On the night of January 19, 2026, Eastern Standard Time, from on-chain political betting to massive leveraged liquidations, and then to the rapid shift of options Gamma risk, multiple originally independent narratives were compressed into the same timeline. New accounts placed all bets on Trump acquiring Greenland, whales doubled down on Ethereum with 25x leverage after significant losses, and the options volatility around Bitcoin's key price levels collectively formed the core backdrop for this round of market turbulence. Meanwhile, the probability of Bitcoin hitting $100,000 was lowered to 25% on the prediction market Polymarket, with on-chain analysts pointing out that support in the $88,000-$90,000 range was clearly weakening, indicating a reduction in short-term upward momentum. According to Decrypt statistics, approximately $865 million in liquidations occurred during this round of volatility, revealing systemic fragility after a concentration of high leverage, and showcasing how emotions can rapidly reverse within hours during extreme market conditions.
$50,000 Bet on Greenland: A Magnifying Glass for Absurd Political Narratives
In this emotional market, a newly surfaced on-chain account stood out. Data from the on-chain monitoring platform Lookonchain showed that a new account named GamblingRuinsLives invested about $53,700 in a prediction contract betting on the extreme political scenario of "Trump acquiring Greenland." Compared to traditional macro events, these dramatic and symbolically charged political contracts have maintained a high level of interest in prediction markets related to Trump. In the current context of escalating US-EU trade conflicts and frequent discussions of tariffs, such a bet appears particularly striking. It is no longer just a marginal joke but more like a magnifying glass reflecting traders' preferences for extreme political risks, their obsession with black swan narratives, and their exaggerated imaginations of real political uncertainties. Behind this seemingly absurd target is the market's willingness to pay a premium for "low probability, high emotional value" scenarios in a high-volatility environment, and this preference itself has invisibly heightened the entire system's sensitivity to sudden political events.
Whale's $4.21 Million Loss Followed by All-In: From Individual Emotion to Systemic Leverage
In stark contrast to the absurdity of political betting is the aggressive operation of real funds on-chain under pressure. Onchain Lens detected that a large holder, after incurring a loss of about $4.21 million in previous trades, did not choose to reduce leverage or wait and see but instead turned around to go long on Ethereum with 25x leverage. This typical behavior of "loss chasing" essentially amplifies individual emotional imbalances and the impulse to recover losses into systemic risk at the market level through high-leverage tools. In an already high-leverage environment, such large and high-multiple additional bets can push up the density of liquidation prices, increasing the likelihood of triggering chain liquidations if prices reverse. Considering Decrypt's statistics of $865 million in liquidations across the network, this gamble is not an isolated all-in but rather a visible annotation of the entire leverage chain being stretched to its limits. It could either drive funds to create upward pressure on Ethereum prices in a short time, generating more intense volatility through short-term squeezes, or become the trigger for a new round of waterfall liquidations when the market reverses, turning localized risks into structural cascades due to high leverage.
Weakening Support at $88k: Options Gamma Amplifying Every Movement
If the on-chain betting and whale gambling showcase extreme forms of emotion, then the changes in the options and spot structure surrounding Bitcoin clearly depict the market's fragile technical profile. On-chain analyst Murphy pointed out that support for Bitcoin in the $88,000-$90,000 range is clearly weakening, with a tendency for price fluctuations to be further amplified in the short term. In this range, a large number of positions accumulated by both bulls and bears are gradually being digested, meaning that once prices break or repeatedly test this level, what was once seen as a "safety belt" could quickly turn into a downward slide. Meanwhile, on the prediction market Polymarket, the probability of Bitcoin reaching $100,000 in the near future has dropped to 25%, indicating a significant cooling of betting sentiment and reflecting a retreat in confidence regarding the narrative of "one-sided linear surges." More critically, changes in Gamma risk exposure in the options market have forced market makers to make larger-scale hedging adjustments in both spot and futures as prices approach key levels. When prices near these Gamma-dense areas, the passive buying or selling actions of market makers tend to amplify price fluctuations caused by interest rate changes, transforming adjustments that could have been absorbed by the market into more severe surges or sell-offs, making every movement that could have been merely a technical correction possess the potential to evolve into an "event-level" market.
From Trade Wars to Tariff Proposals: Resonance Structure Under Macro Shadows
Beyond technical and emotional factors, this round of adjustments in the crypto market cannot escape the shadow of the macro environment. Fisher8 Capital analyst Lai Yuen attributed the main driving factors behind this decline to the escalation of the US-EU trade war and the risk-averse sentiment raised by Trump's tariff proposals. As traditional markets begin to reprice the costs of tariffs and trade barriers, high-volatility, high-leverage crypto assets naturally become the first area where funds reduce risk exposure. There is a certain misalignment resonance between macro uncertainty and extreme political betting on-chain: on one side, there are increasing policy and geopolitical variables in the real world, and on the other, there is an exaggerated portrayal of extreme political scenarios in on-chain betting. The overlap of these two factors makes it easier for on-chain funds to choose to "withdraw first and talk later" when bad news arises, leading to a collective outflow in a very short time, forming a typical "political and leverage co-resonance" structure. In such an environment, high-leverage long positions and precarious support levels are simultaneously breached by macro headwinds, making downward fluctuations no longer just simple price corrections but amplified by continuously triggered forced liquidations, mutual踩踏 of liquidity exhaustion, and the migration of risk-averse sentiment. Ultimately, what the market sees is not a rational repricing process but a structural adjustment accompanied by concentrated liquidations and deep liquidity withdrawal.
Genius Airdrop Boost to 50: Invisible Cracks in the Arms Race for New Users
At a time of severe price volatility and tight macro sentiment, competition in the decentralized trading space is accelerating in another dimension. According to an official announcement from Genius, its platform has raised the token airdrop allocation to 50%, sending out a strong signal for attracting new users during the current heated DEX competition. On the surface, such enhanced airdrops often attract a large influx of short-term funds during high-volatility periods, significantly amplifying on-chain activity and trading volume through participation in airdrops, market making, and arbitrage. However, this liquidity attraction model centered on incentives also inherently possesses the characteristic of transforming into price fractures when risk events occur: when subsidy expectations weaken or participants begin to exit, the liquidity pool originally formed by airdrop-driven activity can quickly shrink, leaving prices lacking sufficient depth to absorb concentrated selling pressure. At the same time, when political contracts in on-chain betting and airdrop arbitrage opportunities coexist, incremental funds are more easily attracted to short-term speculation rather than being allocated to long-term strategies and relatively stable asset portfolios. This structural tilt of funds towards short-term and tool-based approaches makes the entire market resemble an engine that is accelerating continuously but lacks a sufficiently thick safety cushion. Once the direction changes unfavorably, the price and liquidity pullback could present a cliff-like shape.
Political Gambling and Leverage Frenzy: The Next Treadmill May Come Faster
From the new account's $53,700 bet on Greenland to the whale choosing to go all-in on Ethereum with 25x leverage after a $4.21 million loss, this round of market fluctuations first showcases an extreme preference driven by emotion: political risks are treated as tradable dramatic targets, losses are seen as reasons to further amplify bets, and macro uncertainty serves as the background noise for all high-volatility narratives. In this environment, political gambling and leverage frenzy are not isolated events but rather a resonant network woven together by on-chain fund flows and trading structures. Meanwhile, the weakening support for Bitcoin in the $88,000-$90,000 range, combined with changes in options Gamma risk, gives any new macro headwind the potential to be amplified by the market structure into a new wave of liquidation. The probability of the $100,000 target price on the prediction market dropping to 25% is not just a cold number reflecting cooling sentiment but a collective vote from the market on re-evaluating the one-sided upward story. At the DEX level, Genius raising the airdrop ratio to 50% represents a continuing arms race centered on incentives, while the fervor in prediction markets and the prevalence of airdrop arbitrage further elevate the weight of short-term speculation in the overall fund structure. If the risk management framework and leverage control mechanisms do not upgrade accordingly, the next treadmill may very well erupt within a shorter time window, faster, more widespread, and harder to quickly repair with a single positive development or technical signal.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
