marginal Asset to New Favorite for Funds
● Slight Net Inflow: Unlike the large-scale net redemptions of BTC and ETH, during the same time frame, the SOL spot ETF recorded a $9.57 million net inflow, becoming one of the few mainstream public chain assets still attracting funds. Meanwhile, Fidelity's FSOL saw a net inflow of $5.2798 million that week, further solidifying its position as an important channel for institutional compliance.
● Sharp Contrast with Mainstream Outflows: While BTC and ETH saw nearly $1.94 billion withdrawn from the ETF side, SOL still recorded a positive inflow in the millions, highlighting a significant contrast: against the backdrop of overall risk appetite contraction, SOL is still viewed by some institutions as a "high-elasticity testing ground" worth small position increases, rather than simply being sold off alongside the mainstream.
● "Small Volume but Clear Direction" Picture: From the market perspective, while funds are withdrawing from mainstream assets like BTC and ETH, they have not completely exited but have chosen to reposition through the SOL ETF. Although $9.57 million is merely a fraction compared to the inflows and outflows at the Bitcoin level, it constitutes a clearly directional signal—some funds are actively shifting from large-cap blue chips to high-beta public chains, aiming to capitalize on the next narrative amplifier at lower levels.
● Shadows of Narrative Rotation: The allocation to SOL is likely related to the narrative rotation surrounding its ecosystem, performance, and application imagination, but in the absence of transparent account structures and investment decision details, we cannot fabricate specific investment logic. What can currently be confirmed is the behavior of funds: as mainstream assets face pressure, SOL has not been indiscriminately abandoned but is being tentatively increased by some institutions as a more elastic branch of crypto exposure.
Mainstream Retreat Moment: GameFi Sector's Counter-Trend Excitement
● Data on the Counter-Trend: Against the backdrop of mainstream assets under pressure, the GameFi sector saw an overall increase of 1.06% within a 24-hour window, with representative tokens SAND surging 8.57% and AXS rising 7.06%. In contrast to BTC briefly dropping below $89,000 and ETH facing hundreds of millions in ETF net redemptions, these gaming tokens exhibited a short-term "independent market," creating a striking contrast at the sector level.
● Narrative Tension of Contrast: As BTC and ETH, as crypto "blue chips," faced collective selling pressure, sectors like GameFi suddenly ignited, presenting a structural contradiction of "mainstream retreat, small caps celebration." In terms of price trends, these tokens showed decreased correlation with the broader market, reflecting more active pursuit of high-volatility targets amid mainstream declines, with narrative-driven colors significantly enhanced.
● Alternative Tracks and Speculative Activity: Alongside GameFi, narrative sectors like AI and RWA are also viewed by the market as part of the "alternative track" camp in this cycle. Although the brief did not provide specific growth data for these two sectors, they, along with GameFi, constitute high-elasticity outlets available to funds amid mainstream asset pressure. This sector rotation reflects the continued activity of short-term speculative funds, constantly seeking themes and sources of volatility.
● Emotional Game More Than Fundamental Confirmation: It is important to emphasize that this counter-trend rise reflects more short-term sentiment and trading games rather than long-term fundamentals being validated. Whether it's the +8.57% SAND or +7.06% AXS, there is currently a lack of long-term data support to prove a trend reversal. A more reasonable interpretation is that amid mainstream asset pressure and overall cautious funding, these sectors are being used to amplify remaining risk appetite rather than becoming a new round of value anchoring.
Node Voting and Wall Street Preferences: Macro Noise Amplifies Market Volatility
● Extremely Low Support Rate for BIP-110: In terms of on-chain governance, the BIP-110 proposal for Bitcoin currently has only 2.38% node support, or 583/24,481 nodes. Such a weak approval ratio reflects the high degree of divergence within the Bitcoin community regarding development direction and technical paths, rather than a simple technical dispute. This long-standing unresolved divergence provides a source of vague but persistent "noise" for market sentiment.
● Wall Street's Policy Preference: On a macro level, there are voices in the market suggesting that "Wall Street prefers candidates for the Federal Reserve chair who have a reformist mindset." This preference essentially reflects traditional finance's expectations for the future monetary and regulatory environment—hoping for someone closer to capital market logic to lead policy direction, thereby seeking new balance points in interest rates, liquidity, and regulatory scales.
● Emotional Transmission of Divergence and Game: When on-chain governance shows clear cracks and macro policy personnel are highly scrutinized by the market, these two seemingly unrelated forces together form the background noise of investor sentiment. On one hand, the low support rate for BIP-110 raises concerns among some about Bitcoin's lack of a unified perspective at the consensus level; on the other hand, Wall Street's preferences for policymakers complicate expectations, making investors more cautious when pricing the future.
● Noise Amplification Rather Than Single Causation: In the absence of direct causal evidence, these factors are better viewed as "amplifiers" of volatility rather than the sole reasons explaining ETF fund flows. In other words, the massive outflows of BTC and ETH this week, along with the counter-trend inflows into SOL and GameFi, cannot be simply attributed to a single proposal vote or a potential personnel arrangement, but these macro and community-level uncertainties indeed make the originally fragile sentiment more susceptible to directional amplification.
Mainstream Pressure and Narrative Excitement: What This Week's Capital Migration Means
The overall picture this week shows historic fund outflows from BTC and ETH ETF channels: Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $1.33 billion, while ETH spot ETFs had a net outflow of $611 million, with price corrections and sentiment cooling resonating with each other, putting pressure on mainstream assets on both liquidity and confidence fronts. Concurrently, SOL ETF recorded a net inflow of $9.57 million, FSOL net inflow of $5.2798 million, and the GameFi sector saw an overall increase of 1.06% within 24 hours, with SAND and AXS experiencing significant counter-trend performances, collectively sketching a picture of funds seeking high-elasticity targets amid stock game dynamics.
Based on the disclosed data, it is still far from confirming a complete reversal of a long-term trend, and even more challenging to declare that BTC and ETH's dominance has structurally ended. A more reasonable understanding is that the dominance of mainstream assets has been temporarily broken during this time window, with some funds hitting the brakes through ETF channels while using small-cap SOL, GameFi, and other tracks to release remaining risk appetite, forming a phase misalignment of "mainstream downgrading, marginal excitement."
Moving forward, three lines of inquiry are truly worth continuous tracking: first, whether the fund flows of BTC, ETH, SOL, and other spot ETFs continue to flow out or turn positive again; second, whether the rotation intensity and sustainability of narrative sectors like GameFi, AI, and RWA weaken or further spread; third, whether the noise related to macro policy and community governance evolves into clear institutional and technical directions. Until these variables provide clear answers, the current picture of "funds fleeing the mainstream and flowing to the margins" appears more like a brief risk aversion and structural testing in a high-volatility cycle, rather than evolving into a deep reconfiguration of asset allocation, which still requires more time and data for validation.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
