Author: Weilin

Introduction

Since August 2025, a Stablecoin project closely associated with the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump, has sparked widespread attention. This project spans the internet, DeFi protocols, and traditional political realms, becoming a focal point of discussion across various circles. The recent token listing and unlocking have further elevated the project's popularity to new heights.

USD1

USD1 (Stablecoin) was launched by ALT5 Partners: backed by U.S. short-term Treasury bonds as the underlying asset, it offers zero-fee transactions, a phased unlocking mechanism, and cross-chain compatibility. The connection between ALT5 and the Trump family, along with USD1's stable performance around $47 (coinciding with the 47th president), suggests that a new "American RWA strategy" is taking shape.

WLFI

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) initially emerged as a boutique business branch of ALT5, later achieving a fusion operation of "tokenization + public company" through a SPAC-like model, completing the first "public listing transformation" in the Stablecoin sector.

This article will deeply analyze the core asset WLFI of this unprecedented RWA project from three dimensions: "political capital + U.S. Treasury-backed Stablecoin + boutique public company," and explore several key questions:

• Why does the first "presidential Stablecoin" in the U.S. start with USD1?
• Is WLFI truly a DAO, or a traditional public company disguised as a DAO?
• Is this a fusion breakthrough in financial innovation, or a laboratory product of the combination of politics and technology?

Chapter 1 | Project Background and Basic Information

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is undoubtedly the most controversial star project in the U.S. crypto market in 2025. It burst onto the scene as a "presidential Stablecoin," breaking the traditional boundaries between politics and cryptocurrency.

Dual Currency System

• USD1 Stablecoin — backed by short-term U.S. Treasury bonds, enabling zero-fee global payments.
• WLFI Governance Token — ostensibly a governance tool, but in essence, a tokenized expression of political stance. Holders not only enjoy profit-sharing and voting rights but, more importantly, gain an "identity marker" for Trump's political ideology in the crypto world.

Power Structure

The governance structure of the project is a textbook example of political-business power. The World Liberty Foundation is responsible for daily operations, but the real control lies with the Nasdaq-listed company ALT5 Sigma Corp. This nested structure is not a coincidence but a carefully arranged design: it meets regulatory compliance requirements, ensures direct monetization of political capital, and provides a legitimate entry point for Wall Street funds.

Power Center

• Political Core Layer: Donald Trump Jr. serves as a strategic advisor, leading the narrative construction of "American Financial Sovereignty"; Eric Trump holds real power on the ALT5 board, controlling key decision-making nodes.
• Executive Layer: Matt Morgan transitions from Trump’s campaign legal advisor to investment director, transplanting political operational experience into the capital market; Zach Witkoff, leveraging his background from a New York real estate family, serves as the chairman of ALT5.

Innovative Dual-Track Financing Model

• Equity Channel: ALT5 issues 200 million shares (100 million common shares + 100 million PIPE placements) at $7.5 per share, raising $1.5 billion, directly connecting with Wall Street funds.
• Token Channel: The WLFI token is set to launch on exchanges on September 1, with the first 20% of circulation released to global crypto investors.

Chapter 2 | Political Capital and Regulatory Games

The most striking aspect of World Liberty Financial is not its technological innovation but its pioneering of the direct monetization of political capital through cryptocurrency. As the Trump family re-emerges as a focal point in American politics, WLFI's choice to launch in the highly regulated Stablecoin sector is itself a high-risk political financial experiment.

Digital Transformation of Trump-Linked Capital

Eric Trump sits on the ALT5 Sigma board, holding actual control over the project; Donald Trump Jr. frequently advocates for USD1 in public, directly converting the family's political reputation into project endorsement; the "47 USD1" airdrop event is a classic case of political marketing — the number 47 directly points to the 47th president's identity, perfectly merging political symbols with financial products.

Dramatic Shift in Regulatory Environment

After Trump's return to power, U.S. crypto regulation experienced a 180-degree turn. The most notable event was the signing of the GENIUS Act on July 18, which requires Stablecoins to be 100% backed by U.S. dollars or short-term Treasury bonds and mandates issuers to publicly disclose reserve compositions monthly.

This timing is intriguing: WLFI announced in March that USD1 would be backed by short-term U.S. Treasury bonds and cash equivalents, almost perfectly aligning with the later legislative requirements. This "predictive compliance" is hard to dismiss as coincidence.

Even more dramatically, Congress is fiercely debating the Trump family's $2 billion crypto transactions, with Democratic lawmakers expressing concerns over significant corruption risks. However, the Republican-controlled legislature seems unwilling to pause related policy advancements.

Divergence in the Political Spectrum of Stablecoins

• Traditional Compliance Faction (represented by Circle): Emphasizes good relations with the Democratic establishment, strictly adheres to New York state and federal regulatory requirements, regularly publishes audit reports, and primarily serves institutional clients.
• Political Shelter Faction (represented by WLFI): Relies on Republican political resources, tends to operate in regulatory gray areas, with relatively vague audit information disclosure, primarily targeting retail investors and Trump supporters.

Chapter 3 | Digital Reconstruction of Dollarization Strategy

The USD1 Stablecoin is far more than a payment tool within the WLFI ecosystem; it represents a strategic extension of dollar hegemony in the digital age. Against the backdrop of a growing global "de-dollarization" trend, USD1 carries the mission of opening new battlefields for the dollar.

Political Considerations in Technical Architecture

According to official announcements, USD1 employs a carefully designed technical architecture:

• De-Banking Pathway: By using non-bank institutions like BitGo for custody, USD1 avoids traditional banks' KYC and anti-money laundering requirements, clearing institutional barriers for rapid global expansion.
• Pure Treasury Bond Support: Compared to USDC's "cash + bonds" mixed model, USD1's pure Treasury bond structure resembles a "digital U.S. Treasury bond ETF," with each USD1 directly representing the credit of the U.S. government.
• Multi-Chain Parallelism: In addition to Ethereum, USD1 is also issued on networks like TRON, providing a technical foundation for its promotion in Asia and emerging markets.

Strategic Involvement of UAE Capital

MGX's $2 billion investment in Binance reveals another dimension of USD1's strategic value. According to Bloomberg and Eric Trump, the Abu Dhabi state-backed investment firm MGX used USD1 as a payment tool in its $2 billion investment in Binance.

As a national investment institution of the UAE, MGX's choice of USD1 over USDC or USDT is, in fact, a sovereign-level recognition of Trump's political Stablecoin. Gulf countries are beginning to view politicized Stablecoins as hedging tools against the risks of U.S. financial sanctions.

The entire transaction was conducted using Stablecoins, bypassing the traditional SWIFT system, demonstrating the feasibility of digital dollars in large cross-border investments.

Chapter 4 | Political Calculations Behind Technical Choices

WLFI's conservatism in technical architecture is not coincidental. In a project where political influence is the core competitive advantage, technological innovation could become a burden. Every technical solution chosen by USD1 reveals the project's extreme emphasis on political stability.

Smart Calculation of Dual-Chain Layout

USD1 is deployed simultaneously on Ethereum and TRON, a choice that seems ordinary but hides deeper significance.

Ethereum serves as the "facade." U.S. institutional investors and regulators are familiar with the Ethereum ecosystem, and operating USD1 here helps establish a compliant image. More importantly, DeFi participants on Wall Street are primarily concentrated in Ethereum, facilitating institutional adoption of USD1.

TRON's role is entirely different. Sun Yuchen's $30 million investment is not just financial support but paves the way for USD1's promotion in the Asian market. TRON's advantages in cross-border payments and high-frequency trading scenarios perfectly compensate for Ethereum's high gas fees.

Pragmatic Choice of Plug-and-Play Integration

USD1 does not reinvent DeFi protocols but directly integrates with existing leading projects: Aave provides lending scenarios, Curve and Balancer offer liquidity, and LayerZero handles cross-chain bridging.

The benefits of this "parasitic" strategy are evident: rapid launch, low technical risk, and immediate support from a mature ecosystem. USD1 does not need to spend years cultivating a developer community or bear the full responsibility for protocol security.

However, the costs are also clear: a lack of technical moat, ease of replication, and strong dependence on external protocols. Any issues with an integrated protocol could impact the normal operation of USD1.

Chapter 5 | Competitive Positioning Analysis of USD1

The timing of USD1's entry into the Stablecoin market is quite delicate. As USDT faces scrutiny over transparency issues, USDC experiences division due to political stances, and DAI's complex mechanisms deter ordinary users, USD1 has chosen a completely different path: positioning political identity as its core competitive advantage.

Political Packaging of Reserve Strategy

USD1 claims to be 100% backed by short-term U.S. Treasury bonds; this design appears to be a technical choice but is, in fact, a political declaration.

The pure Treasury bond design of USD1 sends a strong signal: each token directly represents the credit of the U.S. government. This is not just a reserve choice but an expression of political alignment. When users hold USD1, they are effectively providing funding support for U.S. government debt.

Killing Power of Zero-Fee Strategy

The fee structure of traditional Stablecoins leaves room for arbitrage: USDT and USDC typically charge institutional users a redemption fee of 0.1%-0.3%, while DAI's operations involve complex stability fee mechanisms. USD1's zero-fee commitment has a clear advantage in cost-sensitive scenarios like international remittances and large transactions.

Clear Positioning in the Political Spectrum

The greatest innovation of USD1 lies in making political stance the core of its brand, an unprecedented move in the history of Stablecoins.

While USDC maintains close ties with the Democratic Party, and Circle executives have participated in Biden administration policy-making, the project itself presents a facade of technical neutrality; USDT deliberately maintains political neutrality, adjusting its partner banks multiple times under regulatory pressure; DAI attempts to shed political color through decentralized governance.

USD1, however, goes against the grain, clearly branding itself as the "Trump-linked Stablecoin." This strategy carries both risks and opportunities: supporters of Trump may view it as a tool for political expression, while opponents may completely refuse to use it.

Chapter 6 | Capital Games of Political Bubble

The financing story of WLFI is a textbook case of the monetization of political capital. In less than a year, the project attracted over $550 million in investments, leveraging the political halo of the Trump family, but this figure conceals a complex game of valuation and risk transfer.

Complex Structure of Capital Operations

• Stunning Results in the Pre-Sale Phase: The pre-sale activity that began in October 2024 ultimately raised over $550 million, attracting participation from more than 85,000 wallet addresses. Early investors acquired tokens at prices of $0.015 and $0.05, while the opening price on September 1 reached $0.30, meaning early investors achieved returns of up to 20 times.
• Key Operations in ALT5's Acquisition: Earlier this year, World Liberty Financial acquired a small payment company named Alt5 Sigma (which previously mainly sold painkillers). After the acquisition, Alt5 raised $750 million from external investors and then used these funds to purchase WLFI tokens. This arrangement effectively allowed the Trump family to sell their tokens to a company they control, with 75% of the profits flowing back to Trump-affiliated entities.
• Strategic Investment Upgrade by Sun Yuchen: According to the latest information, Sun Yuchen's investment actually exceeded $75 million, gaining not only tokens but also serving as a project advisor. More importantly, shortly after Trump's re-election, the SEC's investigation into Sun Yuchen's company was dropped.

Sophisticated Design of Lock-Up Mechanism

• Total Supply Distribution: Of the 100 billion WLFI tokens, approximately 19.96 billion are allocated to the treasury, 33.51 billion to the team, 16 billion are locked for public sale, and 5.8 billion to strategic partners. The Trump family holds 22.5 billion tokens through DT Marks DEFI LLC, valued at over $7 billion at current prices.
• Phased Unlocking Strategy: The first unlocking on September 1 released only 20% (about 5 billion tokens), while the unlocking schedule for the remaining 80% is determined by community governance votes, rather than being automatically released. This design appears decentralized but actually allows the project team to flexibly control token supply based on market conditions.
• Technical Threshold of the Lockbox Mechanism: All investors must activate their wallets through an audited Lockbox smart contract to participate in the unlocking. When the Lockbox opened on August 25, many Coinbase wallet users encountered connection issues, exposing the complexity and potential risks of technical implementation.

Market Makers and Liquidity Arrangements

• Comprehensive Exchange Coverage: On the opening day of September 1, WLFI was simultaneously listed on major exchanges such as Binance, Bybit, MEXC, Bitget, Gate, KuCoin, and Hyperliquid, demonstrating the project team's strong resource mobilization capabilities.
• Immediate Manifestation of Pre-Sale Selling Pressure: Lookonchain data showed that immediately after the opening, three pre-sale wallets transferred 160 million WLFI (worth about $51.2 million) to Binance, revealing the cash-out pressure on early investors.
• Frenzy in the Derivatives Market: Before spot trading began, WLFI's derivatives trading volume reached $2.22 billion, with open interest nearing $1 billion. Binance accounted for about 50% of the derivatives trading volume, indicating strong speculative interest in the token.
• Severe Price Volatility: The opening price was $0.30, peaking at $0.33 before falling back to $0.21, fully reflecting the high volatility characteristics of politically conceptual coins.

Chapter 7 | Power Games Behind the DAO Mask

WLFI claims to adopt decentralized governance, but a deeper analysis of its governance structure reveals that it resembles a carefully orchestrated political performance. The so-called "DAO" governance mechanism is, in fact, a legal facade for the Trump family to maintain control over the project.

The Truth Behind Concentrated Voting Power

On-chain data reveals the true nature of WLFI governance:

In the voting for the USD1 airdrop resolution, the top five wallet addresses controlled over 40% of the voting power; in the voting for ecological funding proposals, seven core wallets held over 55% of the decision-making power. This concentration far exceeds any standard that could be considered "decentralized."

Even more suspiciously, there is clear coordinated behavior among these large-holding wallet addresses. They often vote within the same time frame, with highly consistent voting choices, exposing the possibility of a unified decision-making mechanism behind them.

The political intent of this structural design is evident: to mask the reality of oligarchic rule with the democratic appearance of a DAO. Ordinary investors believe they are participating in governance decisions, but in reality, they are merely providing legitimacy for predetermined outcomes.

Institutionalized Details of Team Control

Based on the latest public information, WLFI's actual control structure is more centralized than publicly advertised:

Specific Arrangements for Family Holdings: The Trump family holds 22.5 billion WLFI tokens (22.5% of total supply) through DT Marks DEFI LLC, valued at over $7 billion at current market prices. Donald Trump has been officially appointed as "Chief Crypto Advocate," Barron Trump serves as "DeFi Visionary," and Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are both "Web3 Ambassadors."

Actual Distribution of Operational Power: Although it claims to have decentralized governance, daily operations are entirely controlled by three partners: Zachary Folkman, Chase Herro, and Zach Witkoff. Among them, Zach Witkoff is the son of Steve Witkoff (Trump's envoy), ensuring consistency in the political line.

Opaque Mechanism of Profit Distribution: Trump's business entities own 60% of World Liberty's equity but have the right to receive 75% of token sales profits. This asymmetrical arrangement places most of the risk on ordinary investors while allowing the Trump family to reap the majority of the rewards.

Structural Flaws in the Voting Mechanism

WLFI's governance design has multiple fatal flaws:

The one-token-one-vote mechanism is theoretically fair, but in practice, it reinforces the influence of wealth concentration. Large holders can quickly accumulate voting power through OTC trading, airdrops, etc., while ordinary users' voices are completely marginalized.

The threshold for initiating proposals is set too high, making it difficult for ordinary community members to push for genuine topic discussions. Even if proposals enter the voting process, the opacity of the review mechanism leaves room for manipulation.

The absence of anti-collusion mechanisms means that related wallets can coordinate actions, effectively concentrating dispersed voting power. This design almost invites manipulative behavior.

Systematic Lack of Transparency

Compared to mature DeFi DAOs, WLFI has a significant gap in governance transparency:

Voting results are often delayed in publication, leaving a time window for behind-the-scenes operations; there is a lack of public governance forums, preventing effective consensus from forming in community discussions; some important proposals are even not publicly disclosed on-chain, directly bypassing the basic requirements of decentralized governance.

This lack of transparency is not a technical issue but a design choice. The project team clearly does not want the governance process to be subjected to excessive external scrutiny, which contradicts the fundamental spirit of a DAO.

Comparison with Real DAOs

Comparing WLFI with mature DAO projects like MakerDAO and Uniswap, the differences are glaring:

While MakerDAO also has issues with large holder concentration, it has established representative systems and public debate mechanisms to ensure that different voices are heard; Uniswap DAO has set detailed proposal processes and community discussion phases, requiring significant decisions to undergo thorough public debate.

WLFI lacks these checks and balances, resembling a board governance disguised as a DAO. The role of token holders is closer to that of shareholders rather than genuine governance participants.

Chapter 8 | The Judgment Stage in Washington

WLFI is no longer just a crypto project; it is becoming a litmus test for self-examination within the American political system. When a presidential family directly participates in the issuance of Stablecoins, the traditional boundaries between politics and business are completely shattered, and the power machinery in Washington begins to intervene comprehensively.

Political Hunting on Capitol Hill

Since August 2025, the political offensive against WLFI has intensified. Democratic lawmakers have keenly sensed the political value of this project — it serves as an excellent weapon to attack the Trump family and a perfect case to question the legitimacy of cryptocurrencies.

Senate Banking Committee member Elizabeth Warren and House Financial Services Committee member Maxine Waters have joined forces to pressure the SEC, FinCEN, and CFTC to conduct a comprehensive investigation into WLFI. The questions they raised strike at the core: Did the Trump family use token sales to fund political activities? Did ALT5's listing process evade disclosure requirements? Does USD1 comply with Stablecoin regulatory standards?

The political implications of these questions far exceed the technical level. The Democrats are trying to portray WLFI as a symbol of political corruption, while the Republicans view it as a representative of financial innovation. The struggle between the two sides has transcended the project itself, becoming part of a larger political battle.

Subtle Positions of Regulatory Agencies

Under the new leadership appointed by Trump, the SEC has noticeably relaxed its enforcement against crypto projects, but the political sensitivity of WLFI forces it to proceed cautiously; the CFTC has yet to make a clear statement, possibly waiting for political winds to become clearer; FinCEN faces pressure from Congress but must also consider policy coordination with the White House.

Historical Lessons as Warnings

The Kennedy family's investment fund scandal in the 1960s severely damaged the family's reputation; the peanut farm controversy during President Carter's term became a focal point for Republican attacks; the Clinton family's Whitewater real estate case affected two presidential terms; and the recent Hunter Biden business dealings have become a core issue in political struggles.

Weaponization of Electoral Politics

The Democrats package it as a symbol of "privileged corruption," using it to prove that the Trump family exploits political status for personal gain; the Republicans describe it as an "innovative breakthrough," showcasing Trump's forward-looking support for emerging industries; independent voters may see it as a microcosm of issues within the political system, influencing their voting choices.

Multiple Layers of Legal Risks

Securities Law Level: If the SEC determines that WLFI tokens constitute unregistered securities, the project may face operational shutdown and hefty fines; Stablecoin Regulatory Level: If USD1 is deemed non-compliant, it may be required to delist or restructure; Corporate Law Level: If ALT5's financial reports have issues, it may face severe penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; Campaign Finance Law Level: If token sales are recognized as disguised political donations, it may trigger criminal investigations.

Chapter 9 | The Ecological Ambition of Politicalized DeFi

WLFI is attempting an unprecedented experiment: directly embedding political influence into the DeFi ecosystem. This is not a simple technical integration but a fundamental reshaping of the decentralized finance concept — replacing economic incentives with political identity and substituting algorithmic governance with authoritative endorsement.

Political Pathways for Liquidity Acquisition

WLFI's injection of $50 million into Aave appears to be a routine DeFi integration on the surface, but it actually reveals the project's deeper strategy. This funding is not just for yield generation or providing liquidity; it is also a way to demonstrate the "authenticity" of USD1 to the market. By collaborating with leading DeFi protocols, WLFI aims to lend technical legitimacy to its political stablecoin. However, this strategy contains a fundamental contradiction: the core value of DeFi lies in decentralization and permissionlessness, while WLFI's value derives precisely from centralized political authority. This contradiction may become increasingly apparent as the project develops.

Multi-Chain Expansion Strategy of USD1

Recent information indicates that the multi-chain deployment of USD1 is more aggressive than expected:

• Rapid Supply Growth: Since its launch in April 2025, the supply of USD1 has reached $2.4 billion, making it one of the top five stablecoins by market capitalization. This growth rate is extremely rare in the history of stablecoins.
• Strategic Significance of Solana Integration: At the end of August, WLFI confirmed the minting of $100 million USD1 on the Solana network, marking the project's expansion to a fourth public chain. Solana's high-speed, low-fee characteristics provide a technical foundation for the application of USD1 in DeFi protocols.
• Marketing Innovation through PancakeSwap Collaboration: The "USD1 Million Momentum Campaign" launched in June incentivized meme tokens and DeFi projects on the BNB Chain to use USD1 as a trading pair through deep collaboration with PancakeSwap. This marketing strategy successfully increased USD1's penetration in the DeFi ecosystem.
• Comprehensive Upgrade of Market Making Strategy: According to the latest governance proposal, WLFI plans to use liquidity fees from Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana for token buybacks and burns, a mechanism that will permanently reduce the token supply in an attempt to artificially create scarcity and drive up prices.

Subtle Relationship with Mainstream Protocols

The collaboration with Aave has been relatively smooth, possibly due to Aave's relatively neutral technical positioning; potential cooperation with Curve is more complex, as it could create direct competition between USD1 and USDC.

Chapter 10 | Digital Experiment in Global Political Finance

As WLFI extends its reach to international markets, it is no longer a simple domestic political project in the United States but an important piece in the global geopolitical chess game. Amid rising calls for "de-dollarization," USD1 attempts to repackage dollar hegemony with political endorsement, and the success or failure of this experiment will impact the geopolitical landscape of future digital currencies.

New Attempts at Digital Dollar Diplomacy

The internationalization strategy of USD1 is essentially a digital upgrade of dollar diplomacy.

Traditional dollar diplomacy relies on military protection, trade agreements, and financial infrastructure. USD1 seeks to bypass these traditional channels through blockchain technology, directly reaching global users. The design backed 100% by U.S. Treasury bonds sends a strong signal: using USD1 is a direct endorsement of U.S. national credit.

This strategy may be extremely effective in specific regions. The conservative political traditions of the Middle East align with WLFI's political stance; Southeast Asia's financial neutrality provides a testing ground for USD1; and Africa's weak financial infrastructure leaves significant space for dollar stablecoins.

However, the risks are equally apparent. In regions with heightened "de-dollarization" sentiments, USD1 may be viewed as a new tool for U.S. financial surveillance, provoking stronger resistance.

International Challenges of Regulatory Coordination

WLFI's international expansion faces complex cross-border regulatory challenges:

The EU's MiCA legislation takes a strict stance on politicized digital assets; Singapore's PSA regulations require stablecoin issuers to maintain political neutrality; regulatory agencies in Japan and South Korea may exercise caution regarding the Trump political brand.

These regulatory differences mean that USD1 may only be able to operate in specific jurisdictions, limiting its global ambitions.

Harsh Realities of Market Performance

• Fate of Peak at Opening: The opening price on September 1 was $0.30, giving the project a fully diluted valuation of $34 billion, instantly pushing it into the top 30 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. However, this highlight moment lasted only a few hours, after which the price quickly fell back to $0.21, with a 24-hour decline of over 30%.
• Concentrated Selling Pressure from Pre-Sale Cash-Outs: On the opening day, tokens worth over $50 million were transferred to exchanges, confirming early investors' eagerness to cash out their 20-fold returns. This concentrated selling pressure exposed fundamental flaws in the project's liquidity management.
• False Prosperity of Derivatives Frenzy: A single-day derivatives trading volume of $2.2 billion and nearly $1 billion in open interest superficially indicate significant market interest, but in reality, they reflect excessive speculation and distortions in the price discovery mechanism.
• Hasty Emergency Market Rescue Measures: In response to the price drop, the project team proposed a token buyback and burn plan within 48 hours, attempting to support the price by artificially reducing supply, but the effectiveness and sustainability of such measures are questionable.

In Conclusion

WLFI may ultimately be recorded in history as one of three roles: a pioneering success story, a cautionary failure, or a transitional experimental product. Regardless of the outcome, it has already left an indelible mark at the intersection of politics, technology, and finance.

This project has demonstrated to the world that in the digital age, the boundaries between political influence, technological innovation, and financial instruments are becoming increasingly blurred. How to navigate this ambiguity will determine the future direction of the digital economy.

What WLFI is undertaking is not just a commercial experiment but also a social experiment about the relationship between power, technology, and finance. Its success or failure will provide valuable lessons for humanity in exploring governance models in the digital age.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。