On January 23, 2026, the Bank of Japan maintained the short-term interest rate at 0.75% with a voting result of 8:1, choosing to remain cautious amid intertwined fiscal burdens and geopolitical risks. This decision sharply contrasts with the hawkish stance previously advocated by committee member Kōta Takeda, and does not align with the market's bets on a more aggressive tightening path. At the same time, in the U.S. stock and cryptocurrency markets, funds are being withdrawn from traditional assets and compliant products, coinciding with an increase in high-leverage on-chain trading, creating an intriguing dislocation. As expectations for Japanese easing cool significantly, the cryptocurrency market has not chosen to reduce risk but instead responded with extreme actions such as 25x leverage long on 4,212 ETH: in a world where interest rates and regulatory uncertainties are rising, why are some funds more willing to fully leverage?
The Split Signal of Eight Votes to Hold and One Vote to Raise
● Concerns of the Majority: In this decision passed with 8:1, the majority of committee members chose to keep the 0.75% rate unchanged, reflecting doubts about the resilience of Japan's economic recovery and concerns that higher rates could increase fiscal interest expenditures and impact vulnerable sectors. Faced with geopolitical risks and high domestic debt, they prefer to tolerate a certain level of inflation rather than actively create a secondary shock of credit contraction and asset repricing at this time.
● The Minority of Kōta Takeda: In contrast to the majority, committee member Kōta Takeda explicitly advocated for raising rates to 1.0%, highlighting the internal divergence within the decision-making body regarding the persistence of inflation and the risk of asset bubbles. He believes that the prolonged low-interest-rate environment is distorting asset prices and suppressing risk premiums; if pressure is not released early through rate hikes, higher costs may be incurred in the future to manage uncontrolled inflation and asset adjustments.
● Expectation Gaps and Price Reactions: Before the decision was announced, some investors bet that the Bank of Japan would release clearer hawkish signals, even wagering on a symbolic rate hike to respond to the global high-interest-rate environment. Therefore, while "holding steady" in outcome continues, it creates a gap in expectations, leading to a repricing of the Japan-U.S. interest rate differential and returns on yen assets, triggering short-term fluctuations in stocks, bonds, and risk assets, with cross-market arbitrage and hedging accelerating.
● Uncertainty in Ueda's Statements: The decision itself did not provide a clear future path, prompting the market to focus on the subsequent statements from Governor Kazuo Ueda. Some traders candidly stated, “The market is highly sensitive to Ueda's subsequent statements”, as any changes in wording regarding inflation assessments, wage trends, or fiscal risks could be interpreted as forward guidance on policy tendencies for the next meeting, further exacerbating the oscillation between expectations and asset prices.
Cross-Market Migration Under Fluctuating Japan-U.S. Interest Rate Differentials
● Interest Rate Differentials Pulling Risk Appetite: In a scenario where Japan is cautiously raising rates while the U.S. maintains relatively high rates, the Japan-U.S. interest rate differential becomes a key anchor for global capital allocation. Once the market feels that the Bank of Japan is still lagging behind the inflation curve, while the Federal Reserve is unlikely to shift significantly dovish in the short term, funds will be more inclined to use low-interest yen for financing, chasing overseas and high-beta assets, intensifying cross-market capital migration and the appeal of leveraged trading.
● Stock and Bond Direction and Migration Motives: Following the decision, the bond market's repricing of future rate hike rhythms and the stock market's adjustment of profit discount rates led some investors to reduce their positions in traditional assets, freeing up liquidity. The differing performances of stocks and bonds in Japan and the U.S. provide a realistic foundation for the trading logic of "selling traditional assets and turning to higher volatility targets," also planting motivational clues for some funds to flow into the cryptocurrency asset, a fringe market.
● ETF Net Outflows as a Barometer: On the cryptocurrency side, the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF saw a net outflow of approximately $32.07 million in a single day, reflecting from the perspective of institutional compliance channels that some long-term funds are choosing to reduce risk exposure in the current interest rate and volatility environment. While this figure does not constitute systemic panic, it serves as a high-frequency indicator for observing institutional risk appetite, sufficiently signaling that funds are reassessing the relative attractiveness of cryptocurrency assets.
● Single Source and Verification Needs: It is important to emphasize that the aforementioned ETF outflow data comes from a single source, serving only as one facet of emotional observation rather than a comprehensive view. To determine whether this is the beginning of a trend, it is necessary to cross-verify with subsequent multi-day net flows, data from other ETFs, and over-the-counter channels, avoiding the construction of grand narratives based on isolated data that misjudge the depth and sustainability of capital migration.
The Split Picture of ETF Blood Loss and On-Chain Leverage
● Institutional Outflows and Whale Speculation: On one side, there is a net outflow of $32.07 million from the spot Bitcoin ETF, while on the other, on-chain whale accounts are using 25x leverage to go long on 4,212 ETH. These two clues illustrate the completely different choice paths of compliant institutions and high-risk funds. The former reduces volatility exposure by cutting ETF holdings, while the latter floors the accelerator on derivatives and perpetual contracts, pushing directional bets on Ethereum to the extreme.
● Concentrated Speculative Sentiment: Some market voices assert, “25x leveraged ETH trading reflects market speculative sentiment.” In a phase where the macro outlook becomes increasingly unclear, such extreme leveraged positions are essentially bets on short-term volatility rather than votes of confidence in long-term fundamentals. They are more concerned with price fluctuations triggered by interest rate narratives, using severe market emotional swings to seek high-multiple short-term profit opportunities.
● Structural Risk Appetite Migration: From the perspective of capital flow paths, some funds that could have remained in spot ETFs or other compliant products may be shifting towards on-chain derivatives and high-leverage positions, chasing higher expected returns in a relatively loose regulatory environment with more flexible rules. This migration from "compliance to on-chain" does not necessarily mean that funds are fully bullish; rather, it resembles a structured risk redistribution, layering more levels of leverage on the same unit of capital.
● High-Beta Tools Favored Against the Wind: Even amid rising interest rates and macro uncertainties, and the ambiguous policy paths of Japan and the U.S., on-chain high leverage is still viewed by some traders as a key tool for seeking high-beta returns. Once there is an expectation that policy or regulatory narratives will create severe price volatility, both high-leverage long and short positions possess the ability to attract capital; what truly drives funds is not a one-sided bullish or bearish view, but rather greed for volatility itself.
MilkyWay Profit Distribution and Makina Asset Recovery's Underlying Order
● Steady-State Signals of Profit Distribution: While external macro narratives continue to disrupt, the on-chain application layer has not come to a standstill. The MilkyWay project completed a profit distribution of 92,708 USDC, distributing earnings to participants according to rules, sending a clear signal: even as interest rates and exchange rates fluctuate at the macro level, the cash flow machine at the protocol layer continues to operate, providing a relatively predictable safe haven for funds seeking stable cash flow.
● Asset Recovery and Security Infrastructure: On the other hand, the Makina execution engine recovered 920 ETH of stolen funds, filling an important gap in the security and risk control aspects of the on-chain ecosystem. For the cryptocurrency market, which has already experienced multiple rounds of hacker attacks and contract vulnerabilities, each successful asset recovery serves as an empirical testament to on-chain security infrastructure and collaborative mechanisms, directly influencing whether large funds dare to stay on-chain for the long term.
● Reinforcing the Narrative of "On-Chain Superior to Off-Chain": The events of profit distribution and asset recovery, from the perspectives of cash flow and security, add bricks to the narrative of "on-chain rules being transparent and verifiable." Compared to the old problems of information asymmetry and opaque clearing in the off-chain financial system, some long-term capital is attempting to find higher certainty in the auditable and automatically executed on-chain environment, thereby building their own "institutional sense of security" amid macro uncertainties.
● Data Sources and Representational Boundaries: It is also important to emphasize that the figures of 92,708 USDC distributed and 920 ETH recovered come from a single source, representing the performance of individual projects in specific scenarios rather than the general state of the entire cryptocurrency market. When viewing such events as "trend samples," it is essential to clearly label their sources and limitations, avoiding the masking of systemic risks by individual successes.
New Chips on the Regulatory Table and Global Comparisons
● Nasdaq's Regulatory Probe: In the U.S. capital markets, Nasdaq has proposed to lift the restrictions on cryptocurrency ETF options positions, seen as another signal of marginal relaxation in the regulatory environment. If this trend is approved by regulators, it means that compliant institutions will have greater operational space in using options to construct complex strategies, amplify or hedge risks, injecting new liquidity and leverage potential into the derivatives market.
● Strategic Space in Temporal Dislocation: Interestingly, this discussion of regulatory easing coincides with the $32.07 million net outflow from the spot Bitcoin ETF in terms of timing: as funds are withdrawn from the spot channel, the constraints on derivatives such as options may be loosening. This mismatch may prompt institutions to shift some risk exposure from "holding spot" to "utilizing options for structured exposure," leveraging lower capital usage to unlock similar or even higher yield curves.
● Amplifiers of Leverage and Volatility: Once derivatives regulation is further relaxed, the leverage and volatility in the cryptocurrency market may be exponentially amplified. Whether it is extreme actions like 25x leverage long on ETH or more complex cross-asset hedging structures, they will become easier to execute under more lenient derivatives rules. For the entire market, this means not only higher price discovery efficiency but also faster chain liquidation risks when liquidity crises arise.
● Contrast Between Japan's Caution and U.S. Openness: Compared to Nasdaq's proactive pursuit of greater derivatives space, the Bank of Japan has shown a distinctly cautious stance on interest rates and financial stability issues. One is tightening and fine-tuning within the existing monetary system to control bubbles and debt risks; the other is relaxing constraints at the regulatory level of capital markets to encourage innovation and risk diversification. On the same type of cryptocurrency assets, the answers provided by the two systems are completely different, with global funds caught in between, seeking the most favorable risk-return coordinates.
After Easing Expectations Cool: The Next Act of Japanese Rates and Crypto Leverage
The Bank of Japan maintained interest rates with an 8:1 vote but accommodated the minority opinion of Kōta Takeda to raise rates to 1.0%, creating a pattern of coexistence between hawkish and dovish views that amplifies the uncertainty of future interest rate paths and yen asset pricing. Each oscillation of expectations before and after meetings may trigger a new round of reassessment of yen financing trades and risk asset exposures, driving cross-market capital to rearrange its lines.
Looking at the big picture, from the $32.07 million net outflow from the spot Bitcoin ETF to the aggressive increase of 25x leveraged long positions on-chain, and to MilkyWay's distribution of 92,708 USDC and Makina's recovery of 920 ETH, these seemingly disparate fragments collectively outline the process of capital reallocation within and outside the cryptocurrency ecosystem: some institutions are exiting compliant spots to reshape risk curves in derivatives and on-chain protocols, while some long-term capital is quietly deepening its allocation weight on-chain through stable returns and security infrastructure.
If Japan gradually moves towards higher interest rates in the future, and the U.S. continues to relax derivatives regulation, then high-leverage trading around cryptocurrency assets may experience more intense rotations: rising yen financing costs, changes in U.S. Treasury yields, and relaxed options rules will jointly shape a market environment with more frequent volatility and deeper leverage. In this scenario, every severe fluctuation in the cryptocurrency market will no longer be just a "crypto event," but rather an asset repricing that resonates with global monetary and regulatory cycles.
For investors, the next key points to focus on are two clues: first, how the Bank of Japan and Kazuo Ueda's subsequent statements will guide expectations for interest rates and exchange rates; second, the cross-market capital flow data—including multi-day dimensions of ETF net flows, on-chain leverage positions, and protocol funding curves. At a stage where data is still insufficient, any grand conclusions based on single-day data or isolated events should be approached with caution. A truly robust strategy is built on continuous tracking, multi-dimensional verification, and a calm assessment of the risk-return structure.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
