It's quite interesting. Just a couple of days ago, I saw that the OKX Web3 wallet formed liquidity on Alpha, and today there's also a unilateral liquidity provider called @uptopmeme on BNBChain. Liquidity is indeed a battleground right now.

Recently, I've been continuously checking Alpha and realized that not all liquidity on Alpha is good. After so many days of checking, everyone seems to be focusing on $ZKJ mainly because it has good depth and low slippage. However, the biggest issue with bilateral liquidity is that if the popularity of this token declines, it’s very likely that you will end up holding a bag of coins.

Even providing liquidity within a certain range can lead to losses due to a drop in coin prices, especially since altcoins can easily drop but find it hard to rise. Therefore, adding unilateral liquidity can indeed reduce the risks associated with altcoins, but there are still issues to consider.

How to operate unilateral liquidity, and what to do when the liquidity of altcoins does not match that of $BNB, what is the matching mechanism, and how to ensure profits—these are all problems that unilateral liquidity needs to address. There were also unilateral liquidity pools during the peak of DeFi in 2021, but back then, they were all settled in USDT, which made it somewhat better.

Currently, having a BNB settlement option is definitely a good thing. If there can be a more detailed mechanism combined with Alpha's high traffic, it might really be an opportunity to earn BNB.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。