Recently, the Hong Kong region has been working on a series of policy alignments between stablecoin regulation and banking regulation, aiming to make compliant stablecoins more easily accepted by local banks and integrated into the traditional financial services system. The legislative body has passed the Stablecoins Ordinance and determined the effective date of the relevant regulatory framework. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) subsequently released implementation guidelines and a consultation draft, clarifying regulatory requirements such as licensing, reserve asset management, redemption, and anti-money laundering.
To complement this new framework, regulatory authorities are discussing the capital measurement and risk weighting of banks concerning crypto assets, leaning towards a more targeted capital treatment for regulated stablecoins, provided that the safety of depositors and the financial system is ensured. This aims to alleviate the capital cost pressure faced by compliant banks when providing stablecoin-related services.
This policy direction is not isolated. Market participants and some international banks have expressed interest in issuing or participating in stablecoin businesses through regulatory channels. Recently, banks and enterprises have been organizing or preparing local fiat-pegged stablecoin projects in the Hong Kong region, indicating that traditional financial institutions are more willing to explore digital asset businesses once clear rules are established. The regulatory authorities have stated that they will adopt a limited licensing approach and phased regulation, encouraging innovation while maintaining caution, prioritizing fiat-referenced stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar or major foreign currencies, and requiring issuers to maintain high-quality, liquid, and low-risk reserve assets.
For banks, the refinement of capital rules has practical significance. Currently, most banks impose high risk weights on holding or engaging with crypto assets when calculating capital adequacy, which raises the threshold for providing custody, trading settlement, or client holding services. If regulators allow for a clear and lower risk weight for licensed stablecoins or their qualifying reserve assets in capital measurement, banks will be more motivated to engage when assessing compliance and commercial viability. However, this also requires regulators to establish strict compliance, auditing, and redemption assurance mechanisms to prevent systemic risks from spreading within the financial system.
Another aspect of the policy adjustment concerns macro and execution risks. Regulatory authorities have stated that while promoting facilitation, they will adhere to the principle of "same industry, same responsibility; same risk, same regulation" to prevent regulatory blind spots from arising through regulatory arbitrage. The willingness of banks to engage in stablecoin businesses ultimately depends on the transparency of the rules, the auditability requirements for reserve assets, the certainty of redemption and settlement processes, and the enforceability of anti-money laundering and customer due diligence (CDD) measures. If regulators only make concessions in capital measurement without simultaneously strengthening operational and compliance standards, it may lead to market misjudgments or excessive optimism regarding new licenses and products in the short term.
From an industry impact perspective, optimizing capital rules will help bring compliant stablecoins into mainstream payment and settlement scenarios, promoting the development of cross-border payments, trade settlements, and corporate digital asset management, while also opening new revenue sources for financial institutions. For the regulatory ecosystem, this initiative may also attract more international financial institutions to conduct stablecoin issuance and distribution in the Hong Kong region through legal frameworks, further solidifying Hong Kong's position as a regional digital asset hub. However, any policy relaxation must be accompanied by clear supervision, auditing, and crisis management plans to prevent issues such as liquidity risk, declining quality of reserve assets, or market manipulation from transmitting to the traditional financial system.
In summary, the current work route in the Hong Kong region reflects a strategy of steady alignment: after incorporating stablecoin activities into the regulatory view through legislation and forming a licensing and supervision framework, the next step is to adjust the accompanying banking regulatory tools, including but not limited to capital measurement methods, compliance checklists, and inter-agency collaboration mechanisms. Whether a balance can be struck between encouraging compliant innovation and maintaining financial stability will determine whether this policy can be transformed into executable and sustainable practices in the market, ultimately affecting Hong Kong's position in the global digital finance competition.
Related: From Scale to Quality: August Trading Platform Report Released, Revealing Industry Focus Shift and Strategic Adjustments
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
